I guess StackEgg was going to tell me something, but I am having a hard time understanding what exactly. Probably the font chosen is a bit too small to recognise what it was going to say or I have a really poor eyesight.
Either way, may I know what it's saying?
Actually, the SE staff anticipated you asking this question. The answer is an answer for this Meta question, and it tells the OP to waste their time somewhere else. — Alexis King48 secs ago
;)
user259867
Stack Exchange should have a banner somewhere: GARCINIA-FREE ZONE
user259867
11:31 PM
Unless Gardening decides to discuss growing that plant.
> If you think Stackoverflow has lost its way, you need to listen to latest podcast starting thirty minutes in (skip @JayHanlon parts at beg) -- Michael Pryor at 9:51 AM - 31 Mar 2015 via Twitter
user259867
11:42 PM
Yes... that will remove any doubt.
user259867
Hasn't someone proposed that reputation should age away?
user259867
So that someone who doesn't do anything to earn new rep, gradually loses privileges?
@Woodface If hadn't gotten myself hired, I would have reached 10k privileges several years after I stopped being active on SO. It's a bit strange, but it's more or less by design:
Overall reputation scores are headed nowhere but up. Pretty soon there will be thousands of mods. What to do? Thoughts on possibilities:
Thousands of mods is fine. Carry on.
Adjust the threshold values for high-level SO privileges.
Do a straight-up inflation adjustment. You had x rep, then...