@Moshe Right. Not technically out. But I'm sorry to say that you're unlikely to beat the users with 100+ votes when you're currently negative.
That's partly why I was working on this script:
node_list = document.getElementById("mainbar").childNodes[11].childNodes[1].childNodes;
table_element = document.getElementById("mainbar").childNodes[11];
for( var i=0; i < node_list.length; i = i + 2) {
if (parseInt(node_list[i].childNodes[1].childNodes[1].childNodes[1].childNodes[5].innerText) < 50){
/* Something about table_element.deleteRow(i) here...? */
}
}
to remove low-voted candidates from the list. My terrible javascript skills failed me, though.
Also, that's probably ugly as sin to someone who knows Javascript.
Sorry for that. But, if someone wants to work on it more, ping me with the update.
hmm that new profile manages to waste loads of screen (16:9) if I maximize the browser, but have horizontal scroll bars if I have two windows tiled next to each other on one screen
@jin The columns on a widescreen monitor using a larger resolution than 1024/768 seem to be wasting space. But most monitors aren't double that, so when halved it looks to wide.
It seems to me that "convert" is an ImageMagick component, but most questions tagged convert (1,945 questions) deal with various conversions of various formats into other formats.
Shouldn't the noun conversion (2,926 questions) be used for such questions (even if IMO it does not categorize a que...
@awe I disagree with that assertion - you can have quite a lot of things about types (as in data types) which are entirely language agnostic (strong vs weak typing, "primitive" types, float/int/decimal/fraction inheritance and typing)
@awoodland OK. What is your opinion on the [convert] and [conversion] tags that was discussed in the referenced question? I feel that conversion is a valid tag that will make sense in combination with other tags.
@awoodland I don't quite understand what you're asking. the new user page is designed for minimal of 1024px wide, like the rest of the site, since the day SO launched. if you run 2 windows side by side on a 1920px wide resolution, each window would be less than 960px. in your post you asked for the site design to basically fill in whatever res your browser window is, which is something we don't do.
@Jin - so flowing the layout is status wont-fix, that seems reasonable. The thing that bugged me I think is that on most of the site I hardly noticed that there was even a horizontal scroll bar when placing windows like that. The only content I lose on the main site is adverts and related questions, which I don't pay much attention to usually anyway. On the new profile though it looks like it's packed so densely you lose actual buttons/content off the right hand side.
@awoodland - the status is [status-bydesign] and [status-isn't-broken] IMO, designing for 1024px is hard enough, asking any site with a large volume of content to render on a small display isn't reasonable
However, if you don't like that...click to get the mobile theme at the bottom :)
I tend to be this way on years where I have to take 6 hours to make a 2 hour drive in the first storm of the season. And then still have transport trucks sliding around trying to crush me.
I'm much better once the weather commits to being below freezing for the season, actually. It's that darned ice I hate.
I just have these annoying protective instincts; my wife can't work from home and takes my daughter to the city with her for daycare.
Heh, as someone slides through the intersection outside my window.
Though generally speaking, that's because people are fairly uniformly ignorant about how much maintenance vehicles actually need in order to operate safely.
Indeed that's how Rebecca was hired: the task responsibility and blame lists were made AWESOOOOOOOOOOOOOME! by replacing all the names with Rebecca Chernoff.
Have you wondered why we've stopped hearing about the internal wheel of blame since Rebecca got hired?
@Trufa I posted something, @Fosco and @jrg told me they couldn't see it, I reposted, Shog helpfully moved my image around, I thought I self deleted, a conversation ensued, comments were removed.
I would prefer to think of it as expression of an inner art, via the only means the robot has to adequately portray it physically, without using any other medium to share that art.
Is it possible, say, using a programming language like C or C++, to write a program that directly interacts with the power inverter or controller in a modern LCD monitor? I'm told that it used to be possible to forcefully overclock the oscillator in a CRT to make it catch on fire. I'm curious if ...
The question title font has changed. It is no longer Trebuchet MS but is now Helvetica. Is this normal, or is there a problem?
