« first day (4692 days earlier)      last day (322 days later) » 

@Feeds Chatting with balpha at Town Hall: onebox in Blog and the new oneboxOS
 
5:28 AM
Was there a blacklash of third party apps with SE and if so how did they deal with the backlash of not using them anymore?
I'm a founder of a sub on reddit and we are going dark on the 12-14th for support and a strike
 
5:45 AM
@BigJoe no? Third-party apps are still free to use the API, if that's what you meant.
 
6:24 AM
@BigJoe not sure what you mean. SE never used third party apps for itself, they did have their own app for a short while, until they realized there's no profit in it and shut it down.
No big backlash, it was fair decision.
 
6:40 AM
@MetaAndrewT. Got it thanks
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack Didn't know that. learning new stuff everyday. Thanks
 
@BigJoe didn't know SE had its own app... fair, lol. Well, the iOS version was really good, the android version... less so, to say the least. Its only developer had serious IRL issues so couldn't work on it, hence it was full of bugs and overall lacking many features the iOS version did have.
 
6:57 AM
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack it was also a sloooooow death
 
@JourneymanGeek yeah, but totally expected.
 
huh. TIL we have Why isn't providing feedback mandatory on downvotes, and why are ideas suggesting such negatively received? on MSE as well as MSO. I had only ever seen the MSO copy before.
 
@starball opposite for me lol
And couldn't find it on MSO with quick search, so probably only few can. :D
 
@starball Yeah, it's copied for duplicate target
 
(probably using different words)
 
7:03 AM
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack it's quite similar actually. meta.stackoverflow.com/q/357436/11107541
 
@starball missing "mandatory" which is what caused my search to fail.
That's quite the key word. Or should be.
 
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack ah
 
Also locking FAQ answer is terrible.
The whole point is letting the users edit.
Well, that's MSO, no surprise.
If you don't want edits in FAQ, make it help center page, simple as that.
Well, not really related to anything, but I just ordered a car rental for the August vacation. 7 days in Italy, rented a Jeep. ;)
 
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack noice
but why though?
 
7:19 AM
@starball oh, not alone. With wife and kids, during the summer holiday from school. One week vacation in Italy, wife ordered flight and hotel, leaving car rental for me. We'll be in Milan, and travel in the area. :)
We were in Germany before covid, and London last year.
Jul 2, 2022 at 0:03, by Shadow Wizard Says No More War
I plan going to London in August with the whole family, but with COVID rising again, and overall insanity in airports, can't be certain.
;)
 
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack system dosen't know the difference
 
@JourneymanGeek difference between what?
Mod manually locked the answer.
 
Ahh
Spam?
 
@JourneymanGeek no, probably due to too many comment and edit wars.
 
Ahh no too many OT rant answers
 
7:26 AM
Sensitive subject, sure, but still. Can't handle it, so ask SE to add to some help center page and link there where needed.
 
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack ohhhhh. sorry sorry. I hate leaving the house so sometimes when I hear people say "vacation", I project myself onto them and imagine that they are actually meaning "staycation".
 
@starball rofl
I'm also into my routine, and not fully enjoying family vacations, doing it more for the kids than for myself. ;)
 
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack hope you all have a good time together :)
 
Thanks!
Kids will most likely enjoy, we parents... probably less... :D
 
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack being a parent sounds tough
 
7:31 AM
@starball it is! But it's like a long term investment. ;)
Now to see how I can have international driving license...
Found it! Luckily there's a place nearby my home so should be simple.
 
 
2 hours later…
9:49 AM
So, how goes the strike? If I were in a city where SE Inc. has offices, I would think of organizing a protest vigil, and maybe even pasting some pamphlets to their front doors.
 
The strike is... striking. :) We're selecting people to negotiate with SE, although I don't expect much "negotiation" to happen, since our representatives are hopefully going to stick to the demands that we've outlined several times.
 
There are so many lost souls here on the meta
"How to find a person named Franco.893"
Is this some kind of spam?
 
10:06 AM
@Mithical so, despite the slow down in Meta activity something is going on behind the curtain?
 
correct, we're in the bureaucracy stage now
 
10:40 AM
@Mithical that said that's where we generally are these days
 
@Mithical @JourneymanGeek I like the fact that something is still moving but it still feels bad that from your average Joe passerby point of view it looks like the "issue" is gone.
and coincidentally, the last post that the same average Joe could see as "the company solving the problem" is the one with the "data" that somehow managed to produce enough smoke to even get a positive overall score despite all the serious issues it has (see starball answer for example, the presented data seems not correlated at all)
 
@SPArcheon well on this issue anyway
And considering we're virtual and volunteers it's not like we can picket SE hq.
 
@JourneymanGeek yep, my worries is that I don't know if the moderators can do this alone. And engagement/awareness seems to be dropping. I wouldn't want the company to be able to just wait and sit this out.
 
11:01 AM
It's also Friday, activity always plummets on the weekends.
 
 
2 hours later…
@Feeds no...
 
1:37 PM
@Feeds AIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAI
 
 
2 hours later…
3:07 PM
@Spevacus I'm reading that in that bee guy's voice in the Simpsons
"¡AI, AI, AI, no me gusta!"
 
3:22 PM
86
A: June 2023 Data Dump is missing

AMtwo DISCLAIMER: I was recently impacted by the Company's layoff. I am going to carefully respond in a way that ensures I don't reveal anything the Company may feel is confidential--particularly with regard to strategy, or future plans. Any knowledge I have on strategy or future plans is both dated a...

 
GcL
3:35 PM
@SPArcheon lacking moderation they can't sit on their hands. They'll either have to find a substitute or accept the drop in quality... which will eventually lead to further drops in engagement and traffic.
 
3:54 PM
@GcL That's sadly what I don't agree about.
They aren't fully lacking moderation even now because:
- some users continue to curate content
- some mod continue to handle moderation either because a) they don't want to fully leave the site unmoderated or b) they don't support or want to join the strike.
I believe that even if every mod resigned out there are enough users ready to take their place
And if I am correct on that, that is the market advantage the company may be pursuing. ChatGPT only produces an initial answer. Stack produces that answer and then has free volunters curate, rewrite, improve it.
 
GcL
I suspect moderation is sufficiently difficult to do well that the users ready to take their place aren't ready nor equipped for what the responsibility entails. Understaffed moderation I expect will burn out remaining mods in short order.
@SPArcheon Maybe. I find refactoring ai generated solutions to general problems to be like filling in boiler plate. I find refactoring ai generated solution to specific problems to be a huge pain in the ass. Lots of what? and why? that is difficult to wrap your head around.
 
eh, it's more a case of, just as our existing mods learned over time, so too will new ones. however, if we're on a downward trend, and have been for nearly 10 years, a new crop of mods won't fix that. AI generated titles won't fix that. letting more people upvote kinda gets at the root of some of the problems, but I think it's too little too late.
Certainly deciding to do nothing about the flood of AI answers will only make things worse over time.
we already have answerers deciding to just not try anymore because why bother when people are accepting/upvoting ai answers.
 
@KevinB my point is that I am trying to see what the company plan is, can't really find one.
The only possible scheme I see is quite lame
Premises:
- site numbers dropping (number of users, posts etc)
- ChatGPT usage going up
- ChatGPT partially shares the same user-space as the site (people looking for quick answers)
Wrong conclusions:
- ChatGPT is a direct competitor
- to beat ChatGPT we have to stead their userbase and the simplest way to do so is to provide the same thing.
- we also need an advantage to stay on top - that advantage is curation by a set of trained monk... I meant users.
 
4:12 PM
sell data dumps (or data in general). that's the plan, and now that traffic is plummeting they gotta do something about it to be able to rely on selling data dumps far into the future
why they didn't come to the community?
:shrug:
 
@KevinB I don't think that is the only thing.
just a quick comparison, have you ever seen those users that post a fast, placeholder answer just to be the first ones and then edit it to be an actual answer afterwards?
 
rarely
but yes
it used to be a lot more prevalent
 
I think the target is doing the same, with the "placeholder" being the GPT answer so that Stack will be able to say that you get an answer in less than an hour, then wait for the community to post alternatives or curate it.
You will look like having the best of both worlds.
Fast answers and Useful answers
 
i do think that's somewhere they might go, but i doubt it's what they were planning as of a month ago
but if things keep going the way they are...
would ad revenue pay for such a feature?
such a feature would effectively be the same as inlining "LMGTFY"
(the acronym still fits)
 
4:34 PM
@KevinB because what are we gonna do? Strike?
 
GcL
@SPArcheon I don't think the ChatGPT answers that aren't correct or are subtly wrong will get curated nearly as well nor as often as human generated ones. The posters likely won't understand the solution, they're not great to debug, and I suspect some people that would otherwise want to help a person will recognize an ai generated answer and not want to touch it.
I think a likely bad outcome in the near term is that the number of actual subject experts or people with experience will decline and you'll end up with a blind leading the blind kind of forum. Like walking into a conference room of grad students coming up with "solutions". Great for a learning experience, terrible for getting actual production ready solutions.
 
5:15 PM
@GcL I never said it would actually work, just that I can figure some executive thinking it would.
BTW, I just noticed that I haven't done my evil action today yet :P
Give me a second.
Done.
the question has been posted, enjoy.
 
5:34 PM
Hi all, would anyone want to talk to me about where did I go wrong with my post? How could I have achieved the impact that I was after?
-12
Q: Open feedback and questions for Philippe (regarding communication around the AI policy rollout)

LeventeFor context: Philippe, you have published this post, to which, one of my responses was this post. I have received your response in the form of a comment, which, for the sake of a duly structured response, I wish to address here. I will use my observations as the basis for questions that I will po...

As I don't want to commit similar mistakes in the future.
 
6:10 PM
Also, now that the post is removed from the feed on the front page, through downvotes, do I have a chance to see a response from Philippe?
 
that certainly makes it less likely
my first impressionof your question is... i'm a page and a half down and i've yet to find a question, or a statement that i can draw any opinion whatsoever on
> I'm sorry if my writing style was in some way triggering
you're not wrong that that is a non-apology, but also i see no reason for him to need to apologize for his writing style.
(it's also not necessarily his, given the entire post was more or less copy pasted from a post by someone else)
> I expect anyone in the role of VP of Community at SE to be familiar with this knowledge.
so?
again he had no reason to apologize at all.
The thing you are accusing him would in fact be "stupid", given the audience he's communicating with
so i don't quite get the issue with that part of your question.
the entire post seems to be just attempting to pick a fight to pick a fight, with no aims of actually accomplishing anything other than attacking someone.
 
That said, I will play devil advocate on a tangential thing there.
 
it's a distraction
 
That post is full of high voted answers. Including the excellent one posted by starball. And they answer the one downvoted and deleted (probably afterward) post???
AAAAAAARGHGHHHHHHHH
 
@SPArcheon indeed! I think his only other comment addresses Shog9
But the issues that I raised can carry a significance. He is the person who is threatening to ruin the platform with AI content. Wouldn't it be in also y'all's interest if he pulled his conduct together?
If he took this community as seriously as the issue necessitates?
 
6:25 PM
none of the issues you've brought forward indicate that he isn't.
other actions that the company has (or has neglected) to do speak to that far better
be happy we got a response at all, who cares if some of the wording is weird.
 
and to be clear, I am just annoyed that the other posts that actually made very relevant counterarguments got none
 
@KevinB I feel that tribalism contributes a lot to the consensus over such sweeping conclusions.
And I also feel, watch this, that when he commented on my post but not on others' his motivation might have been to playing into driving this tribalistic sentiment.
@SPArcheon ^^
 
your post was easy low hanging fruit to respond to
 
@KevinB And the only one that enabled him a chance to boost his popularity in the community without committing to anything that the constructive people requested.
 
btw, we got a response on the data dump, but it's what we already knew, so
 
6:30 PM
He won your hearts, without offering anything in return.
 
I mean, now you're just assuming how we feel about the response
 
9 hours ago, by Mithical
The strike is... striking. :) We're selecting people to negotiate with SE, although I don't expect much "negotiation" to happen, since our representatives are hopefully going to stick to the demands that we've outlined several times.
 
I haven't read his response to your post
 
@KevinB I seem to see it in the votes I receive.
@KevinB It's included in my new, already downvoted post from a few hours ago.
 
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ i honestly don't care. your concerns in this case are irrelevant
 
6:34 PM
Look, I may work on turning the questions at the bottom of this failed post into a separate, constructive post that is focusing only on the relevant considerations.
And thank you for the feedback.
 
@Levente but stop addressing specific people, be it users or staff. That's just wrong.
Address the company, its management.
 
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack Brilliant, I will remember, and will make a strong effort.
 
@Levente cheers!
And the line of lies continue, here. They have no shame.
 
@ShadowWizardStrikesBack apropos company: I feel that they are crowdsurfing on us without our explicit consent :)
(the implicit consent however, being that we are still here)
 
@Levente yeah that's obvious now. But still, it's several people doing it, and even if one is leading, with all the justified anger, would be wrong to name call or address only them. (Might be females in senior management, that's another thing they don't reveal, the exact staff.)
e.g. never knew about the CTO who just popped up in response to catching SE red handed with killing the data dump.
 
6:55 PM
Apropos:
What is happening with the new AI policy, and ban on effective moderating?
Is that still in effect?
Are we still striking, network wide?
 
nothing significant has changed there, other than we're moving in the direction of beginning more... purposeful communication
aka selecting representatives and planning for them to meet with stack
 
@Levente 1. We don't really know. The currently public policy says to use a lot of care when choosing to delete AI answers. The private policy is something like, "Don't delete AI content for being AI, or if you do, act like that's not the reason". So... who knows.
2. Yes.
3. Yes
 
@KevinB are we planning to announce if/when we deem the strike to end officially?
In the meanwhile, I'm gone on strike, I wish y'all all the best.
And I especially thank y'all for your time devoted to teaching me a lesson on communication.
 
@Levente note that the letter mentioned "until the AI policy is reverted"
 
@MetaAndrewT. Hm, I suspect, it may end up turning into some form of compromise, though...
That is, if someone manages to find something that is practically viable and is acceptable for the volunteers too.
 
7:10 PM
I suspect it will end in a combination of some form of "compromise" and a general exodus of people who no longer feel the network is worth bothering with.
compromising on allowing AI answers to run wild is certainly one that many wouldn't stand for, for example. and there's most certainly a lot of changes coming down the line to finally address some of the long-term issues, however many, like myself, feel these changes are too little too late; we've had 10 years of decline, waiting till the decline increases 10fold to do anything about it is... irresponsible.
 
@KevinB Absolutely. Which is sad, because I feel that it should be preventable.
 
(that and it sounds like the community is continuing to be kept out of the loop on these presumably upcoming changes, other than mentioning them to the mods where it can't be shared with the community)
 
there should be a non-profit foundation, headed by a _totally_ new set of leadership.
Prosus could (should) donate SE to non-profit.
Someone should organize it. :)
 
i do understand why it's so hard to do anything about this problem
 
 
7:16 PM
a lot of the changes that would need to be made to solve the... people want to use it as a help desk but it doesn't work as a help desk, would be particularly negatively received by the most vocal of the community who want the network to be the knowledgebase we were told it was when we joined
 
Prosus should admit that they don't see it viable to get their ROI without fatally damaging the platform.
From that point on, the door would open to percieve the collective human dignity that is at stake here.
@KevinB There is still enough competent people around to define a reasonable way forward.
 
possibly, but can we ever bring back all those that we've lost?
 
The key seems to be to reignite, to keep the embers of passion, of trust, glowing.
 
disconnecting the community from the business could certainly bring some people back, with a sense of hope for things being better, but we'd still be left with the same problems that brought us to this point
 
Do you mean the exodus after Monica?
If it would be turned into a non-profit, with a trustworthy management, many of those, I expect, would be more than excited to return.
 
7:20 PM
no, i mean the constant drain we've had for the past 10 years, and then the plummet since december. There's certainly an argument to be made that the december drop can be reversed if it was indeed caused by the 30 min limit on answering by new users
by removing that limit, we'd get a new set of new answerers later this year and pick right back up. but we're still left with the problems we had before all of this, and that is we aren't built to be the helpdesk people use us for
 
Oh, I meant the army of those brilliant and sophisticated people who exited after the Monica case.
People like them would be the main attraction to a site that I would care about.
 
eh
i'm more in favor of attracting new talent, than retaining old talent that grew tired of answering.
they aren't generating value
 
@KevinB I looked at your profile to find out which specific community may inspire your stance, and found ... nothing O_O
?
 
SO is the only community i care about
teh site, not the company that stole the community's name
 
@KevinB Ok, that's pretty much different from all the SE's that I appreciate most. :)
I am attracted to this network most for the opportunity of learning as entertainment, and for personal development.
 
7:26 PM
that's why i joined, i was learning through solving other people's problems. Helping others and building a reputation was a nice bonus
 
@KevinB That's brutally clear that the company is an unworthy custodian of this wealth of [everything human].
@KevinB Helping others also enhances and deepens your own skill. (ah, that's what you said too :D)
 
but i'm past helping others in the form of answering, i get nothing of value from that anymore
i find it more annoying now, than motivating, to help someone do something they coulda figured out with a google search
 
@KevinB and therefore... ?
 
and therefor i participate through mostly meta and chat now.
i'm not producing value, in other words
 
You are chatting in here, exactly, you are here also for the human aspect.
 
7:28 PM
the value i produced still exists, of course
 
You are producing value, here, for your own personality. (Just like I do for mine.)
This, I mourn more than the actual knowledge, if it gets lost.
 
these are answer rates by year of joining
the most identifyable trend here is that the most active answerers are new users
it falls off over time
if we aren't attracting new users, and they don't feel appreciated/part of the network and aren't growing with the network, there's no reason for them stick around
 
@KevinB That's very insightful.
People, it seems, like you described yourself earlier, "burn out" from particpation. Even if they keep hangin around.
 
7:48 PM
There is a notion here however, that I don't seem to like.
On one hand, it's clear how one connects one's conduct and contributions to the feasibility of the existence of the entire platform, with its costs, servers, employees, and all.
On the other hand, it encourages people to look at themselves, and equally bad, at each other with imaginary "price tags" on.
As in, how much are you / am I worth? How much have you / have I contributed?
Who has earned their keep, who hasn't?
That's ... unattractive, alienating.
 
eh, i'm using a different definition of value IMO, but it's not far off
there's certainly "value", obviously so given recent events, in users flagging/closing/curating content
both to the community and the company
with or without us doing it, it needs to be done so by us not doing it now the company is spending paid employee time to do it.
but i wasn't talking about that value, per se
that's definitely a necessary part of it, but we can't exist as a community long-term if we aren't replacing those that step away or stop producing content, for whatever reason
even if they stick around and curate the incoming content
 
@KevinB I feel now that if I don't spend the hours on contributing, then I should at least shut up instead of making noise just for the sake of it... :|
Which is new to me; I need to give it time to consider it.
 
i mean, everyone's free to provide their opinion on it, if they can do so in a respectful and constructive manner, πŸ˜‰
whether "contributing" or otherwise
being against the company because they're a company is an unsolvable position
 
@KevinB question is, can anyone change the company?
Because as they are, clearly, falls short of the..., of what it takes.
 
if it wants to be
i think it's fairly clear at this point that we'll at least see a few good changes occur soon, like lifting the 30 min limit on new answers, and maybe some additional leeway on handling ai content (or at minimum a publicly available policy so that users can decide for themselves how to react to it)
i think at minimum we need far more clear statistics on how much AI generated content is actually being posted on the network, as a baseline
how we get that... i don't know, but what was used for the existing results is clearly lacking
it'd be quite troubling if 80% of the new users we got this round simply copy/pasted gpt content
not unsolvable though
 
8:07 PM
Number one requirement would be honesty and transparency on SE's part.
 
i'd call it transparency
i don't think they've actually lied... but they've certainly neglected to inform quite a bit in the past 6 months in particular
 
They are intimidated by the community's intellect though.
 
and their outrage
 
that's just a consequence of consistently being ignored. not surprising.
 
I'm starting to like SE on desktop rather then mobile. They really need to come out with another app that can do all commands that the desktop/search can do on mobile web and desktop
 
8:13 PM
Also, an intellectual entity has powers.
That shouldn't surprise SE.
That's what they signed up for, when they set out to manage this company.
Why are being surprised and intimidated by it?
 
i imagine it's quite frustrating
they as a company have their own goals that are separate from the community
 
This was a weird concept from the get-go.
Get people together and enable them to develop each other.
"Ooops, now they got developed... what now?"
 
for example, improvements to teams, and making collectives profitable
 
Yeah, money.
An experiment that proved harmful.
But if one takes a single glance at capitalism, it should have not been surprising whatsoever.
It's akin to controlling, limiting, jealous parents, who don't want to allow their children to develop.
 
i always found it odd how the community isn't ever really... monetized past ads. and i don't mean subscriptions or paid answers, rather, the jobs product, for example,
the jobs thing was huge for bringing in new people
and encouraging taking part of the gamification bits, like earning rep and tag badges to prove your abilties
 
8:18 PM
How can you know how our data is getting (or not) monetized?
 
well, we know it is, right now, because they've told us as much
our data is being used to enhance various ads, that's been a thing for a decade at least
that's something they were always open about
they didn't necessarily sell our data, they sold ad slots that were enhanced by it.
(and always supported our ability to block them)
 
I signed up for the credibility that I percieved Joel Spolsky and Jeff Atwood lent to the platform.
Their being creators was the testimony that I accepted in order to start contributing to other SE sites outside of AskUbuntu (that I subscribed to initially).
I feel so terribly let down by those two.
 
 
2 hours later…
9:57 PM
@EleezatheOtherWorldWizard How's your exams going?
 
@ElementsinSpace Going alright so far, three down, five to go
Today I had a physics exam and it went way better than I expected
 
@EleezatheOtherWorldWizard Eight exams in total seems like lot. I don't remember having to do that many. I'm glad you went well in physics.
I used to love physics.
 
10:12 PM
@ElementsinSpace Yeah, A Levels has a lot of exams... Three for maths, three for physics, two for compsci
The exam today was weird because
It was physics paper 2 (paper 1 was two weeks ago)
P1 is usually way easier because the content is easier, and I usually really struggle with P2 content
But for some reason today's paper was way easier than the first one
 
Maybe you just knew the content better.
I never did comp-sci at high school, which programming languages do you get to learn?
 
@ElementsinSpace In my school we learned Python at GCSE and Pascal at A Level
I've always stuck with Python though
 
@EleezatheOtherWorldWizard I haven't got any experience with Pascal, but I've used Python a little bit; it's relatively friendly.
 
10:29 PM
@ElementsinSpace Pascal is pretty old and rather obsolete (at least my class thinks so), we learned it in A Level so that we'd all have a fresh start with a new language and so nobody's already ahead
 
10:52 PM
This will be my first Happy Hour
 
@EleezatheOtherWorldWizard I've some experience with perhaps a dozen programming languages, and they're all useful for something, even if just for providing a different way of thinking β€” the more tools/languages you have; the better.
 
What happens with happy hour? Everything looks the same
 
11:08 PM
@BigJoe I have no idea.
@BigJoe Did your bug get fixed? I think I saw it had [status-review].
 
11:23 PM
@ElementsinSpace it’s fixed but @Tinkeringbell said they will keep the status-review in case it breaks again
 

« first day (4692 days earlier)      last day (322 days later) »