@ShadowWizardStrikesBack afaik, it will increase suddenly on one day. Not only about posts 'bad' enough, but about everything they have done on the internet. The amount of data collected about their brains to create generative AI.... and so on/
we could instead archive all potentially AI generated answers, and perform analysis on them. But don't ask me how we can perform analysis on them (i literally don't know). @Shadow, can we?
@Exampleperson probably someone can, but unlike comments, deleted posts can be viewed by ordinary users with enough rep, and easily searchable for mods. So not much point in archive.
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack but without the spam I would've suspended for AI generated content because it meets certain strict criteria :)
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack In this case, yeah. Spammers get their profiles destroyed, AI posters don't, the latter only get their post deleted and a short suspension ;) so I prefer to treat spam as spam regardless of how it's generated :P
@BigJoe I'll leave it. Only staff can tell if it's completed (they actually fixed something) or no-repro.