But how you target it at badge holders and get them to actually review would be more complicated... right now, the LQP queue goes into one huge bucket. This would require creating logic to divide it up between the users who actually have a badge in something... but I think SO has that to a degree... you can choose to do close votes in a specific tag... or is that something SOBotics did...
Most of the time, downvotes are the correct response. Many NAA flags are cast on answers that are technically incorrect but are still attempts to answer the question.
yeah, I wonder why ppl flag then, escpecially if a low rep user flag because he can't DV, how can he know it's a VLQ? (I don't talk spam or other flag)
@yagmoth555 it was safe until I later got flag banned during the great close vote burndown because I had more than the allotted number of flags declined although they were ancient
@JourneymanGeek If I answered more I'd have more rep, but I usually just defer unless I have the answer plainly and it doesn't require research. SO is so downvote happy that even good answers can get downvoted because people disagree with them even if you have experts commenting it's the right answer.
That's the standard tenkeyless Num Lock key layout found on many PCs.
Turn off Num Lock - on my Lenovo, it's Fn + F10, but the combination may vary by manufacturer.
@πάνταῥεῖ Ah... Yeah I can't comment without getting political on that. Even if my comment is based in reality. Because at the moment, the definition of reality is political.
@πάνταῥεῖ aye, when some players don't care about winning, they only care about destroying the board entirely without anyone noticing it's going to go really bad.
@YvetteColomb Please note that SE employees don't generally respond to bounties. For better ways to get attention for requests that require their attention, I suggest looking at meta.stackexchange.com/questions/306397/…
@JourneymanGeek In my answer to that, I quoted an SE employee who said that it's better to contact SE rather than put a bounty if one wants official attention: meta.stackexchange.com/a/300825/377214
> In any event, you're welcome to leave a bounty for any reason that you wish - just know that it isn't mandatory in order to make sure we see something that might have fallen through the cracks.
which is kinda... also the thing here
also > Get more feedback from the community on a particular discussion or feature-request,
And do note that my answer previously contained a suggestion to ping an employee in chat, which I removed after much discussion from the community, but I still stand by because it works.
@Rachel In most cases, pinging one of us in the Tavern is probably a bit more productive than spending rep that's probably going to go nowhere. :) But we'll try. It's an imperfect system either way. — Adam Lear ♦May 19 '13 at 2:20
Once upon a time there was a user named Curiosity.
That user got fair share of questions with what appears to be fair upvotes:
Examples: one, two, three
Then came this question where a user posted a comment that might have offended our Curious user:
Good chances that he/she chose ...
I did a search for A$, but a whole bunch of results containing "Å", "A's" and "as" were return, could not find one containing "A$":
https://chat.stackoverflow.com/search?q=A%24&page=1&pagesize=50&sort=newest
Same thing for other special characters such as "#".
If they're looking at the question in a list, they should be able to right click, save URL, paste in the bar, add the no redirect and then hit enter...