« first day (1605 days earlier)      last day (2539 days later) » 

5:00 PM
D'oh, I found the bug.
 
!eval (function(){return this})()
 
Good for the other devs on your team
 
No will eval
 
@IlmariKaronen Botling stats: Utility: 0% Annoyance: 100%
 
If you use botling, don't be annoyed when it realizes you used it.
 
5:03 PM
@InfiniteHappiness Well truth to be told for a moment our great Unofficial Stack Overflow Path creator managed to get the utility rate up by 5%...
Keyword: for a moment
 
@ProgramFOX Done
 
Thanks!
 
We use smileys in chat, don't write a botling that takes smileys. Other bots have explicit invocation sequences, LOOK AND LEARN
 
I disabled that, yeesh.
 
Thanks :)
 
5:08 PM
Be happier! It's the holiday season!
No, EVEN HAPPIER!
:P
 
Still same error @bjb568
 
Did you restart front.js?
 
@bjb568 Ehh... I didn't even run that. I only did node buildpage.js.
 
Well, you need to do sudo node front and node buildpage.
Buildpage just talks to front.
 
ohh... ok
 
5:12 PM
:)
 
!eval CHAT.GENERIC_ERROR
hmm, did the botling die, or does it just not like me anymore? :)
 
If it errors, it doesn't bother to report.
want bjb time
 
Wait, did I really say Path? I mean Patch, sorry :(
 
12:14
@Unihedro lel
 
ah, cool, let me just keep trying to poke holes in it, then :)
!eval setTimeout
 
5:15 PM
function setTimeout() {
[native code]
}
 
!eval setTimeout = function() {}
 
function () {}
 
O_o
 
!eval setTimeout = function() { return "Hello!"; }
 
function () { return "Hello!"; }
 
5:17 PM
!eval setTimeout
 
!eval setTimeout()
 
!eval thisisatest = 'asdf';
function () { return "Hello!"; }
!eval thisisatest = 'asdf';
No will eval
 
ugh, rate limiting
 
!eval n=1,f=function () {return"!e"+"val n="+(n+1)+",f="+f+";f(f)";};f()
 
!eval n=2,f=function () {return"!e"+"val n="+(n+1)+",f="+f+";f(f)";};f(f)
!eval n=4,f=function () {return"!e"+"val n="+(n+1)+",f="+f+";f(f)";};f(f)
!eval n=5,f=function () {return"!e"+"val n="+(n+1)+",f="+f+";f(f)";};f(f)
 
5:18 PM
!eval setTimeout()
 
Hello!
 
:O
Hmm...
 
!eval setInterval("d=do"+"cument,e=d.createEvent('MouseEvents'); e.initEvent('click',true,true); d.querySelector('#leave').dispatchEvent(e)",1000)
 
:O
 
2068
hallo
 
5:18 PM
:DDD
 
@IlmariKaronen Oh my god!
 
>:D
 
Our new hero!
Heap heap array!
... I'm crying, for some weird reason.
 
Blocked.
 
NOOOOOOOO
I feel like we're playing code bowling here, trying to get stuff done under many restrictions
!eval setInterval("d=do"+"cument,e=d.createEvent('MouseEvents'); e.initEvent('click',true,true); d.querySelector('#leave').dispatchEvent(e)",1000)
 
5:20 PM
No will eval
You know, eval can be used for constructive things.
!eval Math.random()
0.20708551304414868
 
@bjb568 Still same error, even when running front.js.
 
There. Constructive.
 
@bjb568 You mean "constructive" like anyone would actually get anything useful out of a public library computer?
 
!eval setTimeout("d=do"+"cument,e=d.createEvent('MouseEvents'); e.initEvent('click',true,true); d.querySelector('#leave').dispatchEvent(e)",1000)
 
@ProgramFOX You're requesting port 80?
 
5:21 PM
@bjb568 8000, as your code says.
 
@Unihedro Nobody goes to library.
@ProgramFOX … use port 80.
 
> front.js running on port 80
 
@bjb568 If you take a visit to the library you'll see that at least one person goes to the library, therefore your claim is invalid.
 
@Unihedro Nobody goes to the library. It's too crowded.
 
5:24 PM
IT WORKS! \o/
@bjb568 How can it be crowded if nobody goes there, hm?
 
:D
that's the joke
 
... Such dry humor
much wow
very impress
totally amuse
 
have fun ;)
 
Well the only "constructive" thing to use eval for would be this:
 
5:26 PM
Yay one-boxing!
 
@bjb568 Your confirmation mail thingy is still borked as I don't receive a mail when signing up. How do I manually tell the DB that I can be trusted?
 
I watched that cat thing. It was great.
 
Never trust a fox! :P
 
ಠ_ಠ
3
 
@ProgramFOX db.users.update({}, {$set: {rep:50,level:1},$unset:{confirm:1}})
 
5:28 PM
k, cool. Do I have to provide a name or something?
 
If you only have one user, no.
 
Make sure you did use DevDoodle
:2831130 Do lai ay mong!
I don't remember how to do pingying, but I tried
 
:joy:
 
@bjb568 How do I create a chatroom?
 
5:30 PM
:joy:
 
\o/
 
Also, when I try to create a question on my DD copy, it says "please fill out this field", pointing to an invisible field.
 
detects fun, grabs popcorn
 
@ProgramFOX Which browser?
 
@bjb568 Firefox 31.0 on Ubuntu.
 
5:32 PM
Oh, ok.
 
am disappointed to see no fun, only DD devs trying to set up the site, quietly walks away and reads a book
 
yes, they should take the debugging to the sandbox or some other room... but we aren't so lucky
 
Where's Pham?
 
looks around in confusion
 
@Unihedro It better be an ebook.
 
5:35 PM
!eval location.replace("http://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ")
 
@bjb568 That's an outright lie. In fact, you've been to the library before!
 
No will eval
 
!eval return;
 
!eval location.replace
 
5:36 PM
... ??? . huh? what happened?
 
No will eval
 
Why did my page refresh?
 
but where is @Pham, @uni?
 
!eval return true;
 
... oh no
 
5:37 PM
!eval "Hi!"
 
Hi!
 
My page didn't refresh
 
@Unihedro Hmm?
 
7 mins ago, by ProgramFOX
@bjb568 How do I create a chatroom?
@bjb568 ^ halp!
 
You need to give yourself more repz.
 
5:38 PM
oh, cool
 
200, at least.
Pushed some bug fixes.
 
@bjb A crash when creating a room:
 
Uh oh
 
/home/programfox/DevDoodle/front.js:830
					dbcs.chatrooms.find().sort({_id: -1}).limit(1).next(function(err, last) {
					                                               ^
TypeError: Object #<Cursor> has no method 'next'
    at IncomingMessage.<anonymous> (/home/programfox/DevDoodle/front.js:830:53)
    at IncomingMessage.emit (events.js:92:17)
    at _stream_readable.js:943:16
    at process._tickCallback (node.js:419:13)
 
wat
 
5:44 PM
@ProgramFOX @bjb568: Would you mind creating a different room for debugging DD? Pham, Smokey and others have their own rooms for devs to discuss debugging. Tavern may not be the right place for such discussions.
 
Hm… we could go to DevDoodle chat.
 
Well... let's create a DD room for this then.
 
@bjb568 Please create a room there, I don't have enough rep.
 
Ugh, it's borked.
Oh, I'm not logged in :P
 
5:47 PM
!eval parent["lo"+"cation"]
 
No will eval
Oh, it is borked tho.
 
curser, foiled again! ;)
!eval parent
 
!eval self
 
No will eval
 
5:48 PM
 
!eval (new Function("return th"+"is"))()
 
No will eval
@Pham What's the precent mean?
 
!eval window["Fun"+"ct"+"ion"]
 
No will eval
 
!eval window["Fun"+"ct"+"ion"].name
 
5:57 PM
Window is disallowed.
No will eval
 
!eval (function(){return this})()
 
No will eval
 
What's illegal here?
 
this
 
huh...
 
5:58 PM
!eval constructor
 
No will eval
No will eval
 
!eval global
!eval ({})
 
!eval proto
 
[object Object]
 
good.
!eval Function
 
6:00 PM
No will eval
 
!eval (function(){}).constructor
 
No will eval
 
!eval (function(){})["con"+"st"+"ructor"]
 
function Function() {
[native code]
}
 
ha!
 
6:01 PM
:D
 
Sigh…
 
!eval (function(){})["con"+"st"+"ructor"]("ale"+"rt("+"'ha')")
 
function anonymous() { alert('ha');
}
 
!eval (function(){})["con"+"st"+"ructor"]("ale"+"rt("+"'ha')")()
 
!eval 1+1
 
6:02 PM
one down, one to go
 
Seems like the bot won't do anything until @bjb568 closes the alert window.
 
Fixed
Nobody needs functions, right?
 
false
 
:P
!eval Array.join.constructor
No will eval
 
!eval (function(){})["con"+"st"+"ructor"]("ale"+"rt("+"1)")
 
6:04 PM
!eval 1.0.toString["con"+"st"+"ructor"]("ale"+"rt("+"'ha')")()
 
I knew that'd happen.
 
!eval 1+1
 
2
 
... I just realized the most effective way to kill the bot.
 
Why would you want to kill me? ;(
 
6:04 PM
!eval ({"foo":"bar"})["co"+"nst"+"ruc"+"tor"][""+"_pr"+"o"+"to"+"_"]["co"+"nst"+"ruc‌​"+"tor"]("lo"+"cation.repl"+"ace('ht"+"tp://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ')")()
 
NO KILL
 
@bjb568 Oh, you so need to be kicked for that. :P
@IlmariKaronen Is someone getting rickrolled here?
 
I... guess so?
 
dunno, depends on if that worked
!eval 1+2
 
Huh.
Oh, found the problem.
!eval ({"foo":"bar"})["co"+"nst"+"ruc"+"tor"][""+"pr"+"o"+"to"+""]["co"+"nst"+"ruc‌​‌​"+"tor"]("lo"+"cation.repl"+"ace('ht"+"tp://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ')")()
\o/
 
6:06 PM
Watching the rickroll?
 
hallo
Hallo!
Nope!
 
!eval ({"foo":"bar"})["co"+"nst"+"ruc"+"tor"][""+"_pr"+"o"+"to"+"_"]["co"+"nst"+"ruc‌​‌​"+"tor"]("lo"+"cation.repl"+"ace('ht"+"tp://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ')")()
 
Low Quality A (100%): Same thing happened to me, no idea, would also like to know, by Rajon Mondo, on gaming.stackexchange.com.
 
6:07 PM
!eval ({"foo":"bar"})["co"+"nst"+"ruc"+"tor"]["_"+"_pr"+"o"+"to_"+"_"]["co"+"nst"+‌​"ruc"+"tor"]("return 123")()
 
@3ventic sigh
 
!eval ({"foo":"bar"})["co"+"nst"+"ruc"+"tor"]["_"+"_pr"+"o"+"to_"+"_"]["co"+"nst"+‌​"ruc"+"tor"]("return 123")()
 
Sometimes when entering the tavern I feel like I'm surrounded by bots.
 
stackoverflow.com/a/19290223/2581872 (so the question can be roomba'd)
 
6:14 PM
it has negative score, don't worry
 
@JanDvorak It was at +2 before these downvotes.
 
oh. Fine then
 
@3ventic so true
room topic changed to Tavern on the Meta: MY GOD, IT'S FULL OF STARS AND BOTS! Wheel of blame link bolted on for your ease of use: jsfiddle.net/Ldvwp8uv/1/embedded/result [bug] [crickets] [discussion] [excuses] [support] [waffles]
2
 
:D
 
lol
 
6:24 PM
Bots, not botlings!
I gotta go for the night, enjoy yourselves!
 
Night!
 
didn't add - no one was reviewing Pham's reports anyway :P
 
I was doing DD debugging...
 
night :)
 
7:06 PM
DevDoodle is up! Yay
 
\o/
 
 
2 hours later…
9:15 PM
Huh, okay
 
user259867
9:26 PM
PSA: UTC Saturday begins in about 2.5 hours. Time to start looking for answerable questions, if you want Bill Lumbergh hat.
 
10:10 PM
@SmokeDetector false
 
@hichris123 Registered as false positive and added title to Bayesian doctype 'good'.
 
user259867
10:23 PM
Now that Inf can change the room topic, it may be time to update the Wheel of Blame.
 
11:00 PM
@Inf's an owner? Scary.
2
But better than if it was....
not gonna say
 
11:16 PM
@bjb568 But jQuery is amazing!
 
Except no.
 
@bjb568 Syntax Error: Phrase is not valid English.
 
@hichris123 NO
 
@bjb568 Syntax Error: Phrase is not valid English.
 
@hichris123 NAAAAAW, DOOOOD
 
11:19 PM
@bjb568 Syntax Error: Phrase is not valid anything.
 
:)
 
!eval "this thing still on?"
 
No will eval
 
Syntax Error: @bjb568 is not a valid cat.
 
!eval 1
 
11:21 PM
1
@hichris123 D:
 
!eval "Hello."
 
Hello.
 
!eval "Hello?"
 
Hello?
halloa!
Hallo!
 
11:24 PM
!eval "I am a dog in real life."
ratelimit?
!eval "I am a dog in real life."
okay now everyone star that
awwwww
:)
 
:)
 
we just need to find a way to make something that looks fine for two minutes so he won't delete it
 
Or wait until I'm asleep or AFK somehow.
 
!eval bjb's AFK
 
!eval owner.AFK?
 
11:31 PM
@Braiam … Y U NO JS?
 
Is there a query to find how much rep I've made in a certain time period, such as 100 days ago to present?
 
Probably. But won't be 100% accurate.
 
You can kind of fudge it with SEDE, but not exactly.
 
@bjb568 I couldn't find one.
on sede
I don't know how to write one either.
 
You could go to /reputation and practice mental arithmetic.
 
11:35 PM
takes too long.
 
@Frank you sure? Just go back to 100 days ago on /reputation and see what the number says.
 
@UndotheSnowman where?
 
<site>/reputation
 
user259867
@Frank Go to your network profile reputation tab. Mouse over the day you want.
 
user259867
Wolfram Alpha says 100 days ago was September 17.
 
11:46 PM
I see. thx
 
user259867
One can also get all the daily rep numbers by looking at the source of the page, but it's probably better to have a bookmarklet or script for this kind of task. I might get to it after I finish debugging some other things.
 
I flagged this one stackoverflow.com/a/27605660/1699210 as NAA on a boutied question, since it's accepted an additional other flag should be superfluous, or did I miss something
 
@bjb568 How about number of answer and/or questions per time period.
 
idk
 
user259867
@bummi "other" flag may help in the sense that you can give a convincing reason.
 
11:53 PM
Luckily this wasn't asked on motorvehicles.se: bricks.stackexchange.com/questions/4879/…
 
lol
what a low effort question.
 
user259867
@Frank Advanced search can do it with "created" parameter. Example
 
True. Nice. I feel dumb now.
 
@Behaviour mhhhh I think it has to be handled be Mod's anyway and the reason seems to be more than obvios, shy away to use two flags
 
user259867
@Frank NP, I did not know about "created" parameter until a few weeks ago. It's not listed in the sidebar of advanced search page; one has to click through to the full explanation.
 

« first day (1605 days earlier)      last day (2539 days later) »