Nuke it Shog, if it distrupts the environment there, but I had to post it because I am, in person, extremely attached to wikipedia since my school days. That post is crap, so I left a comment:
I am an active wikipedian since years, and all I can say is you got it all wrong, about wikipedia, as well as the content ownership on SE. Protip: refrain from writing inaccurate content. — Infinite Recursion3 mins ago
Ohh yes @Sam, editor edited his post (full of typos) saying low rep users are interfering. One answerer added a puking image referring to Light's low-rep friends, one wrote crap about wikipedia's content policies.
Nothing new for that site @Sam, a few days ago, they tried to remove a mod in a meta post, that was messier. On SO, such a discussion calling out a user or mod by name in a post would never be encouraged, but that community has it's own culture.
@InfiniteRecursion I like only smokey who is always online. and when I ping then it says always "watching this endless list of new questions never gets boring". :)
I use Avira (the free version) now. It works fine, but the only annoying thing is that it shows a pop-up every day asking whether I want to upgrade to the Pro version.
I have seen such avatars used by particularly low rep users a lot
Seems like these are nerds, and they've well conceived how to attract attention from other nerds.
I don't actually know what I really want to ask about such things here. How should we handle that (out of band from the actual qu...
Many male members of this community use male pictures as avatars. Similarly, female avatars are allowed.
That being said, please reconsider how we, as the female members of the community will feel when we read such posts. A post should focus on content.
Judge posts by quality, not looks of the ...
I think we should ban ducks and blue footed boobies as avatars!!! :D — bluefeet ♦2 mins ago
@InfiniteRecursion I don't want to ban them. Pretty girls should be able to show up as pretty they can be, or everyone else should like to show up as they want! I just have that feeling that some users misuse that rights (with a sexist intention). — πάντα ῥεῖ3 mins ago
◳◰ ◓◨ ◨◧◕ ◎◌ ◱◯◱◯ ◍◌○ ◉◉ ◇◔◓◕ ◐►◓◒ ◒◑ ◈◑ ◆◆◓ ◉◉◉
Administrative details (not part of the puzzle):
The answer is a clue to The Security to the Party [12] (now with party soundtrack!) which is currently unsolved and has a bounty for the first person to solve it.
For the benefit of anyone witho...
@Bart I found their focussing on "her" <3 comment disappointing, so I too wrote a "upvoting, <3" under Shog's post as a symbolic protest, but deleted it after a while because Shog is a low rep user, and nobody likes to see him get all the attention and <3s