@SPArcheon-onstrike Would not surprise me if they actually intend to never respond to that, because there will be no consequences if they simply ignore it. You threaten with legal implications, but none of those actually apply to SE, because the legal system by itself won’t take action, and pursuing it takes more resources than any user here is willing to contribute.
In effect, SE can fully safely simply ignore all these requests for clarification, etc. There is no policing to ensure the law is followed, only the helpless concerned citizen preaching the law is broken.
@JourneymanGeek It does not require a community manager to interact with the community on these matters of legal subjects. I am not sure if they employ lawyers themselves, or if they buy services from a firm, but if they do employ people with legal education (and the appropriate title), these people could answer questions on MSE directly.
@JourneymanGeek I’ll believe them when I see them do it. Same with all those threats or mentions of moderators resigning. Did I mention my thoughts on last year’s strike? People were way too motivated to quit striking.
@JourneymanGeek Try shooting ice balls at them.
@JourneymanGeek Sure, I’ll agree a lot of what’s happening at SE is due to incompetence. Sure, management seems to be acting as headless chicken running around, at times. They still have some clear goals. Just because they’re not masterminds, does not mean they don’t have evil goals, bad intentions, or are acting in bad faith.
Doing the wrong thing isn’t that hard to do if you’re comfortable doing it.
@SPArcheon-onstrike Yes and no. Where your knowledge ends, and your assumption starts, there is usually a smooth transition. An assumption isn’t wrong, not founded in reality, or a thought not reasonable, just because you are unable to confirm or disprove it yet.
@JourneymanGeek But they do, unless you consider a multitude of obvious signs untrustworthy, and the testaments of former staff as false.
@Feeds You’re interrupting. Go away.