OK, I kinda get it. You consider edits that you evaluate to be superfluous to be annoying or harmful. This is besides the main issue of accessibility or whatever here. So you object if some edit was only editing "soem" to "some" in a long enough post. The opposition to your argument also consists of two points: 1) If an edit in a long answer corrects a simple typo, why is it "annoying" or worse, should be rolled back? If an edit's only improving the post very slightly, why is it bad? and 2) Accessibility.