@GeorgeStocker This whole thing is a mess, and the frustrating thing is that SE Inc doesn't seem to have any intention of actually mending the existing bridge and are trying to build something new over the lake of fire. Yet are baffled why it's not working.
if you're convinced you're doing the right thing and the only people opposing you are undesirables, but you can't say that obviously, how would you act?
@Trasiva It's kinda hard mending the bridges if other people keep destroying stuff. So if everyone could leave the bridge alone and perhaps donate some building materials...
Right now, there's a bit of an surplus of heave duty demolition tools.
@mag Running around like a headless chicken and acting on gut feeling worked for me once XD But there's stuff happening. While maybe no one knows how to make fire-fighting chemicals in this case, they at least seem to know how to fight a fire using sand/water...
@GeorgeStocker Meh. I gave feedback on stuff a few times and it was used, I gave feedback a few times and it wasn't. Not everything can get a response, especially if you're busy.
@GeorgeStocker they did actually explicitly address your input with something like "useful suggestions from George, we're thinking about how to include them"
@djsmiley2k-CoW Maybe, maybe not... I'm not a CM, can't see what's going on there... But I guess 'answers' are a bit easier to gather if you provide the 'question' yourself. It does remove a certain barrier.
It's that little smidgen of hope that keeps driving people forward @user58, and they keep looking and looking for reasons to prove or disprove their speculations on whether this is all worth it. We haven't yet internalized that it's something else that keeps people going, if they do.
@rene That would be a shame. I'm reminded of the Talmud which is literally just a curated Q/A with commentaries that's been going on for centuries. To even get your commentary printed there is considered quite an honor.
One is the SE sense, as in... internet comments; whereas the example you chose is more of an elucidation and going deeper into topics. Which is technically within the purview of SE comments but in practice... that's not what's happening.
I don't actually, I had tutors for when I did the whole Bar/Bat Mitzvah thing, and they only teach you the prayers not how to really read it or pronounce it.
Sorry to drop in like that, but could anyone with the "see deleted answer" privilege can tell me why "Pizza lord" is thanking me here? It has bugging me all day and I absolutely can't remember what was their answer and what was my comment ^^'
@BelovedFool An edit is made to the post, a new answer is posted etc. that pushes the post to the front of SE's realtime tab at SE.com, and Smokey scans it whole, and reports any problems no matter how old. In this case, there has been a new answer 10 minutes ago.
Posts have been reported for human eyes that have been years old.
@mag I think Smokey takes offense, you sack of chemicals.
@Gwideon it does take a lot of CPU if it is on an under powered box so I suspect there is a bottleneck somewhere. But I'm not a Python dev so no clue where to start.
@rene If the gauche conformation is the best position for ring inversion to happen, then SN2 substitution in these particular cases is worth studying. But I'm not a chemist so no clue.
Asked and answered already. They can unsuspend themselves, so a CM would need to remove the diamond for it to be effective. Also there's a duration limit, whether that constitutes "a long time" is a matter of opinion (and irrelevant).
@Trasiva I know that a mod can unilaterally suspend himself and also remove the suspension while being suspended since I've seen it happen. No idea about suspending other mods. Saw it on July 2017.
