@JourneymanGeek well. I mean I was able to execute arbitrary code as root (in firebase). But later I realised that firebase uses Google Cloud and G Cloud uses docker container. So it's common.
@Mithrandir well in the army we had the most disgusting stuff I've ever knew/saw/used.... called גריז. I don't get disgusted easily as you probably know but man.... I couldn't touch that awful thing! lol
We always store kerosene. Hornets are quite regular here and kerosene is really helpful to destory hornets
The govt gave half a litre kerosene each month to every house as a part of ration. It started decades ago when most of the houses are non-electrified but they still continue providing it
NAA handling used to be nearly instant, with usually next to nothing in the VLQ review queue. Mod flags took a few hours, and I probably haven't had a pending mod flag last days in a really long time. That has started happening again. It might be a combination of missing motivation, fewer mods, and a higher workload on meta, but it's still noticeable.
Along with that, there's also been an increase in rants on meta (at least the past week - that might continue, but it could also not) and meta conflicts.
Shog replied to the 3 CV experiment post when the results weren't out and someone asked. That's one of the reasons I still have some hope - not everyone ignores stuff.
So - one underlying issue is,well the need to find a profit center. Which lead to both that focus on careers over Q&A. Ads worked before and is easy - but having your own ads team is a lot more difficult than leveraging an external org
no one 'really' gets it, even sites that are "social"
look at facebook - and their attempts at getting a body to decide on whether content is acceptable, after moving it off to basically a sweatshop for ages
@M.A.R. if my longwindedness bothers you I can stop ;p
I have my own FB rant to make, but wasn't it initially designed to be a pickup platform? That's what I remember from the little sh!t that I gave about it
Just before experiment was over CV queue was under 4K, sometimes even under 3K. Reopen queue was not overwhelmed. Now two week after experiment ended CV queue is back on 7K or more. I don't need any other numbers to say experiment was successful. 3 close votes are better than 5. — Dalija Prasnikar3 mins ago
Indeed, what other statistics could be used to decide whether the experiment was a success.
most questions that will be closed get closed soon after the first vote. Those that don't... mostly sit around while the votes age away.
(the graph shows the "effectiveness" of the first vote or flag - whether or not it gets closed or reviewed as "Leave Open")
In the two weeks prior to the experiment, 37% of first close votes/flags were handled. In the 2nd and 3rd weeks of the experiment, 53% of first close votes/flags were handled.
@Shog9 How would the data look like if close reviews only required two "Leave Open" reviews to dismiss from the queue, instead of three? (Assume a question wouldn't have been closed if the review task received the Close review corresponding to the final close vote after it had already received two Leave Open-s.)
In the past, weighted close votes (based on tag score/badges) were shot down because it'd be confusing to see questions closed by n users with variable n. But during the experiment, there were 3-, 4-, 5- user closures all the time, and nothing exploded.
"add" mistyped as "ad" by an MSE moderator. In time where ads are becoming more aggressive than we were promised they would ever be. Mere coincidence? I think not!