« first day (3463 days earlier)      last day (1551 days later) » 

1:30 AM
@djsmiley2kTMW CMs can still handle them, and relevant automated functions would still work for non-custom flags (e.g. upon multiple spam or rude/abusive flags):
276
Q: What are the “spam” and “rude or abusive” (offensive) flags, and how do they work?

KipWhen flagging, there are two special case options: spam and rude or abusive. What is spam, and when should I flag content as such? What is considered offensive, rude or abusive content? How does the spam flag differ from the rude or abusive flag? What is the effect of these special flags? When ...

 
@V2Blast assuming there's a CM looking at the site
there's a ton of sites that have lost all their mods, and precious little manpower on the CM side of things
 
@JourneymanGeek Well, yes. But I figured that went without saying.
I said "CMs can handle them", not "will handle them", for a reason :P
 
but flagging is good anyway
it indicates that people are using the site, and hopefully gives a little more weight to the folks who're pushing for more resources to the community.
Or the site gets closed down
which is not good :D
 
1:45 AM
We actually have a tool that shows the current flag count on all sites so we can spot check.
 
Or that :D
(but this is information I did not have)
 
I don’t think anyone knows.
 
@Catija well - its a bit of a perfect storm :/
 
Rob
I was going to write that on beta sites pre-mod that a CM shows up every couple of days and goes through the site, including handling flags and approving Wiki Tag edits (because everyone's rep is too low to approve), but I couldn't find anything on Meta to support my assertion.
 
@Rob that wouldn't be inaccurate
on young sites - even SU, CMs are critical in getting the site generally set up
Animuson and others had a huge role in setting the initial site culture on SR.SE, SU pretty much was Jeff's baby in the early days...
 
1:59 AM
@Rob That’s a big part of what Robert did.
 
Rob
We understand that you are short-handed, so now it might take a week, instead of less than 2 days (and rarely 3, previously).
@Catija I asked Jnat if the Wiki Edit privilege could be greatly reduced so the top half dozen users could approve edits instead of waiting for a CM (I didn't fall under the list of included persons, and they were glad to lower the priv.). For flagging that's not going to work. Instead of only "a tool that shows the current flag count" it would be great if it could show a single flag that no one has looked at and is two days old - that would catch orphan flags.
 
@Rob if its 'simple' flags, maybe
but a lot of flags have nuance and PII. ANd you'd need to see who posted a flag which is both useful and dangerous
 
Rob
2:17 AM
I did intend to write "single" and the notification would be to a CM, whom can see all that anyways.
It was Catija whom wrote the message, and said that they had a tool; to which I suggested the minor upgrade.
 
There's no notifications, though... we have to actually think about checking it.
Two days is... kinda a short time. There's some flags that mods intentionally ignore for a while.
 
Rob
2:32 AM
Hehe, I thought the ignored flags were waiting to go upstairs.
 
@Rob ignoring is passive not active :D
 
Rob
I think it's helpful to tell the user something. Over at CHQ we try to handle complaints immediately and investigate them thoroughly, often for over a half hour and by two to six people. --- Even if we deny the complaint (short of "proof" is a common reason) we are certain to thank them for complaining and encourage them to make more complaints of the same type in future. --- Only if it's clearly "not our department" do we discourage the person. --- Great service and customer satisfaction is
our goal.
It's different elsewhere, here.
 
@Rob Ideally I'd love a zero inbox policy for flags
in some cases its a developing situation
or we simply don't know what's the best thing to do
 
Rob
2:51 AM
Here's 'a little bit here, and a little bit there' over a 3 1/2 period culminating in: closing OT, migration rejection, answers deleted, user's other questions deleted, and a custom mod flag for an IP check. --- I'm satisfied and I hope that the person whom complained is too. The person whom wrote the question didn't get their questions deleted because it was "short of suspicious with proof". --- So all sides are hopefully
satisfied (except possibly one of the answerers whom didn't disclose affiliation).
* 3 1/2 hour long period
 
@Rob Ah, there's no way to "ignore" a flag... you just don't handle it.
I've long hoped for a way to... dunno... recuse yourself from handling specific flags which would be indicated to the other mods so they know that they should look at it... or a way to "snooze" a flag so that you can hide the flag for a couple of days.
 
3:17 AM
Kobe Bryant died earlier today in a helicopter crash. According to the NY Times, he and his 13-year-old daughter Gianna were among the 9 people killed in the crash.
The ESPN article also reports that they were on their way to a travel basketball game (for his daughter, I assume), and another player and parent were also on board as well as Orange Coast College baseball coach John Altobelli.
:(
 
Rob
@Catija A pass the buck button, combined with a "the buck stops here" mechanism; so no one looks like a deer caught in the headlights. :)
There were 11 basketball players and coaches the past 26 days:
The following deaths of notable individuals occurred in 2020. Names are reported under the date of death, in alphabetical order by surname or pseudonym. A typical entry reports information in the following sequence: Name, age, country of citizenship at birth, subsequent nationality (if applicable), what subject was noted for, cause of death (if known), and reference. == January == === 27 === === 26 === Maharaj Kishan Bhan, 72, Indian virologist and pediatrician, cancer. Vsevolod Chaplin, 51, Russian Orthodox clergyman. Nathaniel R. Jones, 93, American attorney, Judge of the Court of ...
 
 
4 hours later…
8:05 AM
@V2Blast Who?
(Papers here are full of it too, but as far as I know no-one even plays basketball here)
 
The Netherlands national basketball team (Dutch: Het Nederlands Elftal) represents the Netherlands in international basketball matches. The national team is governed by Basketball Nederland. The Dutch have reached the European Basketball Championship on 15 occasions. Their best results at the event came in 1983, where they finished in fourth place. They have also qualified for the FIBA World Cup once, in 1986. In recent years though, the national team has struggled to maintain consistency to reach major international tournaments. The team represents itself as the Orange Lions. == History... ==
@Tinkeringbell Not quite true.
 
... *sigh*
 
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog I don't think she was being overly literal :D
 
@JourneymanGeek lol
@V2Blast yup a very sad day.... several former-NBA players play in Israel too, one got the bad news in the middle of a game with live broadcast and started to cry. :/
Kobe Bean Bryant (August 23, 1978 – January 26, 2020) was an American professional basketball player. A shooting guard, Bryant played his entire 20-season career in the National Basketball Association (NBA) with the Los Angeles Lakers. He entered the NBA directly from high school and won five NBA championships. Bryant was an 18-time All-Star, 15-time member of the All-NBA Team, 12-time member of the All-Defensive Team, and the 2008 NBA Most Valuable Player (MVP). Widely regarded as one of the greatest basketball players of all time, he led the NBA in scoring during two seasons, ranks fourth on...
TL;DR: a living legend.
 
.... *cough*
 
8:17 AM
!!/tea Mith
 
@Shadow9 brews a cup of earl grey tea for @Mith
 
You need it
 
!!/mocha
 
@Mithical No such command 'mocha'.
 
!!/milk
 
8:17 AM
@Shadow9 No such command 'milk'.
 
:(
 
In any case... the cough was for "living legend".
 
9 people died in that helicopter crash :(
 
arugh co-worker is crunching away this morning
 
@Mithical so you think he wasn't?
 
8:22 AM
@Shadow9 "living"
 
Just third in the all-time NBA scorers... probably more records
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog well, was
 
He was especially popular in the 2000s
 
gonna be honest outside of recognizing the name the only thing I knew about him was the metoo allegations
 
To be honest I never read a lot about him personally, but always heard his name mentioned all around. Heck, only yesterday I read article about his place in the all-time scorers taken by LeBron, and how Bryant congratulated him for that.
 
@Magisch I only knew who he was because of some Family Guy sketch, but I don't watch sports at all anyway :)
 
8:39 AM
@Shadow9 Oof :(
 
@V2Blast are you a basketball fan?
My wife is a big fan of Maccabi Tel Aviv so I don't have much choice. ;)
It's their player that started to cry, she was afraid he'll stop playing but he kept playing and was really good.
Now that's something to admire.
 
@Gimby High five! o/
 
@Tinkeringbell slap
 
hey not fair!
Why you only slap @Tink? :(
 
... well she asked for it
 
8:54 AM
@Gimby High five! \o
 
@Shadow9 HARD SLAP
 
yay!
 
Play nice, you two. No hard slapping, one of you will end up crying.
(I'm starting to sound like my parents :/)
 
Actually, like me.... LOL
Wife usually let them continue until one really cries, I prefer to stop them before. ;)
 
Both my parents were like that... Always trying to prevent trouble ;)
 
8:58 AM
Luckily they rarely hit each other, usually it's just insults thrown at each other.
@Tinkeringbell success rate? ;)
 
@Shadow9 Not really. Was just reacting to your description of how the former NBA players reacted when finding out mid-game on live TV. I can't imagine how rough that would be. Props to the player for being able to hang in there for the team's sake.
 
@Shadow9 Meh.
 
BTW, @Mithical looks like gnat is about to give you 50 rep tomorrow. :)
 
We only got sneakier about hurting each other ;)
 
@Tinkeringbell lol... make sense! :P
 
9:00 AM
@Tinkeringbell I know exactly what you mean. lol
 
@V2Blast yeah... and to make it harder, he just arrived that same day to the team. It's crazy.
 
Wow
That's an intense first day.
 
(well, bit more complicated, he was in the team in the past, left for other Israeli team, etc...)
Huh! He also got Wiki page.
Amar'e Carsares Stoudemire (Hebrew: אמארה סטודמאייר‎; ; born November 16, 1982) is an American-Israeli professional basketball player for Maccabi Tel Aviv of the Israeli Premier League and the EuroLeague. He won the NBA Rookie of the Year Award in 2003 with the Phoenix Suns, who selected him with the ninth overall pick of the 2002 NBA draft. He made six appearances in the NBA All-Star Game and was named to the All-NBA Team five times, including one first-team selection in 2007. Stoudemire played high school basketball for five different schools, ultimately graduating from Cypress Creek High School...
I knew he's good... but not that good. Kudos.
 
@Shadow9 Cool... although I'm basically ignoring rep for now. If I wanted more rep I'd campaign for the repcap to be removed and a recalc to be run ;)
 
@mith are you interested in helping me proofread the summary i'm writing on serial voting?
 
9:06 AM
@Magisch sure
 
@Magisch for Yaakov?
 
yeah
I need a mod or two with prior experience in the area to point out things I missed or misunderstood in there
 
Nice... it's amazing that he's willing to work on that in his spare time.
@Magisch you also got Cody here, no?
 
yeah
it's more difficult then I thought to try and press the topic area of serial voting into something understandable
 
😁
I might have suggested gettng someone with actual access to take a look some time back :D
 
9:27 AM
@JourneymanGeek That's pretty much just staff, and their time is super limited
 
Not if it's Shog... :/
 
@Magisch true but you could have gotten something together in the meanwhile :D
 
Rob
Much like the "Question Ban" or any fairness algorithm the Serial Voting information isn't entirely public knowledge, otherwise everyone would be able to serial vote (up or down). Comments encouraging / campaigning for voting (or reviewing) one way or another fall into the 'serial voting problem' category because those don't usually get reversed or placed on hold.
 
(I'm being mean, ignore me)
 
@JourneymanGeek I'm working on it
It takes significant time to put together and it needs to be good, so an unfiltered stream of thought into text doesn't quite work
 
9:31 AM
@JourneymanGeek mean-while?
 
@Shadow9 grouhy, crochetty...
 
@Magisch But... that's my favorite writing technique! :(
 
@Mithical mine too
 
@Rob We need a system to judge whether or not votes are 'valid'. We had a user posting a bunch of one-line answers on IPS, they went on a literal answering spree... I opened all of them in tabs, read, flagged and downvoted each sentence.... Only to wake up with several answers still being in review but my votes on them reversed :/
I still find that unfair.
 
I'm bout to suggest a framework that would allow mods to review vote invalidations
maybe that could be possible if the stars align
 
9:38 AM
@Magisch On small sites that may work... on large ones it might be a looooot of noise?
 
not if you filter it properly
 
I suspect it would work fine anywhere short of SO
which is a problem on its own :D
 
@Tinkeringbell flagged?? Aren't you a mod there?
 
@Shadow9 Probably not always :D
 
hehe
 
9:42 AM
@Shadow9 That was before I was a mod... I don't even think I knew about vote reversal before it happened...
 
Being made a mod is how they deal with people who flag correctly too much :D
 
@JourneymanGeek Kinda feels like 'always' though...
 
@Tinkeringbell well you know now ;)
 
@Shadow9 Yeah, I learned ;)
 
@Tinkeringbell I've only been one 5 years. I'm sure some folks assume I came with the furniture :D
 
9:43 AM
@JourneymanGeek *looks at Andy* fair enough
 
@JourneymanGeek skepticism
 
@JourneymanGeek I'm sure @Bart was already member of Stack Exchange before Jeff and Joel even planned it. ;)
 
looks at pile of work I produced for CMs
 
@Magisch With pride?
 
@Magisch I don't think I actually produce much work for the CMs
I do occationally abuse them with really bad puns
 
9:49 AM
Like?
 
you don't want to know :D
 
Then why do you dangle it in front of us like a tasty treat? Wicked.
 
@Gimby Cause I'm evvvillll :D
 
@Gimby Hot Dog, duh
 
Rob
@Tinkeringbell Yes, that's a rip-off - when one user engages in down-vote-worthy activity and when you do the right thing it gets reversed. Also bad is that there's some things that you can't flag for, like consistently being first to answer dupes - can't flag or downvote (excessively) the offending user. So they gain even more rep, and a following of upvoters; amounting to a reward for the behaviour. Grrrr.
 
9:57 AM
@Rob I'm not sure if you can't downvote those kinds of users... Unless they spend an hour anwering 20 dupes each day, it seems pretty obvious to me that if they answer a dupe and you vote down/close the dupe.. and three hours later they answer a dupe again and you again vote down/close the dupe... it's not aimed at the person but the behaviour.
 
Rob
You can downvote, and I think doing so is fair, but after somewhere between 12 hours and three days (and four or five posts) it gets reversed - even if it's closed as a dupe, which bumps them up another half dozen points (you getting a few back, and if it's an even number you don't know (can't determine) if it was you getting punished (reversed) or someone else getting reversed and you getting your rep returned).
 
@Rob :(
I never heard of votes that were that far in between getting reversed as 'serial' :/
 
Well if someone downvotes posts of only one other user, it can be seen as "personal hunt" even if it's given for actual bad content. Reversing it is fine.
 
I think the dupe-answering problem requires a more systemic solution then downvotes
 
@Shadow9 Yeah, I don't really agree with that though... some people just only write content worthy of no votes or downvotes :/
 
10:10 AM
@Tinkeringbell sure, but those who downvote should also do other actions.
 
It also seems weird to make that argument of 'only one other user' when we're talking about users answering duplicates on SO ;)
@Shadow9 Like?
Vote on other people too?
 
Rob
The reversal has a delay so you can't determine which was reversed, otherwise it would be easy to figure out and defeat. Once you've done something over a period of several hours (faster if you are troll down voting) then you are on a hair trigger for the next day or two where another down (or up) trips the mechanism and rolls back the last day or two - after a suitable delay.
 
@Tinkeringbell well, I assume the algorithm check for more actions, e.g. if someone downvoted John 5 times, but also upvoted Yoko in the meanwhile (all with some interval, not in same time) the downvotes won't be reversed.
But if all downvotes are to same user, with no votes for other users.... it will be reversed even if it span hours.
 
nobody here knows
in fact, not even mods know
 
@Shadow9 Sure, so then we're back at the problem where apparently these still stack up and get reversed, even though the content is worthy of downvotes...
 
10:15 AM
@Magisch Sure, that just my common sense.
@Tinkeringbell yup. In case of user doing something bad, serially, flag is the way to go, not only downvotes.
 
Rob
@Shadow9 That wouldn't be useful. Downvote John and upvote Sock - both are not reversed. Fail.
 
@Shadow9 Still.. My first example, I flagged and downvoted and it was still reversed on the posts that weren't reviewed before the reversal script ran.
 
y'all think the reversal script is a lot more sophisticated then it is
 
@Rob never said it's hard to bypass the algorithm...
 
it misses a lot
 
10:17 AM
^
 
@Magisch I know... it also hits stuff it's not supposed to be hitting, is my argument ;)
 
Rob
Flag or eventual deletion doesn't seem to undo getting reversed.
 
@Rob That's even worse...
 
@Rob they don't, reversal can't be undone.
Not even by dev.
 
@Magisch its one of those...
 
10:18 AM
Pretty sure of that.
 
"Better to have false negatives and false positives"
@Shadow9 technically....
 
Rob
Dev can just go in and set whatever to whatever. Unrestricted (except for writing up what they did).
 
@Rob sure, but they won't spend time on that. Meant "can't do with their existing tools"
 
@Tinkeringbell Maybe the fact that literally nobody but staff can see it is prohibitive to suggesting improvements ;)
 
@Magisch Yes and no? I mean, I could've written a feature request on meta way back when my votes were reversed arguing that it catches too much ;)
But I wasn't very active outside of IPS back then, maybe on Movies?
 
10:25 AM
@Tinkeringbell discussing serial voting on meta is a mistake
a lot of people will chime in and the signal <-> noise will be awful.
 
IPS Meta then ;)
 
Rob
@Shadow9 Here are two of many examples where they say that they "could do" and "have done":
https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/89352/282094
https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/173699/282094
 
tldr on what you are talking about here?
 
serial vote reversal
 
Rob
Unfair SVR
 
10:27 AM
@YaakovEllis spitballing about serial voting reversals and the automated script
it's all a bit shrouded in mystery. Also, I didn't forget you, the writeup just takes longer then I thought
 
yeah. not working on that ATM, but hopefully soon, as you know
 
I want it to be good and have examples and all that and the topic area is very complex
 
sounds good
in all likelihood I will be all in on review queues before I get to that
 
Rob
Mag is writing a tome.
 
@Magisch I am pretty sure that the mystery is intentional. If you publish the details, then people just game it, as you well know
 
10:29 AM
review queues are also areas of significant friction. I'm not writing a tome I'm trying to keep it concise and on point, to mind the fact that yaakov doesn't have time to read 10.000 words of prose from me
true
 
I bet that if we published all the stuff, it would invite more abuse, as people would try intentional to commit troll-like behavior in order to test the system
 
Rob
I meant that politely, that it was to be thorough.
 
Eh. There are LTAs who figured it out mostly and abuse that fact. But it's good that it's actually secret
deters most people from trying, even if some manage to do it
 
Rob
1 hour ago, by Rob
Much like the "Question Ban" or any fairness algorithm the Serial Voting information isn't entirely public knowledge, otherwise everyone would be able to serial vote (up or down). Comments encouraging / campaigning for voting (or reviewing) one way or another fall into the 'serial voting problem' category because those don't usually get reversed or placed on hold.
 
when the dust settles on this, I would love to get it to a place where we catch the 80% through automated scripts, and have some way to funnel these through an anonymized review queue that will allow for vote invalidation and/or escalation to mods. bottle-necking on the CMs hasn't worked in the past and will not work in the future
2
 
10:32 AM
that would be amazing
 
And then also have a "suspicious voting" flag that would put things in queue or escalate to mods/users who have enhanced tool set for dealing with it
 
I'm reasonably confident that we can find a huge swath of the incidents through some sort of automation and then feed it into the review queue with aggregated extra information and otherwise anonymized. Then mods could make reversal decisions like with redactions on a 4 eye principle
 
4 eye principles?
 
part of our internal tool set today exposes a lot of PII (like comparing the IP address blocks where connected suspected voting rings take place)
 
where two mods have to agree to confirm the redactions
 
10:34 AM
ah ok
(which used to be one of my least favourite tools :D)
 
also, if a review system with dedicated flag types is implemented and can be dealt with without staff involvement then I can finally flag everything I want without fear of snowing the CMs under :D
that would be so cool
 
lol
Only the mods :D
(though, personally quantity is rarely a bottleneck... complexity is)
 
@JourneymanGeek I could see it being for mods, or approved users like Magisch who are not mods, but who mods or CMs deem as being knowledgeable enough to be involved in decisions
But that is a long way off
 
@YaakovEllis oh in terms of snowing under
 
Rob
If everyone is voting up or down the suspected serializer should be given a 'pass' to follow suit. If it gets called a duplicate, R/A or S flagged, etc. then DVs should stand. If it gets deleted then DVs should stand an UVs fall. --- Knowing that publically wouldn't improve one's game 'as it would require everyone to agree (and abuse there is (hopefully) detected by IP; or other oddities).
 
10:42 AM
@Rob That last one is interesting, to keep DVs but remove UVs on deleted content... Right now both are 'refunded'...
I'm not sure it's really necessary to change that... perhaps just make it easier to delete stuff that's at +1 or +2 instead of requiring a negative score.
 
Rob
I am only suggesting recently deleted, if it's several days (on an active site) we probably don't really "want" to pull the UVs; because people have the right to vote incorrectly.
 
Rob
The DVs on upvoted content is another tricky one - the sheep like but the Sheppard gets the hook.
 
@Rob on most sites, probably less of an issue
we wouldn't delete stuff outside "being terrible"
and for older posts votes get locked in no?
 
Rob
True, it's left for a signpost.
 
10:53 AM
@Rob so on most sites "good content worth upvoting" + "deleted" is... rare
(well, on MSE most of what I end up deleting are lost soul questions)
 
11:07 AM
@Rob didn't the ToS / mod guidelines contain a notice that under no circumstance upvoting every Skeet posts should be seen as serial voting since that is just the natural state of things?
 
Rob
@BlueSoul such actions are invisible
 
@Rob seriously, they should just make it so that when you sign in for SO the new account is created having already voted every Skeet post by default
 
Rob
It would be unfair to BalusC whom has nearly as much rep on one site, and relatively little on a second site. Perhaps no one has heard of them, and so they get no votes for fame. ... Then there was that guy (with 800K) whom had a new user question ...
 
11:23 AM
@Rob "meme" :P
let me just be silly... at least until the next drama comes.
 
@Rob he also get rep cap every day except weekend.
 
Rob
He works weekends and is able to remove the cap.
 
11:37 AM
@Rob That sounds reasonable, but a bunch of people casting identical votes could be a voting ring. I don't see how an automated system could evaluate that correctly, it's hard enough to do it manually without making mistakes.
 
Rob
@PM2Ring, reply to Yaakov:
1 hour ago, by Rob
If everyone is voting up or down the suspected serializer should be given a 'pass' to follow suit. If it gets called a duplicate, R/A or S flagged, etc. then DVs should stand. If it gets deleted then DVs should stand an UVs fall. --- Knowing that publically wouldn't improve one's game 'as it would require everyone to agree (and abuse there is (hopefully) detected by IP; or other oddities).
Keyword "oddities".
 
Ode to My Family?
> Doo doo doo do, doo doo doo do
Doo doo doo do, doo doo doo do
Doo doo doo do, doo doo doo do
Doo doo doo do, doo doo doo do
heh
 
11:53 AM
@Shadow9 While you were writing your comment, I was writing meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/393380/… :)
 
:D
 
Rob
490
A: What is serial voting and how does it affect me?

animusonWhat is voting fraud? Voting fraud is the systematic voting against correct voting rationales. Fraud most often happens with a single user continually voting (up or down) on many of your posts within a short period of time. This is not considered normal behavior and the system will not allow it....

 
@Shadow9 sings along
 
@Gimby you know the song? I was hooked to it as teenager, without really realizing what the words mean. Only after years I did realize. :/
I had two from Cranberries on my cassette: that one and Zombie
(yes, I had a playlist on tape recorder cassette ;))
feeling old
 
It was a fairly quiet weekend on Physics, but one member who generally writes excellent answers decided to answer half a dozen or so questions. I wanted to upvote them all, but I didn't, for fear of having my upvotes reversed. :(
 
12:04 PM
@PM2Ring no harm in the automated reversal, don't think it even raise a flag.
 
it does not, afaik
 
yup
It does not
 
@PM2 so go on, do vote. ;)
Your Vote Matters
:D
 
@Shadow9 Sure, but I wanted my votes to count.
 
hmm
 
12:17 PM
!!/coffee PM2's Ring
 
@Shadow9 brews a cup of Cappuccino for @PM2's
 
I suppose the opposite problem is more common: FGITW answerers whose answers often contain errors or misleading information. If they post half a dozen or so crummy answers a day, you can't downvote all their rubbish.
@Shadow9 Thanks. :)
 
@PM2Ring no no, it's for your Ring.
;)
 
:D
 
@PM2Ring pretty sure you can, if it's mixed with other downvotes
 
12:25 PM
@Shadow9 That's kinda it though... We're supposed to moderate 'content' but one way to identify problematic 'content' is through the 'users' that write it... And we're supposedly not supposed to do that? :/ I never really got that philosophy.
 
BTW... @Mithical @Yaakov I have a weird and quick question. When did you last see a 200 NIS bill? For several months now, when I draw money from כספומט I never get such a bill (I draw more than 200), and always used to get it in the past. So, wonder if it's local to my area, or not?
 
@Shadow9 in my pocket this morning
 
@YaakovEllis where did you get it from? :)
 
@Shadow9 *shrugs in having no money*
 
200 NIS in the pocket? Not a good idea... but that's a different matter.... ;)
 
12:26 PM
@Shadow9 I love the Cranberries I am not ashamed to admit.
 
@Mithical buh... you no help. :D
@Gimby me2
 
was given to me two weeks ago, but felt fresh out of the bank. and it is in my wallet, which is in my pocket
 
R.E.M, Radiohead, and Cranberries... I wasn't that special as teenager. :D
 
My colleagues used to tease me with that. They'd creep up on me and start to sing. "what's in your heeeeeeeeeeeead"
 
@Gimby They had to ask?
 
12:28 PM
@Gimby hey that's not nice. Did you flag them? ;)
 
@Shadow9 Hey, they were the ones singing the song so ultimately the joke was on them.
 
I never listened in public so nobody really knew.
@Gimby lol
 
@Shadow9 seems like the opposite of a problem
 
@Tinkeringbell not sure what you mean? I meant that one should downvote (or upvote) more posts, made by others (Not randomly), in addition to those bad posts from the single bad user.
 
here if you withdraw 100€ the atm will give you a 100€
most businesses cannot give change and do not take 100€s
 
12:32 PM
@Magisch sure, here too. But still, it's odd.
My guess is that it was removed due to massive fraud, but can't really know. Nothing in media, or Google.
@YaakovEllis oh, so that's good. I also try to always have 200-300 NIS in the wallet, "just in case".
All parrots are together now, lovely. :D
 
@Shadow9 I once had a 10000 dollar bill 😂
 
??
 
Largest denomination bill in the world 😂
 
there is 100000 too
 
isn't there a 200 billion bill somewhere?
 
12:38 PM
@Magisch not dollars
 
That a legitimate legal tender?
 
@Magisch was, until 1960 or so
From quick glance, looks like USA ditched all >100 bills at some point.
But anyway, largest amount of cash I held in my hand was 20000 NIS (around $6K) when buying a car.... years ago.
And that felt good. :P
 
There was a $100 trillion banknote issued in Zimbabwe. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zimbabwean_dollar
 
heh
 
I meant that that's kinda silly. We're supposed to moderate content and one way to do that is through someone's user profile, sort by newest. Especially if they're on a crap content writing spree.

Having to look for something else to vote on just so you won't be 'serial voting' is kind of disruptive.
I never really got why we're discouraged from using 'newest posts by a particular user' as a way to moderate content.
 
12:43 PM
@Tinkeringbell iirc unless you're blue you're not supposed to go investigating specific users
 
Our highest denomination note in Australia is $100, but ATMs only give $20 & $50.
 
@Magisch True but... if a name pops up on the active page 3 times in short succession... it's kinda useful to see if there's more.
 
It's very much the case that users focus on content issues and don't focus on user conduct issues, those are for moderators to deal with
Yeah but the way to check for more is to flag it and let a mod deal with it
 
Blegh.
 
heh, you tell me
 
12:44 PM
That's kinda crappy if you can deal with it yourself perfectly fine by just flagging/downvoting...
I don't want 10 flags telling me to 'look into that user, they may have done more wrong' if people can just see the content themselves!
 
serial flagging isn't a thing afaik, so you can indeed just flag 10x naa
or something like that
 
Yeah but for NAA to be deleted, adding a downvote is kinda necessary. Everything gets upvotes these days so ...
 
on IPS everything does, i've noticed
same-ish on twp, honestly
 
Meta is just as bad ;)
@Magisch I'm kinda afraid IPS quality control will slowly deteriorate with all that has been going on lately.
We'll see.
 
@Magisch exactly. As ordinary user you can also flag one, and a mod can suspend with "Low quality contributions" reason.
@PM2Ring yeah, here the notes are 200, 100, 50, and 20 - ATM gives only 100 and 50. Used to give 200 a lot, until a while ago.
(never gave 20)
 

« first day (3463 days earlier)      last day (1551 days later) »