Theoretically, Refresh alone should be enough. However, it has known issues when elements of child collections have been deleted.
Evict followed by Get usually gets things done.
Refresh after Evict probably won't work.
Theoretically, Refresh alone should be enough. However, it has known issues when elements of child collections have been deleted.
Evict followed by Get usually gets things done.
@TimStone I feel antsy when I have more than 4 or 5 tabs open. If it gets over 10 I usually have to stop and decide what I actually want to be doing, and close everything else.
I'm sure a psychologist would find it all fascinating and stuff.
I think it's because I'm the sort of person who would rather have his weekend interrupted by an interesting problem.
In which case I should probably emulate "House" and start breaking into users' homes in order to determine what their real requirements are, because of my cynical belief they're all lying about them.
Besides the guy above who mentioned using keywords that also are in URL, takes lead.
He then makes a distinction between the title and the name and path of the page. The URL "is" the path, the Title is the name of the page.
So 1 is URL
2 is title
3 is H1 tag which should be IDENTICAL to title....
That answer is generated using Markov chains. It's a common technique used by spam accounts, to build the illusion that there is an actual person behind the account.
Yet the review queue monkeys deemed it valuable enough to upvote it twice.
/me bangs his head on the table a couple of times.
Okay, rant over, I feel a little better now, thanks.
Yeah, a spam flag could get declined... in part because it's not spam in the "this answer is promoting irrelevant stuff" sense.
I'm not entirely convinced this entire answer is devoid of meaning. It reads like a long-winded explanation from someone with a slight language barrier to me.
(Also, if this was intended to be a spam account, they're doing it wrong. It wasn't seen again since June 2011.)
The grammar in the rest of the answer is fine too. The whole thing just reads awkwardly, like someone can't hold a coherent thought together. Which, to be honest, isn't at all uncommon.
On the whole the post is way too coherent to be fully automatically generated.
If I'm wrong... I guess I welcome our new robot overlords. :)
@AnnaLear That's what Markov-chain generated text does; look like real text. You take a corpus of input text (say, a load of SO posts), classify the words (nouns, adjectives, verbs, etc). then rescramble while keeping sentence structure intact. Voila, nonsense answers that are not quite gibberish but certainly close. There is no meaning in any such posts, so they certainly are not answers.
Both of the questions he answered are fairly bad, just close and delete them and don't worry about the content of his answer if you want to take the easy way out. :P
@MartijnPieters I disagree. Either I'm reading the answers completely wrong (which I suppose is possible), or there is some meaning there. It's not just scrambled nonsense.
How To Inter-Link Your Pages.
Onpage seo optimization -- Inner link Silos.
You call it Interlinking, sometimes they say Internal Links, sometimes "on-page link silos"
But we are I believe relating to the same thing. The answer before this one, came from an experienced person with SEO with one e...
@MartijnPieters He's running down the bits of html he thinks are most important to stuff keywords in (which is ostensibly what the question asks for). The italicized bit seems to be a bit of an appeal to authority and/or scatterbrained joke of some sort.
You'll notice it has the same effect on you. You feel as is some non-native speaker is trying to say something, but you never can quite figure out what it is they are saying.