Now that I'm done impatiently waiting for my new phone, I can impatiently wait for my Stack Exchange Android App alpha testing invitation. Maybe I should have requested that while I was waiting for the phone...
Please install the Stack Exchange Super Awesome Extreme Data Transfer Mechanism and the program will guide you through receiving your content.
The program can be downloaded from the Stack Exchange Super Awesome Extreme Data Transfer Network, which requires the Stack Exchange Super Awesome Extreme Data Transfer Mechanism to access. Good luck!
Haha, I've got to look those up. (And they are the brewer from my region, where I used to live). But I can do you one better. This is my voice-over: youtube.com/watch?v=lys45y1iTmQ
lol, how childish that after a downvoted thread, someone went through my questions and downvoted even upvoted ones (of course without comments). I think meta is a kindergarden.
user200500
So, do you do medical research too? I vaguely remember a few of those abduction adduction terms from the PE course I got a D on, but it seems fairly involved for someone hired primarily for computer science expertise.
Ah that reminds me @LaszloPapp. I think one of those is mind and I still have to reverse it. It was a test for another Meta question about rep history errors for suspended users.
We do a lot of stuff @Asad. Really anything related to motion capture, motion tracking, 3D scanning, etc. Most of the demoed work is medical though. The other stuff is all still under an NDA unfortunately.
@LaszloPapp I think it's quite reasonable for other users to perform tests on the system occasionally, especially if it helps others. No harm has been done here.
Again, please do not make benefits for other users' inconvenience. It has been explicitly asked politely. Ask the team to set up a test account for you. If it is important, they will do the favor for you, and especially not do this for otherwise well-edited posts to be able to make a dummy edit (and bump) afterwards.
Right no apologize, just abusive use. Go ahead if this is your way then. These are the kind of actions why I will stop visiting meta as much as possible.
@LaszloPapp if this really bothers you this much, and you think I'm overstepping boundaries here, by all means flag my for moderator attention and let them have a good look. As far as apologies go, I think I already said "Sorry about that one".
I wrote to the team already. I do not think it is fair, and I think they should make it clear not to do it, especially if users ask politely. They should provide test accounts, etc, if it is really that important. I personally fail to see why it was so important, but if the team considers so, they will help, I hope.
If one examines the privileges earned above 100 reputation, they are split into two camps:
Privileges that are dangerous in the hands of someone unfamiliar with the domain.
Privileges that are simply rewards for good participation. These include:
view close votes
established user (i.e. viewin...
@Bart: scores will not make you a great person. If you cannot stop downvoting people (even if it hurts them like me) for your fun, I personally think that is a problem. Covering such behavior by scores is also improper IMO.
A lot could be said @LaszloPapp. But luckily you don't at all have a habit of misrepresenting situations, nor of slathering anything with a sauce of poor interpretation. If you've notified the team, let that be it. They'll deal with it. And I'll see what happens on my end.
I'm curious.. would it be legal for a US company to write something like "because of COPPA you must be 13 to use this site. If you admit being younger than 13 we need to delete your account in case we ever find out about it" in their terms?
Hallo my old friend!!! I'm suspended and mooching about reading pet chat and reading posts... peaceful without me hey?? How are you?? and your pug and how's the parents boxer going with the pug?? — Skippy2 mins ago
@Oded: well, it seems to me you have not read it all, the apology was meant for saying that "I might do it again". I personally hope that is not going to be done again.
I am Juliet from New York.
I am stuck in a problem, and I am no electrical engineer. Can anyone please help me with the following question?
What is the total capacitance of capacitors connected in series, C1=1214F, C2=2121F ? Result must be INTEGER (without -F-)
Yep. But we don't have differentiation between elected mods and SE employees. You would have to look at the mod tab on the users section or in the profile page (we employees say that we are)
@Bart I think they, like comm team members, can reveal non-PII information that is private. Like if a user is a sockpuppet, or the reasons behind a suspension. At least I've seen Comm doing that, not sure about the devs
Shog is probably a bot written by the dev team anyway
mod agreement explicitly doesn't apply to employees - we essentially have a more binding contract anyhow, with similar expectations (basically, "don't be an idiot, don't publish private data, etc")
Time for coffee. I just mis-clicked a suggested edit review, accepting a terrible edit on what wasn't even an answer. .... now we wait until an angry user rages about this on Meta. :)
I did receive a notification that my domain expired, though. (Good, now they'll stop sending me those insistent emails that my domain is about to expire.)
@JohannesKuhn That works incredibly well. But many are showing only one 'creator', it doesn't show who approved the synonym request like it does on a suggested edit? Does that information get lost to the void?
@JohannesKuhn Time to try to figure out SQL again. That does work as it has the ApprovedByUserID field.
Ultimate goal is to figure out how many of the recent synonyms were actually voted by community folk, and how many were unilaterally implemented by mods. A quick glance says that mods are the ones creating virtually off of them