Reviewer: 300 reviews, over 60 actioned.
(possibly) Scrutiniser: 1000 reviews, over 300 actioned.
Where actioned is:
Edit (suggested edits don't count until approved)
Flagged (only counts if the flag is marked as valid/helpful).
Voted to close (only counts if the question is closed).
Voted U...
Differently, you would see a sentence saying that when you get the "S&W" badge you would be able to see your statistics, followed by a number that says how much edits you still have to do to get the "S&W" badge.
@BenBrocka Well, you are not allowed to review your posts, except in the case they are voted to be closed, but in that case you should be a 10k user, and see the "close" tab in the review page.
@kiamlaluno That's what I was wondering, I think I just thought I had more edits because of editing my own posts. I'm not an editing demon on SO like I am UX
@TimStone I'm wondering about question on IDE's (e.g. how do I get syntax highlighting in such and such IDE). they aren't really programming questions but are they acceptable?
@BenBrocka If you look at the page that lists the edits done (I think it's the "editors" page), that counts the edits on your own posts, or on CW posts. Those edits are not counted for the "S&W" badge, or I would have two of them. :-)
@Joseph Yeah, IDEs are "software tools commonly used by programmers," making such questions acceptable per the FAQ. Also, see this related question. Depending on the specific nature of the question it could also live on another site, but in a vast majority of cases posting it on Stack Overflow is fine.
I think it'd be a cool feature to be able to offer cash as a bounty... For example, keep the bounties working like they do, but also add an option to add a cash reward on top of the reputation points. So either way you sacrifice reputation points. On that topic, if having certain amounts of reputation could be converted into cool rewards like SO mouse pads, flash drives, etc, that'd be super awesome.
I have an idea for dealing with a question you badly want to be answered, which no one will answer, even after you've offered a large bounty: cash.
Users can offer cash, and whoever has the accepted answer can be paid, possibly via PayPal.
Does this sound like a good idea?
@PopularDemand It's not your fault: My posts are automagically deleted. I am a M.I.B. agent, and the tracks I leave behind me are removed when I leave. Nobody remember seeing me, or noticing me in any way.
Even if some of my posts are left, nobody notices them. ;-)
However, we recalled all of them to make just the big network-wide chat.stackexchange. However still, Meta and Stack Overflow grew very large in those short times. Rather than break everything in migration and such, we let them live
Okay, we have made a change to the logic that we hope to be the best way to go.
"@marc" will always be considered a match for your user name, in the sense that it will be highlighted if you look at the transcript etc. (following the "party" logic in my other answer).
However, in most cases, "@m...
^^^ details on time-constraints for @-mentions
But of course, if it doesn't work as described, Detective Rchern is on the case
Those are most likely the order I'll vote. Notice that I don't put my own name on that list. I should, huh? Like I told the guys on dba.se during elects, if you can't vote for yourself, what was the point in running?
I think that we've let ourselves get distracted from the real goal here, which is to peer pressure @PopularDemand into nominating. I mean, per his name, it's clearly What the People Want.
@PopularDemand You're correct. What you represent is the popular demand. Which means that your assertion that @TimStone needs to run is all that we need as proof that he should.
Seriously, if you two run I'm rounding the three of us as a ticket -
What does it mean when the "user-details" block of a "user card" of an answer has a name but no link, no reputation, and no badges?
For example: on this answer by "Peter" on Mar 8 '09 at 14:26
I want to be able to transfer things back and forth between Database Administrators and Stack Overflow, I want to be able to see crap on Meta Stack Overflow without having to get to 10k, and I want to have mod powers over the remaining two chat servers. I think that sums it up.
@jcolebrand I think that discussion is perhaps the required tag most directly related to moderating, and it's the one I have the lowest activity in. ;)
Reviewer: 300 reviews, over 60 actioned.
(possibly) Scrutiniser: 1000 reviews, over 300 actioned.
Where actioned is:
Edit (suggested edits don't count until approved)
Flagged (only counts if the flag is marked as valid/helpful).
Voted to close (only counts if the question is closed).
Voted U...
I have an idea for dealing with a question you badly want to be answered, which no one will answer, even after you've offered a large bounty: cash.
Users can offer cash, and whoever has the accepted answer can be paid, possibly via PayPal.
Does this sound like a good idea?
Okay, we have made a change to the logic that we hope to be the best way to go.
"@marc" will always be considered a match for your user name, in the sense that it will be highlighted if you look at the transcript etc. (following the "party" logic in my other answer).
However, in most cases, "@m...
What does it mean when the "user-details" block of a "user card" of an answer has a name but no link, no reputation, and no badges?
For example: on this answer by "Peter" on Mar 8 '09 at 14:26
