Eh, maybe. Discuss it with @JourneymanGeek then too, but... https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/381399/revising-the-criteria-for-moderator-nominees/381402#comment1272108_381399 ... I found that bullet a bit superfluous from the beginning, mostly distracting. If she wants to edit it out, the post becomes more focused on actual user activity and the candidate score, and I don't mind editing my answer.
She will still be mentioning the three main criteria (I think) so Geeks answer can still make sense, but if he objects then by all means roll back :)