On desktop, this modification does not help in terms of readability, usability or accessibility.
First, it strays from a basic web readability principle:
Multiple chunks of information presented as list items (like the page stats were in the sidebar) are easier to read, scan and digest than whe...
Huh, so those changes actually violate web readability principles.
Then it wouldn't make blunders like this when making changes.
This change was obviously not done by a professional who is aware of standard web readability practices, even if they do deal with other UX aspects or other changes.
I mean, if a company had a policy to install Firefox on their computers as root, even if they had a security guy on their payroll, it'd be obvious that he was not consulted for that.
@Aibobot Well, it violates basic web principles, known psychological and perceptual phenomena, and appears to be an unpopular change at that. There may have been consideration, but no professional web designer was consulted (or at least, that's how it appears).
sigh you keep reading into something that isn't there. I haven't insulted anyone. Just because someone who does something is not a professional in that something does not mean that they are not good at their jobs. What I am pointing out here I believe is an oversight, not incompetence.
So, here's the problem: those who don't like the changes will complain give feedback, but those who like the changes won't probably comment anything at all.
Anyway I stated my opinion and referenced the opinions of others (including people citing web design principles). There isn't much more that will come out of this. Let's drop it for now.
@JourneymanGeek Yeah but some of the comments there could definitely have been nicer. And I can see a lot of downvotes too from before the edits, which is indeed kinda... I understand.
I'm glad to see most people did try to help though :)
I believe on community and MOD . I don't against them. If my question is so bad / off topic , delete that but but ...... after edit ...... I am not native English spicker don't mean i get DV :( I know how meta vote works but :(
Hey @JourneymanGeek ... you're terrible! There, a bit of balance. We can't go and call people legends all willy-nilly. Before you know it, it goes to their head.
I've seen a video clip on VH1 a while ago, loved it and planned to download the song/clip, forgot about it, and now can't find it again.
The video showed party on a beach, and what I remember most is a very large guy, think with a ponytail, and wearing pink glasses. He was not part of the band a...
Recently, it was announced that the "Hot on Meta" questions would no longer show up on the SO sidebar. Sara Chipps elaborated a drop on why:
Stack Overflow Employees have panic attacks and nightmares when they know they will need to post something to Meta. They are real human beings that are ...
@Mithrandir Meh. The things about IPS were a bit different: It wasn't only the Tweet. Sure, that started the process of looking at IPS, but we did have a lot of meta activity saying HNQ was the bane of our existence, and they took that into account too. Also, I did know IPS was out of HNQ when you posted the tweet in chat, but it was told to us in a private moderator room and I had asked if I could share it but not gotten any answers yet. There was communication ;)
@Magisch Fires to put out ... sure, putting out fires may take time away from the moderate interactions... but there's something in the metaphor of putting out the fire that's nice: If you create a fire, all that happens is you're going to be put out.
option 2 is to accept the relationship will be based on mutual distrust and disrespect into the foreseeable future and decide whether you want to stay here with that information in mind.
me neither, but I'm more of a realist then an optimist
and harboring false hope hurts more in the end
It's a bit like playing a game by EA or activision. You know you will never like the company and neither will any part of the community in that game, but the game might still be fun
@Stormblessed Would be nicer if you indicated that at first, so people wouldn't be confused about why you're asking to destroy the account. For example:
@Stormblessed Other users in this room can't see everything.
For example, someone assumed that you're asking to destroy the account simply for the username.
Also, destroying the account here may not necessarily be the right action to take in all cases: in a few cases, mods here may need to refer it to a CM for reasons.
@Sonic your edits here unnecessarily changed the style and tone of the post. It was perfectly fine before.
And, in fact, it introduced new typos and was generally not a necessary edit at all.
What even is the point of changing "instead if" to "rather than"? Or moving a sentence to be part of another when it was very clearly put on its own line?
@Mithrandir Ah, sorry, I didn't see the line break, since it's hard to see in-paragraph line breaks in the rendered output. I thought those were unnecessary whitespace and removed it.
In my opinion, however, very long paragraphs are difficult to read.