« first day (5191 days earlier)      last day (58 days later) » 

06:21
@PeterJames I don't agree with basing tag edits on which tags you've earned rep on. That would be too restrictive. Sure, you do need to have some understanding of the tag topic, and what the tag means. But you don't need to be a SME (subject matter expert).
Besides, people can be experts in tags they don't write answers for. Eg, I learned C a few decades before I learned Python. I don't think I've ever written a C answer on SO, and my C knowledge is a bit rusty these days, but I remember enough to do simple tag edits, if I want to.
OTOH, there's definitely room for improvement in the current editing system. It would be great if editors were required to demonstrate competence before they were permitted to edit. But I don't know a practical way to implement that.
Still, it amazes me that people with poor English skills feel qualified to do grammar edits. Maybe a simple quiz to earn edit privileges could remove the worst of them.
06:59
27 messages moved to Chimney
@PM2Ring in theory, the suggested edit system's supposed to take care of that
In theory. But in practice, we get robo-reviewers approving crap edits.
One hilarious example I saw in the last year involved a list of items indexed with Roman numerals. The original sentence said something like "Case I is correct". The editor changed it to "Case I am correct".
07:35
@PeterJames you're not the only one! Looks like this poor guy's heart also moved a bit, the doctor is looking for it.
:-D
@JourneymanGeek hehe. I learned the hard way years ago how broken this system is, with robo reviewers turning it into a wild wild west. Guess I could try and fight it e.g. meta posts, flags, asking mods to ban the robo's... but didn't feel like Don Quixote and still doesn't feel like that. ;)
@ShadowWizard its a better option than micromanagement
sometimes you need to accept the wisdom and folly of the crowd
@JourneymanGeek sadly in the review of suggested edits, as whole, the crowd has way more folly than wisdom.
Yeah, looked at the link
its spam
07:54
odd, spammer has account for over a year on SO, idle.
It's difficult to determine the percentage of people who are gullible enough to click on malware installers. You can't do an online survey...
I have VMs :D
I flagged a spammer the other day like that. They had a totally idle SO account for a year, then all of a sudden they created an account on a minor site & started spamming.
that's a common pattern
I've always suspected account creation's automated, and its not inconceivable they are traded.
Makes sense
08:11
actual spamming depends
there's evidence the phonePE/india-indian support spam's manual
08:29
@JourneymanGeek how? These days anything can be automated. ;)
calling for the automated coffee
@ShadowWizard :-) No doubt that was generated by an AI with the prompt "please create an image of a doctor examining a patient's heart on an exam table" and who are we to argue with AI?
hands @ShadowWizard a brown liquid that smells vaguely of sewage and used motoroil
@PeterJames actually no AI. Wikipedia! :P
> 23:26, 27 December 2012
If there was GenAI back then.... we are doomed. ;-)
@JourneymanGeek ah, that would be OPO!
in Petəíŕd's Den on The Stack Exchange Network Chat, 5 mins ago, by OakBot
Sure thing! 🎶

(Chorus)
Oak's Premium Oil, smooth as can be,
Keeps your gears moving, setting them free.
From engines to hinges, it’s the way to go,
For everything that needs a steady flow.

(Verse 1)
In the morning sun, engines hum,
With Oak's Oil, they’re second to none.
No squeaks or creaks, just silky glide,
Feel the power as you ride.

(Chorus)
Oak's Premium Oil, smooth as can be,
Keeps your gears moving, setting them free.
From engines to hinges, it’s the way to go,
For everything that needs a steady flow.
Thanks!
08:37
Making OakBot cheerful is my greatest achievement, ever. No doubt. :D
@JourneymanGeek too long, but nice to see Jon again, and what he's been up to these days. ;)
09:21
in The h Bar on The Stack Exchange Network Chat, 2 days ago, by PM 2Ring
GenAI can easily draw hands with real fingers, but it often has problems drawing hands with integer fingers. ;)
10:12
@PM2Ring haha :D
What about floating (point) fingers?
 
2 hours later…
12:36
4 messages moved to Chimney
13:04
There's a new term for LLM doing the rounds on Mastodon: Grand Theft Autocomplete
I saw that. I chuckled sensibly
 
1 hour later…
14:18
@PM2Ring you're on a roll today! :D
 
3 hours later…
17:18
@ElementsInSpace pity we can't see it now. :/
@ElementsInSpace lol nice! But how? You don't have 10k on math.SE
Do you really think I can’t travel back in time?
It was only about an hour ago.
 
1 hour later…
18:46
@PM2Ring @PM2Ring I agree, restricting tag edits to tags on which you've earned rep would be too restrictive. I was only really thinking of tag-only edits, but even in that case it would probably be too restrictive and probably even more complex to work out the rules for deciding which tags to include. And the whole point of the suggested edits feature is to enable low rep users to be able to make edit suggestions and take part in improving the site.
 
2 hours later…
21:03
@ElementsInSpace :D

« first day (5191 days earlier)      last day (58 days later) »