« first day (728 days earlier)      last day (4280 days later) » 

1:27 AM
@Shog9: Do you know if Area51 is ever going to get the "show removed posts" option in its reputation history?
 
 
2 hours later…
3:08 AM
@animuson I wouldn't hold your breath
 
goes on a hunger strike.
(This will last a few weeks longer)
 
<-- is full of ousmuggles
 
3:23 AM
Google thinks I just meant smuggles, for which its dictionary definition is about cocaine.
That somehow also reminds me of this photo a friend posted on Facebook yesterday:
 
4:08 AM
@TimStone Yes, it's an un-googleable word. Oddly enough, it did briefly have a presence a couple years back, but that seems to have evaporated.
 
is a word that is un-googleable really a word?
 
putinerie?
Is that where Russian presidents come from?
 
Oh boy, I actually facepalmed on that one.
@Shog9 or @RebeccaChernoff, uh... this could use an extra-quick burnination. >_>
 
I only punned that because my o key failed.
I was going to go somewhere else with that, but I totally forgot in the process.
 
@TimStone gone
 
4:19 AM
Fantastic.
 
 
3 hours later…
6:49 AM
I'm flying back to NY from Israel in about an hour.
 
 
2 hours later…
8:59 AM
@Moshe was the visit good?
what did you do in the end?
woah someone vandalised Evan Carroll's nomination
it's all italicy and bold for no discernible reason
 
 
3 hours later…
12:19 PM
@Flexo Weird. According to the revision history, he did that himself.
 
@jokerdino Yeah, it looks like a bit of a bug, so you should likely open a bug report.
 
i would but i don't know how to frame as one.
 
Hmm
Maybe @jadarnel27 knows how to describe the problem in a way that's more coherent than my rambling :P
 
that works. I can wait
 
12:26 PM
I did find a way to fix the problem, but I'm not sure if it's an acceptable solution.
 
adding a new line fixes the issue. but is that the way to fix the formatting?
 
Well, in this case the best thing to do was to just add a few lines, because it was consistent with what you were trying to make the post look like.
But this would have broken in the general case of someone mixing the inline/reference format of images and links.
 
I am lost.. :/
And it's not your fault :p
 
It might be, I haven't had coffee yet. :P
 
@TimStone Hahaha
Basically, the server-side markdown parser ignores new lines (\n) when trying to match the image or hyperlink patterns, but the JavaScript preview does not (I think).
 
12:33 PM
Oh, that's a separate issue that allowed this bug to manifest, actually.
 
o.O
You guys seem to make sense. Just that I am on a different planet.
 
I can cause @jokerdino's bug in the preview editor too
 
@TimStone Ah, I see. So the issue really does have to do with trying to nest them all on one line like that?
 
Yep
Just that the server side parser is more lenient in what it considers to be "one line"
 
Hm so having all the mess in one line is the culprit?
 
12:35 PM
Yeah. Here's a simpler example
(under the "Broken Image" header)
The Markdown is just
![inline image](i.stack.imgur.com/uKpNO.png) [some reference link][1]

  [1]: meta.stackoverflow.com
 
Hmm
 
So the problem will happen any time you have ![]() followed by some later Markdown with [][] that's on the same "line".
 
that makes sense.
if the later is also [](), no bug aye?
 
Yep, exactly.
 
hah.
great. works just fine.
 
12:43 PM
 
Oh, I thought you were trying to get it to repeatedly ping me and I was going to come in here to say "Nice try!", but :p
 
@TimStone aww.
 
@TimStone thanks for your work on the bug. Please do file it as a bug. I lack technical prowess on this stuff o.O
 
Thank you for finding it, it was interesting to investigate! I'm sure one of us will manage to file a bug on it. balpha may have seen us rambling about it in here yesterday too, so it's possible he's aware of the issue.
If worse comes to worst I'll make @Sathya post something ;)
 
;)
I should be heading home
 
12:47 PM
I did see some ramblings about markdown links, haven't looked closely
 
He's watching us even as we speak! o_o
@Sathya I...should be looking into fixing this JPQL mess quickly I suppose.
 
@TimStone I think it is good news. Even though it is a little creepy he notices without you pinging him.
 
I still don't get why anyone would take a perfectly fine language like SQL and make it pretty much unusable.
Hahah :D
 
does he have highlight on balpha or something?
 
@TimStone :P
 
12:51 PM
I was going to suggest that there was an alarm that goes off every time I'm causing trouble, but admittedly I would have expected Rebecca to show up and break my appliances in that case.
 
don't forget that chat.meta also hosts our company-internal rooms, so I tend to look at the chat window a lot
 
I am now leaving the tavern. Ping me if needed. :-)
 
You and your logical explanations, bah!
Oh nifty, a Stack Overflow question I randomly clicked on just taught me something new.
 
There's stuff that you don't know already? Nonsense.
 
I know things?
I thought I just kept saying random stuff until people stopped listening and walked away with the misconception I knew what was going on.
 
1:01 PM
120
Q: Given an infinite number of monkeys and an infinite amount of time, would one of them write Hamlet?

JasonOf course, we've all heard the colloquialism "If a bunch of monkeys pound on a typewriter, eventually one of them will write Hamlet." I have a (not very mathematically intelligent) friend who presented it as if it were a mathematical fact. Which got me thinking... Is this really true? Of cours...

 
Hm...I'm beginning to think there's no JPQL solution to this problem. I'll just add that to my pile of Java-based rage.
 
remembers this and looks in Tim Stone's direction
 
Oh yeah.
 
I still need to finish up that other feature. And be cautious about continuing to increase the mountain of changes that need to be pulled. :P
 
1:10 PM
Haha, right. I guess no one had the time to pull the existing updates last week.
 
Think I'll finish that feature and verify the API updates are taken care of for the election site today.
Well, it's a bit of a coordination act....the changes all need to be reviewed, but since I have more changes in the pipe that complicates the issue.
I also need to go rereview that helper table feature you suggested because I think I made a classic fail that should be patched first...
 
hooray for DVCS that lets you re-write history
 
Anyway, I'll get everything to a point this week where I'll draw a line in the sand, and from there on out it will definitely not be my fault anymore ;)
 
That all sounds reasonable. I'm not complaining (much =P).
@TimStone Haha, fair enough =) Then I'll start blaming @Rebecca!
 
Exactly!
"herp derp let me use this non-synchronized collection in code that can be accessed on multiple threads, what could go wrong?"
 
1:15 PM
@jadarnel27 ok, in the next build it shall relentlessly love them. — Marc Gravell 11 mins ago
 
Hahah :P
 
@TimStone That reminds me of a joke.
 
@TimStone Granted, there's a small window where this would be an issue, but I'm still ashamed |:
@jadarnel27 You have jokes about thread safety?
 
@TimStone "I like my threads like I like my punchasynchronouslines."
Of course. I have jokes about everything. I'm hilarious.
 
:P
 
2:12 PM
Out of close votes on MSO again. This new review interface is kinda addictive.
 
Well....I think I've found the most awesome thing I'll see this month.
2
 
ZOMG
@TimStone Did you watch the YouTube video that page links to?
 
I did!
 
If I ever stopped talking, I would be speechless right now.
 
2:41 PM
I've got a question, but it might be too localised (or not) for meta.
 
@RobW what is it?
 
I've found a solution to the questions asked stackoverflow.com/q/6801577, stackoverflow.com/q/1761799, stackoverflow.com/q/10792230 (and probably many more). I was initially developing a method to launch devtool programatically (first question). Now I've found the answer, I notice that it also solves these other questions.
The thing is, the solution might have some security implications. Evil developers could use it to run code in a privileged context.
So, should I post the answer or not?
Oh, and the answer doesn't require any third-party plugins, it's made using existing built-in APIs.
 
I'd say answer it with a discussion of the security issues. Don't duplicate the answer across all the questions though.
 
Well, it's security from a user's perspective. The created extension seems harmless, but under the hood, it's possible to silently install/remove extensions from the Chrome browser.
 
do the chrome team know about that?
 
2:52 PM
I'm pretty sure that I'm the first who found this method. It's a very out-of-the-box method :p
 
might be nice to give them a heads up if it's not intentional and possibly useful in a malicious context
 
Yes, that would be nice. But then my solution won't work any more, which I'd like to avoid. It speeds up extension development, when used correctly.
(if they patched it)
 
@RobW Not wanting to be inconvenienced is not a very scrupulous reason to neglect reporting a potential security flaw =)
 
any you could always mention that you found it whilst looking for missing feature $featurename
 
Both of you are correct.
I'm looking in the issues list to see if anyone has ever made the feature request.
 
3:06 PM
my recommendation is definitely "be the good guy"
don't google pay a sizeable bounty for real security bugs too?
 
Oh, that would be neat.
 
Well, to become a real security issue, it requires 3 steps from the user: Installing the extension, visiting a chrome:-URL, and then doing one thing more.
The occurrence of 1 and 2 are pretty common. But the last step is usually only done by developers.
I'm not going to report, nor publish it, for now.
 
You, sir, are a paragon of morality.
Seriously, though. As end users / outside developers, it's certainly not our responsibility to report security issues (it's the company's responsibility to notice them, in the end). But, it's always nice when we can, as @Flexo put it, "be the good guy" =)
 
@jadarnel27 Hehe :p I think that the risk is minimal if I don't mention it. The impact is limited to what's possible through Chrome's web interface.
For attackers, tricking users into installing an extension containing a NPAPI module is more attractive.
 
3:25 PM
@RobW I'm just speaking generally, since I don't really know the security issue. I trust your expertise, you seem to know what you're talking about.
Ack. I got sloppy with my NAA flags and one got declined O.O
 
A declined flag doesn't hurt. It's a wake-up call ;)
 
B-B-But my precious, invisible-to-me flag weight!
And, for the record, this is the guy's only answer. It's link only, and links to his blog and his github without disclosing affiliation.
 
@jadarnel27 By the name, it's obvious that the Github account is his. The answer can be improved, but the example might be useful to others. So, deleting can be counter-productive.
 
3:44 PM
@RobW I realize it's obvious the GitHub is his from the URL -_-
And the question is already answered (very thoroughly) in the other answers. I don't see the point in having a marginally-spammy, link-only answer on a two month old question.
 
@jadarnel27 After clicking on the blog link, my mind has changed: It looks like an attempt to attract readers to the blog (the blog contains some lines of code, plus a link to GitHub). Have you explained the situation in the flag?
 
Heh, that's what I meant when I said I got sloppy. I only submitted a normal NAA flag, because I expected that people would notice the weirdness like I did. I should have, indeed, submitted a custom flag.
I did leave the OP a comment after my flag was declined explaining the guidelines about self promotion.
 
4:18 PM
Hmm, what to work on...
 
@TimStone shenanigans.
 
You're encouraging me to create shenanigans?
 
just don't create any I have to clean up q:
 
Of course. :P
 
I wonder how many of the 57k close votes in the SO review queue are new (<4 days old).
 
4:46 PM
Users at Limit Site Name
-------------- ---------
0              ProgrammersMeta
0              EnglishMeta
1              TeXMeta
1              TheoreticalComputerScienceMeta
0              MathematicsMeta
0              Unix and LinuxMeta
0              CookingMeta
0              AppleMeta
0              GISMeta
0              Electronics Meta
1              WordPress Meta
0              Android EnthusiastsMeta
0              PhysicsMeta
1              IT SecurityMeta
1              Drupal AnswersMeta
Hmm
I was hoping they'd all be zeros so I could claim to be the only one and say the five edit limit for per-site metas was silly on that basis :P
 
Did you make sure to exclude yourself from those numbers?
 
This is the first time it's been an issue, so the data is too old to include me.
 
Oh, gotcha. I'm pretty surprised it's that common for someone to hit that limit on a meta.
 
Ah, my query might be wrong...
 
shakes head I should've known. =P
 
4:52 PM
Users at Limit Site Name
-------------- ---------
0              ProgrammersMeta
0              EnglishMeta
0              TeXMeta
1              TheoreticalComputerScienceMeta
0              MathematicsMeta
0              Unix and LinuxMeta
0              CookingMeta
0              AppleMeta
0              GISMeta
0              Electronics Meta
0              WordPress Meta
0              Android EnthusiastsMeta
0              PhysicsMeta
1              IT SecurityMeta
1              Drupal AnswersMeta
 
@TimStone That looks better! I wonder how many of those 1's are SE employees and moderators.
 
Originally I was mistakenly getting the count of edits on own posts, instead of the count of separate own-posts edited.
 
I think if they are all Community Team members, then that still kind of proves your point.
 
That query would be a pain, heh.
 
...what are you querying?
 
4:55 PM
After my fierce battle with the rate limiter I found out that I have beef with the edit limiter too |:
 
@TimStone I was thinking you could just check the 6 or 7 specific cases manually by removing your group by and seeing the details of that query's results.
Of course, without knowing the specifics of your query, I could be making no sense at all.
 
The edit limiter makes great sense to reduce vandalism, but I was curious if it was ever even close to an issue on per-site metas.
And unfortunately the edit limiter isn't something that I can reps-away
 
query link?
 
Related, isn't it kind of annoying internally not to be able to share links to these kinds of queries, or has that not been an issue?
Err...coherency...share links to a view that would show the correct results without you having to select the right options and re-run.
 
Did you have to run that query a bunch of times, or do you have some magical way to run cross-site queries, @TimStone?
 
5:04 PM
There may be some magic involved.
 
Hmmm. Magic, eh? I'm intrigued.
 
Magic which should arguably be validated server-side, but at the time waffles wasn't concerned about that. >_>
 
Hey, you said shenanigans.
 
naughty @TimStone!
hahahaha
 
5:08 PM
Oh. This thing? How have I never seen that before?!
 
guess it pays to know the code, eh?
 
Indeed it does. ;)
@jadarnel27 Nah, that involves a lot of effort.
Although Mark Hurd made a query-producing-query for doing some form of cross-site querying.
 
@TimStone assuming we're still on the same page, yeah...there's some grumbling every once in a while. it's on the "yeah...could change that, but not a priority" list...somewhere...
 
@RebeccaChernoff Ah, gotcha. I will make a mental note...
Hmm, I also noticed there was a JavaScript error when I ran that query. |:
 
@TimStone I'm not a fan of effort. That seems suspiciously like work.
 
5:14 PM
@TimStone cool. you could also mentally note that the addition of 2 items there is also on the "could be handy" list...but I'll let you ponder what that means lol.
 
scratches head Yeah, I may need some time to decipher that one. :P
 
@TimStone that non validated thingadongdong? adding a thingadongdong to it that actually excluded a thingadongdong so that maybe using the thingadongdong wouldn't use the really big thingadongdong that would just cause queries to time out. and then if you add that thingadongdong, why not add another thingadongdong to make it a pair to go with the other pair in the thingadongdong.
>_<
 
Ah.
 
rofl, that actually helped?
 
Yeah, I follow you now.
...I think.
But I thought that it would succeed anyway in that case?
(just would take extra time unnecessarily)
 
5:25 PM
err, uhh, huh? lol
I might be all thingadongdonged out.
it'd do the really big thingadongdong first just because of the order, so if that takes forever*...
* for some value of forever that is not actually forever
 
Ah, so the issue is just that it takes extra time, not that it actually fails (except for the really big thingadongdong)
 
o_O What is going on here?
 
@TimStone well, it hits the timeout
 
Because if a thingadongdong fails while running the thingadongdong against all thingadongdongs it's supposed to move on to the next thingadongdong uninterrupted. But obviously you waste time waiting for the one thingadongdong to fail in that case which would be better to avoid if you knew it would indeed fail.
 
hmm
supposed to move on?
 
5:28 PM
That's what Sam's comment says.
 
interesting.
 
Maybe Sam's comment is thingadongwrong.
3
 
hahahaha
 
Ohhhhhhhhhhh.
Ah, yes.
If the really big thingadongdong is first then it will fail the entire string of thingadongdongs.
The exception is only swallowed for everything after that.
 
ah
the really big thingadongdong is just a whole level of thingadongdongs beyond everything else, that sometimes not including that thingadongdong is ok because it just doesn't hold with the other thingadongdongs.
 
5:31 PM
Yeah, makes perfect sense.
I'll make a note about what you're describing and also to look at whether the way that works internally makes the most sense.
 
cool.
so glad we had this thingadongdong about the thingadongdongs.
 
I'm glad we could get something thingadongdone as well.
 
I still declare @jadarnel27 the winner of the conversation though. (: That was the wrong moment for me to be taking a drink of water. >_<
 
claps and awards star
I think that earns him some bonus points.
 
takes a bow =P
@RebeccaChernoff Hopefully there was no damage =)
 
5:43 PM
the world lives on.
 
It would be an awfully funny coincidence if that water accidentally and inexplicably caused a computer error that resulted in the edit limit disappearing from per-site metas, wouldn't it?
 
Oh wow, how did it end up being 1:45 already? I should find some lunch...
 
@TimStone I don't like your odds on that one.
 
@jadarnel27 This is why I don't gamble.
Hmm.
Sometimes when I look at the Hot Questions list I see some interesting things.
Other times it just makes me sad-face. :/
 
6:41 PM
@TimStone Which question is currently making you sad-face?
 
7:03 PM
gasp Data Explorer is down!
It should totally have it's own custom offline page. And not the beta site one.
 
7:18 PM
@jadarnel27 tis back, just a bit of maintenance.
 
Ah, thank you. I can stop panicking now.
Haha, I don't remember what I was going there to check. I'm crazy as hell.
Mysterious maintenance that was not of the feature-implementing or data-updating variety. Curious.
 
Seekret maintenance.
 
7:34 PM
That's the stuff, yeah.
 
hey, are mods able to see who is flagging stuff as spam/offensive unnecessarily?
we have someone in C# chat that is flag happy - annoying every 10k+ user.
 
@KyleTrauberman According to this answer, people's flags will get muted if they repeatedly flag incorrectly.
 
interesting, didn't know that. Thanks for the link.
 
@KyleTrauberman Actually, I may have misread that. I think he was just saying that's a good idea.
 
8:33 PM
> The best data type you can use is called "Blob" since it will store whatever you want. It can be boolean, it can be an array, or it can your own custom data type.
 
...
 
Yeah. It's hard to argue with that logic.
Feature-request, eh? EH?
 
8:51 PM
I'm surprised that no one's reported the bug in your screenshot.
 
There's a bug in my screenshot? Gross.
 
Though I suppose that wouldn't have gotten broken had I not made such a mess of things at the time... sighs
 
I don't see anything out of the ordinary. What is it that I'm missing?
 
That default revisions text is horribly unstyled.
It's missing padding and a background colour.
 
Hmmm. I rarely (if ever) notice stuff like that. It doesn't look that bad to me.
 
9:02 PM
I pay extreme attention to detail, heh.
 
@TimStone bug? :p
 
It was styled at one point. :P
Aww, I broke my exactly 22k reps.
 
9:37 PM
Oh sure SQL Server, eat up all of my RAM. Not like I need that or anything.
Apparently 2,147,483,647 MB is the default maximum memory setting...good to know. Oddly enough, after checking, I found out I don't have quite that much RAM in my computer...
 
lol, you don't? lame.
 
A friend of mine just recently had her (rather obtuse, granted) husband ask "how do we teach [daughter] not to get raped"
:o
 
>_>
 
@jcolebrand I would assume you responded, "Stay away from Daniel Tosh shows"?
 
I love Daniel Tosh's comedy.
 
9:48 PM
I Facepalm Daniel Tosh.
 

« first day (728 days earlier)      last day (4280 days later) »