when i want to run my xhtml file, firefox browser is running inside Tomcat.
what shall i do? please help me. before this page, it worked well. but now firefox browser running inside the eclipse. i don't know what i should do.
personel.xhtml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DO...
recently, i had the same problem. Here is the link with the solution that worked on my laptop
http://algodecodigo.blogspot.mx/2012/07/problema-al-cambiar-brillo-en-pantalla.html
best regards :)
A mod declined my NAA flag on this answer saying that the user might come back and edit into the answer a translated excerpt of the linked blog as per his comment.
This is nothing new. I called MS for support once on some very obscure issue, and while they were researching they sent me an email with "some things to try."
While I was reading it, I was thinking, "damn, this is familiar." The tech had copied one of my blog posts detailing my issue and what ...
I've had a few NAA flags on link only answers declined with "flags should not be used to indicate technical errors" on smaller sites. I have no idea if the one I'm thinking of was technically correct or not, I didn't even read the link.
In the recent question Where can I ask a question about advice for my job?, the OP asks where the following question would be appropriate:
What would be the best way to approach someone that works for me about bad odor?
CHAOS team member Abby Miller responded by suggesting the proposal The ...
Spamming an answer across a bunch of questions tends to not work well. In this case, the question was already solved, and based on the ask date the user was on Chrome 3, so he probably wasn't experiencing a bug from Chrome 18 — Michael Mrozek3 mins ago
Well... you guys are obviously right, but he also has a point. If the Chrome 3 and Chrome 18 bugs have the same symptoms, someone with the 18 bug could very well search Meta and end up at the 3 question.
@PopularDemand Sure, but it's only the superficial symptoms that are the same.
The actual cause isn't, and since Chrome most likely fixed the original problem a long time ago these bug reports aren't useful, especially to the original OP
@TimYiJiang Someone suggested taking over one of the existing Chrome 3 questions and making it generic. Mrozek, I think. (Something like that is what I was thinking of when I made my previous statement.)
This is the bug which weren't fixed yet, because people like you all care about points, duplicates and what's most important, don't care about the right answers, only the voting system. In my opinion, it should be allowed only to down-vote by original author. — kenorb5 mins ago
As an aside, I'm actually confused how people end up with that flag enabled in the first place. I thought perhaps it was enabled by default, but that doesn't seem to be the case on any of my Chrome instances.
The system is a meanie and won't let me edit a sufficient number of my digest answers to incorporate the responses of a later-comer to the Electronics Town Hall. Any chance you and your super powers would be free to copy+paste a few things for me if necessary?
@AnnaLear Awesome, thank you so much! At the bottom of this document, under "New Answers", are the four things it won't let me edit in with the links to the relevant answers above them. Should just be able to paste them in and everything'll be good.
@mootinator I recently read an answer by a mod (Robert Harvey, perhaps?) that said including things like "-1" or "+1" in comments is just noise, and thus discouraged.
But I agree; if you're going to explain your downvote, just explain what's wrong with the answer / question. No need to bring up the voting.
@Flexo That's true. Even worse are the comments that say "I'm not the downvoter, but...[explanation]" (although I think I may have done that before).
Or "[answer bashing]...PS: I did not downvote"
Anonymous
@Flexo I'm glad it wasn't locked. I think the answers were useful feedback, and blog comments do not seem cary the same weight. It's an unusual post, but I'll probably vote to reopen.
@jadarnel27 I've done that one sometimes to try and be nice to people who clearly don't understand the downvote, but more often than not they end up getting angry at you
This is from my Flagging Summary:
[Me:] Where did my comment go? It was a factual explanation for the -1, and I did keep it strictly neutral in tone. – 7 hours ago
[Mod:] declined - Comments regarding upvotes/downvotes/acceptance rate are noise on the Stack Exchange network and are re...
@Flexo Todo: Replace all my Stack Overflow answers with hand-written copies of the text, uploaded as images.
@TimStone Huh. So it's correct that the editor preview behaves differently than the full-on markdown renderer? (I'm probably using the wrong words for all of this)
Well, the preview can't do any better than it does because JavaScript's regular expressions don't support the functionality necessary to allow arbitrary nested brackets.
I have barely thought it once, so you're ahead of me. I didn't think about the fact that the client side preview might be unavoidably limited compared to the server-side parser.
It might be that MarkdownSharp should be using the nested brackets pattern within the imageRef regex, but that may cause it's own problem...let's see if that would fix it.
The Markdown parsers evaluate images before links, and ![][] style images before ![](), so because by the rules of Markdown everything on the first two revisions is actually on the first line, the server sees ![Install dconf-tools](http://hostmar.co/software-small)] ... ![enter image description here][2] and takes the most restrictive match for ![text][ref], where text is everything between the ![ and ][2].
The same thing should happen on the client though, so hmm...
@TimStone So based on that explanation, the final rendered version was more correct (since the way he embedded things all on one line was unsupported, more or less). But you're thinking that the preview should be doing the same thing.
Well, I think the server-side can be changed to accommodate this, because I think links handle this situation correctly already, but I'm not positive without testing.
> I'm looking for a good editor for both HTML and CSS. I currently use the Firebug Firefox extension, and this is a great tool, but I'm looking for something I can use without necessarily firing up a browser. Ideally it would have a live preview of what I'm coding.
If it gives you a live preview of your HTML and CSS... isn't it a browser?
RegexOptions.Singlelinecauses. to match \n, not...the opposite, or whatever I thought was going on. So MarkdownSharp ignores the fact that there's a newline after the <p>, whereas JavaScript doesn't have such an option (so the . doesn't match the newline, and the problem doesn't come up because there's subsequently no ![][] match)
Well, I can't figure out how to edit this, maybe one of you will want to take a crack at it. But I'm glad I asked, if only because I got to hear balpha opine on Facebook.
I'm looking for a good editor for both HTML and CSS. I currently use the Firebug Firefox extension, and this is a great tool, but I'm looking for something I can use without necessarily firing up a browser. Ideally it would have a live preview of what I'm coding.
Edit: As a student, I have acces...
Oh wow, look at the time...if Grace comes around asking about the digest, it was totally one of your faults. I'll get on that (and putting food in the oven) now...
A later comment indicates that there is actually an image there that just didn't load for me -- probably blocked by my corporate filter -- but I suspect this way is funnier anyhow.
"Want a better job? We can help you in under 20 days" "I in this business of 15 years. Believe to very many people our help has changed a life to the best."
Oh, well let me call that number to order a degree...
WHERE Replace(Body, CHAR(10), '') LIKE '<p><img src="%" alt="%"></p>' - That where clause catches all that posts consist of only an image. Unfortunately, it also catches posts that begin and end with an image =/
Lizzie Andrew Borden (July 19, 1860 – June 1, 1927) was a woman in New England who was tried for killing her father and stepmother with an axe on August 4, 1892, in Fall River, Massachusetts. The murders, subsequent trial, and ensuing trial by media became a cause célèbre. Although Lizzie Borden was acquitted, no one else was ever arrested or tried and she has remained a notorious figure in American folklore. Dispute over the identity of the killer or killers continues to this day.
Background
Borden's father, Andrew Jackson Borden, had married Sarah Anthony Morse in 1845; their children...