@SonictheStay-HomeHedgehog yes, Burnaki has that. Not sure if that still runs because .. reasons.
@Catija for SEDE read-only is enough. After all that is what you gave me here as well ;) and you can, as Shog9 said, point SEDE at any SQL Server database. It will work. SEDE doesn't care what the database schema looks like. It has a few features that are bound to the names of tables but that is about it. Despite not being available by default I do feel it might be helpful to point out SEDE exists and will work for them if they support it themselves.
Okay. Yeah. A bit of a shame that none of the linked questions answers the question asked, or it must for that one hint from peterh that SEDE is the solution.
where you still have to workout your self what that one line query will be then.
@YaakovEllis well, I casted a re-open vote but it has also 2 delete votes so it will be a tight squeeze to have it survive. I did properly answer in a comment so I'm biased for having it re-opened. I let others judge. I was checking if I missed context, for example due to a ton of deleted comments from the OP (and others)
I believe the fourth is when you upload your image to the online Stamp company and there's an error serving the image, so an error message comes up; the person apparently thought that the default error image was what the person wanted made into a stamp.
It's like these NSFW T-Shirts where there's a great failing in understanding how things work.
We care about the concerns of the community, written about here and in other places, and are committed to ensuring that there are no deviations from this policy in the future. Though we had internal policies on talking to the press in place before the events that led to this question being asked,...
@JourneymanGeek Assuming they're only used on policies (which, I mean... policy locks...) I imagine there won't be. I was just referring to that being a pretty good use for it, and the first time we're seeing it truly in action beyond its introduction.