@TimStone: "we try to make the tools great [...] we also want your input on that any time ", vs: "This feature is still experimental and under development; it's too early to have this conversation."
@ChrisF Yeah, but I think it's so up in the air at this point that they may already be going in some of the directions that people want, but the time waffles has to take to explain that on each issue might be time better spent getting it closer to completion, so they can say "Here's what we have, what should we change?"
I strongly suspect that the development cycle of features is changing significantly now that they have more valued associates, and office, and capital. It is unlikely to be as community driven as before.
As originally requested here and described in Diff is Hard, Let's Go Shopping!:
[The team is] planning to open the floodgates and allow everybody to submit content edits on posts
Am I the only one who sees this undesirable? In fact, the more I think about it the more I think it has the pos...
So it's great that our whole community is now able to provide edit suggestions, but the decision to limit one-click approval status to moderators is causing me some heartburn.
Much to my surprise, today I encountered a nearly-good edit, one that I was about to make, and rather than be able to ...
@YiJiang the selector at the top of the page. It should have a white background, not transparent. Or else the list should be in a box below that so that it doesn't scroll underneath. Either way.
Want me to give you a line of jQuery to fix it so you can see what I mean?
@YiJiang At my ex-company, we had a product called <Company> Access, but since it was online, it was really <Company> @cess. I guess I stole it from that. shrugs
Hmmm... although I do need to update the elections page to pull data from the Primaries page instead of the nomination page for the sites that have gotten into that stage
@TimStone my boss informed me that another one of our competitors has updated their site, I am reviewing their product now. I am happy to say it doesn't work worth a damn!
That's kind of how we got ourselves into the position we're in now, by pushing out something that didn't work very well at all (and cost a whole lot, to boot).
I am reposting this question since i didn't get a satisfactory answer.
1) List a = new ArrayList();
2) List b = a;
3) List c = a; // with warning of course
Why there is an unchecked warning at clause 3) while no unchecked warning at 2) ?
I don't see the difference between (Unbounded wildca...
Thank you to everyone who participated, particularly the candidates! Virtual coffee is on me!
The full transcript to the Town Hall Chat can be found here.
Despite being in timezones all over, all 7 candidates were able to attend!
Whether you were able to attend or are just reading the transcr...
I was trying to understand how their URLs work, and when I modified the URL query arguments I fgot an error page with the SQL commands that failed, LOL
@YiJiang sorry, phone call ... anyways, this is what I was referring to: $('#sort').wrap('<div>').parent().attr('style','background-color: white;height: 25px;position: fixed;left:0px;top: 0px;width: 100%;');
Go shove that into the page and scroll it up and down before and after
@drachenstern Yes, but currently the page grabs the election nomination page specifically because I was afraid that the Primaries page would be significantly different in terms of the DOM
and it's not like the entry will change at this point
So @Hello71 is asking about SU according to his activity pages off each site that I bothered to check, but you've only got from what I can tell 5 downvotes in the past 24 hours
These election nomination pages are technically posts, so I can grab the +/- votes for each of them - would it be worth it, instead of just a single combined score?
(This will of course create an additional API call)
From my elections statistics page:
I inserted in the detail field as plain text because I wasn't sure if the results would be HTML, but the $ChatUrl left in the anchor's href is surely a bug.
@YiJiang Yeah... I assume you're just submitting votes for the underlying questions, but since the score isn't displayed 'til the primaries start... and the sort order is random... it won't really matter. Apart from the rep thing, but... meh.
As originally requested here and described in Diff is Hard, Let's Go Shopping!:
[The team is] planning to open the floodgates and allow everybody to submit content edits on posts
Am I the only one who sees this undesirable? In fact, the more I think about it the more I think it has the pos...
So it's great that our whole community is now able to provide edit suggestions, but the decision to limit one-click approval status to moderators is causing me some heartburn.
Much to my surprise, today I encountered a nearly-good edit, one that I was about to make, and rather than be able to ...
I am reposting this question since i didn't get a satisfactory answer.
1) List a = new ArrayList();
2) List b = a;
3) List c = a; // with warning of course
Why there is an unchecked warning at clause 3) while no unchecked warning at 2) ?
I don't see the difference between (Unbounded wildca...
Thank you to everyone who participated, particularly the candidates! Virtual coffee is on me!
The full transcript to the Town Hall Chat can be found here.
Despite being in timezones all over, all 7 candidates were able to attend!
Whether you were able to attend or are just reading the transcr...
From my elections statistics page:
I inserted in the detail field as plain text because I wasn't sure if the results would be HTML, but the $ChatUrl left in the anchor's href is surely a bug.
