There appears to be a discrepancy between the badges displayed next to my username and the badges displayed in my profile.
On M.SO I see 2(S) 13(B) (total:15), but on my profile page there are only 13 badges listed.
Similarly, on SO I see 14(S) 31(B) (total:45), but on my profile page it lists ...
There appears to be a discrepancy between the badges displayed next to my username and the badges displayed on my profile page.
At the top of the page on M.SO I see 2(S) 13(B) (total:15), but on my profile page there are only 13 badges listed.
Similarly, on SO I see 14(S) 31(B) (total:45), but ...
@rchern I tried to vindicate you by spinning the wheel to see whose fault it was that the WOB pointed the finger at you....but it landed on you again, so my hands are tied.
This is true. While my commentary is unnecessarily abundant, my ability to go into people's homes and break their kitchen appliances has not matured to a level where it'd be effective.
@drachenstern It did kind of, I meant to mention it when you did it...when you hover, the action icons on the right hand side had the wrong background colour. ;)
@GeorgeStocker The effectiveness of any interaction with Comcast is usually dependent on the time of day at which you call, mixed in with a few parts blind luck.
@GeorgeStocker I was hoping that they'd finally run out of different pictures of his face to show in that banner....which they did, swapping over to random Wikipedia authors instead.
Please consider implementing the request for some sort of a spoiler markdown using the following syntax:
why did we trust <spoiler>rchern</spoiler> ? WHY OH GOD WHY?
<spoiler>
The cake is a lie.
</spoiler>
I propose <spoiler> over the modified blockquote syntax &...
This has been implemented in spirit, but as the >! syntax instead. We really don't want to be in the business of making up new HTML tags; it's already confusing enough mixing HTML with Markdown arbitrarily.
The syntax is
>! Spoiler text!
Examples
Spoiler text!
This is not yet re...
I like how as it got posted in here, it got answered over there
so for dinner tonight, I have prepared a lovely creamed potato with garlic, a bit of cubed carrots, some bite sized green beans and some excellently seasoned roast beef with a nice rich brown gravy ... who's joining me?
I qualified for it, I just never filled out the paperwork apparently (mainly because when I learned that I had to it was supposedly too late to do so, which ended up being untrue)...so no dice on that one.
It seems like most of the messaging systems I've looked at have basic, if any, support for priority message queues. For example, the AMQP only specifies a minimum of 2 priorities. RabbitMQ, an AMQP implementation, doesn't support any priorities. ActiveMQ will be getting support for 10 message pri...
There appears to be a discrepancy between the badges displayed next to my username and the badges displayed in my profile.
On M.SO I see 2(S) 13(B) (total:15), but on my profile page there are only 13 badges listed.
Similarly, on SO I see 14(S) 31(B) (total:45), but on my profile page it lists ...
I am seeing a similar issue:
Please consider implementing the request for some sort of a spoiler markdown using the following syntax:
why did we trust <spoiler>rchern</spoiler> ? WHY OH GOD WHY?
<spoiler>
The cake is a lie.
</spoiler>
I propose <spoiler> over the modified blockquote syntax &...
This has been implemented in spirit, but as the >! syntax instead. We really don't want to be in the business of making up new HTML tags; it's already confusing enough mixing HTML with Markdown arbitrarily.
The syntax is
>! Spoiler text!
Examples
Spoiler text!
This is not yet re...
