« first day (3297 days earlier)      last day (1724 days later) » 

12:03 AM
@Unihedron An even further throwback: jsfiddle.net/yijiang/AYPpF/24/embedded/result
 
 
4 hours later…
3:47 AM
The truth about all crime.
 
4:03 AM
 
4:21 AM
32
Q: foo.com is sketchy; “How to Format” and help should use HTTPS links in examples

StormblessedIn the “How to Format” bar that shows when editing the body of a question or editing an answer, there is this example for how to format: <http://foo.com> [foo](http://foo.com) <a href="http://foo.com">foo</a> There is a problem with this: foo.com is a site that is owned by someone currently an...

@JourneymanGeek could you please mark this ? Thanks
 
@Stormblessed Please use flags.
 
@Catija oh sorry
There, flagged
 
Thanks! :D
 
4:37 AM
@Stormblessed oh look at that, oneboxing question makes links links
But only the ones with no protocol at the front?
Backwards of how HTML works in my very limited experience to work only without “http”/“https”
 
Huh? Your URL starts with https:// ?
 
Oh wait it does start with http
1
A: Formatting Sandbox

Stormblessedgoogle.com https://google.com http://google.com google.com https://google.com http://google.com google.com https://google.com http://google.com (That’s a oneboxing test) Community! I am writing a bunch of words so this doesn't become a comment because that would suck. Here, look at my l...

The first one has no http or https, but the others do; it hides the http/https in the box and links those
1
A: Formatting Sandbox

Stormblessedhttps:// https://aaa http:// http://aaa aaaaa:// aaaaa://aaa aaaaa://google.com google.com https://google.com http://google.com google.com https://google.com http://google.com google.com https://google.com http://google.com (That’s a oneboxing test) Community! I am writing a bunch of ...

It doesn’t hide fake things that resemble protocols, but it does make links and hide https/http with non-URLs
There I’m done good night
 
 
1 hour later…
6:11 AM
24
Q: How do you deal with the emotions of not being the one to find the cause of a bug?

br3w5I've had a couple of occasions where I've been trying to find the root cause of a bug. These are bugs that might originate with the code or server configuration but their effect is quite broad so might involve networking and/or concurrency issues so cannot be covered solely by better tooling. I'...

I really don't get questions like this...
I mean, why would someone be upset at someone else finding a bug?
 
It is my Bug!
You're stealing it from me!
 
MY PRECIOUS!
@Stormblessed No
 
I mean it'd make sense if he worked in infosec since those bugs are more valuable.
But a random concurrency issue or something? Or a livelock?
 
So - there's a few things. status-foo retags are one of the few kinds of flags that we mods don't always handle - since we can't always tell if something has been fixed.
Also, SE isn't dumb and if you use a http link it gets redirected
 
Either you have an insanely big ego, or there's a quota of bugs you're forced to find.
 
6:20 AM
I do it on my own site so http vs https isn't important
 
@JourneymanGeek It doesn't use HSTS though.
 
I once ran on a project where we replaced the 20% budget for testing with a single bottle of wine: Who found the most bugs would get the wine. In that scenario people would get upset if you found their bug. (back story: management argued our testing budget was too high)
 
@forest it apparently does not.
I do!
 
nice
I do as well. I would also use HPKP if Google wasn't an idiot and didn't remove it...
 
@forest I also cheat and just use the mozilla setting generator thing
 
6:22 AM
I just read the nginx.conf manpage.
And then curse when I get the syntax wrong and bring down my server by mistake.
 
anyway - where was I
Oh yeah
SOme folks probably just get a sense of accomplishment from the big things?
Me? I professionally stare at screens, and a day when I need to get nothing done is a good day
 
Yeah but every single bug?
 
Maybe that's what keeps him going from the soul crushing tedium of life
 
I once spent like 6 hours trying to debug some MIPS assembly... Turns out I had a brainfart the whole time and used an argument for a syscall wrong. I spent literally hours reading the MIPS Linux syscall ABI and even reading kernel source code before I realized what was wrong.
 
It is what gets him up at night.
 
6:26 AM
I thought I was going crazy and totally misunderstood how arguments were passed on the stack in the MIPS ABI, but it turned out I was just being a completely idiot.
 
@forest ... and you still remember that ...
 
@rene Well yeah. It was the longest time I spent trying to fix the simplest bug. :P
 
@forest though
its your bug
Its personal
 
Yeah but if someone else fixed it for me... I'd have saved so many hours.
A fixed bug is a fixed bug, no matter who fixes it.
I mean unless you're never able to find any bug, in which case you shouldn't be a programmer.
 
"Aw. ye we boggart. I have cooked yer goose. Fried yer bacon. Greased your gander. You are an ex bug, no longer a pestulous pustule upon the rump of my code...."
The world is lucky I don't code. Or that I don't code with unsufficient sleep
 
6:29 AM
The world is unlucky that I sysadmin while high.
Better than doing it drunk though. I just waste time if I'm high.
I once worked with someone who wrote the most... interesting code on meth.
The comments were always a fun read.
He never used revision control either, so that was exciting.
 
(I don't drink. And I'm staying away from the mod queues until I get enough sleep)
 
I used to drink. I'm not a friendly (or productive) drunk, so I don't anymore.
Weed is far better anyway. Less damage to the liver.
 
I'll stick to good chocolate, and the occational soda...
apparently sugar's public enemy number 1 these days anyway.
 
Sugar's been public enemy number 1 since the 90s. It's "the white death".
For good reason too. It wreaks havoc on the immune system.
Sucrose, that is.
 
(also, since I work inside a government facility - even the vending machines have low sugar stuff)
eh, Artificial sweeteners typically taste terrible to me
I think the one substitute that tastes non vile is sucralose, and that stuff typically tastes too sweet
So I'll stick to partaking in moderation
 
6:38 AM
they taste artificial?
 
@rene pretty much
 
the name says it all
 
Stevia tastes kinda chemically. Some of the other ones don't taste... sweet...
IDK if my taste buds are broken or something
 
@JourneymanGeek Artificial sweeteners are toxic to dogs, that's why.
 
and I kinda like the option of getting a nice, high sugar, caffeinated beverage at 2-4 am in the morning when I just need to keep the old engine running a few more hours.
@forest like xylitol?
 
6:40 AM
mhm
 
I mean
if you want to drink diet stuff, by choice, its fine
ANNOYINGLY, we have a fresh orange juice vending machine...
and its in the canteen that's locked at night
 
ouch
 
I wouldn't mind that. I don't mind fresh OJ, and the machines are cool to watch ;p
 
Someone should make an orange juice vending machine that's genuinely 100% fresh. It would have a little orange tree inside it and plant lights to help it grow, and it'd take an orange off and juice it automatically whenever anyone wants OJ. All you'd need to do is fill it with water and fertilizer.
 
lol
this stores a bunch of oranges, and chills em
so you order a juice, it cuts and sqeezes them, dumps the juice into a plastic cup, and seals it - bubble tea style
its fun to watch ;p
 
6:44 AM
In Vegas, there's orange juice for like $10 but it only fills a quarter of a very, very small glass.
It's really delicious though.
 
6:59 AM
o_O
 
Oh it gets better. Imagine a $250 meal for one adult and one child... And it wasn't filling either.
And, of course, there's the $7 small bottles of water.
 
having worked in a casino? I can imagine.
 
It's a shame I don't drink anymore. They fill you up with alcohol for free at the big ones.
 
I seem to recall the sands here has bottles of water. Can't remember seeing booze.
Cause we don't have casinos. We have "Integrated resorts"
 
heh
Well Los Vegas is not like most other places.
It's a real trip.
Sin City fits perfectly. It's hedonism turned up to 11.
 
7:13 AM
Singapore's all "we want the money, but we really kinda don't thinl... OH MONEY!!!!"
 
Money makes the world go 'round.
 
7:45 AM
Casino is illegal in Israel. :(
I went to the one in Jericho when it still existed.
(I was 17 or 18)
 
Well move somewhere better. :P
Online gambling is also an option, but it's less of a rush.
There's nothing like playing poker or blackjack at a real table with a real person.
 
@forest give me passport/visa and I'm there. :P
 
China has a lot of gambling resorts, even though it's technically illegal there.
 
ohh... no... not China..
 
I worked for a Chinese casino once. It was... interesting.
I prefer Los Vegas casinos anyway, but I hate how many cameras there are.
 
7:56 AM
Well they have to
Otherwise people will cheat and break the house
 
They couldn't break the house by cheating.
They would, however, end up taking more money than the cameras cost.
 
@ShaWiz I suspect the idea of the cameras is as much about "
You're being watched" than actual stuff
 
hmm...
 
8:48 AM
What would be suitable tags for this question: Magic link for MathOverflow in chat and comments? It seems that might be a good fit - but after I added , all five slots for tags are already taken.
 
9:38 AM
@Martin The tags have been edit by Glorfindel: meta.stackexchange.com/posts/301138/revisions
 
 
1 hour later…
10:53 AM
@Martin talking to yourself again? ;)
27 messages moved to Chimney
 
11:12 AM
Well, more intelligent audience would probably not find it interesting.
 
:/
 
I'd guess that there are many generic jokes around this (writer/lecture/whoever considers the stuff fine - and the punchline is that when somebody checks their own stuff, they do not have very intelligent audience).
 
Not everyone gets self depreciating humour
 
11:29 AM
I couldn't come up with a good response .....
 
It doesn't need to be good.
 
 
2 hours later…
1:47 PM
revathinair, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
1
This user posted spam, maybe should be destroyed?
 
I think accounts are only nuked if posted on multiple sites.
 
@rene they’ve made another account on SO, so maybe they have posted spam?
 
@rene accounts are nuked as we're made aware of them
I have an RSS feed from smoke detector of spam posts on MSE - so that tends to mean a lot of them go poof
So not necessarily multiple sites
just obviously a bad hat and well, someone sees them
 
@Feeds Not sure if that's an improvement or not.
 
@Catija if you're quick you can earn 50 rep: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/329450/…
 
@Catija - natural language search is awesome
Ever used ask jeeves before they rebranded to ask and went full... dumb?
 
2:18 PM
@rene Technically I have an additional 24 hours... but I also don't have a solution because... no one seems to think it's a particularly important thing to fix. :(
@JourneymanGeek Awww, I remember ask jeeves from when I was ... younger. Let's go with younger. I think I used it twice before I decided it was bad.
 
Actually
4
 
@Catija sounds like an answer ;)
 
It's not a particularly satisfying one.
 
@Catija chat gets no love :/
lol
Tried that with a random/bad question....
er... could use polish
1. I ran out of charecters
2. I will never exit vim
OH
ALSO
I can't read
> Describe the Java Programming Task
oops
 
life can't always be satisfying ...
@JourneymanGeek How to switch to a decent programming language?
 
2:29 PM
lol
I can't think of any java programming tasks...
granted my paycheck is reliant on a few strange Java applications
 
@JourneymanGeek something Factory should work
 
2:57 PM
Man, CROKAGE just does not want to give me javascript results. "HERE, HAVE SOME JAVA!"
 
Maybe spell it as java script ?
 
Ya. The blog post totally glosses that over.
 
3:17 PM
@SonictheAnonymousWizHog gone
@SonictheAnonymousWizHog gone
@SonictheAnonymousWizHog gone
 
meh
 
 
2 hours later…
5:20 PM
I'm out of options here maybe someone who can peek in a log can see something weird.
 
5:35 PM
waffles
 
6:31 PM
@rene Probably a CDN issue somewhere
 
6:47 PM
maybe, but their other browsers don't have the same problem.
 
 
3 hours later…
9:23 PM
17 messages moved to Chimney
 
There were so many people using data that the cell providers were overloaded and nobody had data.
 
10:21 PM
@Mithrandir context?
 
10:53 PM
@Stormblessed I was offline for a while.
 
11:23 PM
@rene It works in other browsers and in FF private mode. He's corrupted his FF profile and merely using other (obsolete) FF versions will not fix that.
The real question is who the duce upvoted such a poor question? It would belong on SU if it wasn't non-duplicable.
 
@AwesomePoodles How does corrupting an FF profile manage to persuade SE that data. doesn't exist?
 
@ArtOfCode There's all kinds of potential ways, probably what's left of an extension (or virus) redirecting/caching that request. Anyway, that's the only thing that explains why it works with diff FF versions, other browsers, and in private mode (where most extansions are blocked, depending).
 
I'm not sure where he says that he corrupted an FF profile.
 
@forest He didn't say that. I did. Nor did he try a new profile, as suggested in the comments.
 
oh
That's a freaking weird issue he's having.
 
11:37 PM
He's on Windows 6, BTW. He's lucky that's all it is.
 
It's serving a legitimate 404 so I can't imagine how malware would do it.
 
@AwesomePoodles I can't say I'm entirely sure how SE figures whether there's a site at a given subdomain or not, because that's not public - but it certainly seems like the kind of thing that would be decided server-side, i.e. unaffected by client changes.
 
Maybe he should try dumping his DNS cache.
Whatever is happening, chances are he's sending the wrong GET request.
Although it's not like it's a simple glitch, or the 404 would show him trying to access a bad URL (e.g. ata.stackexchange.com instead of data.stackexchange.com)...
 
@forest Aye, that seems like the only thing that would do it... I'm missing the link between "corrupted profile" and "bad GET", though.
 
So either SE itself is doing something funky, or there's an IDN homoglyph involved.
Well I can't see how a corrupted profile would do it either.
 
11:40 PM
@ArtOfCode Except he claims that other configs on his machine, DO see the page. It's corrupted cache on FF. Seen it before, but not for years.
 
SE won't just return "data.stackexchange.com cannot be found" unless something weird is going on.
 
Homoglyphs were the first thing that came to mind... no way of proving that if the OP wants to fool us, though.
 
So it's either a cache issue, a homoglyph, or SE returns 404 even if the path is correct.
 
@AwesomePoodles Okay, but how is it corrupted cache doing that? How does corruption => 404?
 
He should do a Firefox network inspector memory dump.
That'd answer it.
The 404 isn't cached though.
The Q&amp;A site <b>bla.stackexchange.com</b> doesn't seem to exist&hellip;<i>yet</i>.
 
11:42 PM
@ArtOfCode I don't know how exactly. Just know that I've seen it before and a corrupt FF profile is the only thing that fits all his claimed symptoms.
 
From a dump of the returned HTML.
 
@AwesomePoodles I don't get how, though. Sure, if I've got a headache I could diagnose it as a bleed on the brain because it fits the symptoms, but it's way more likely to be dehydration. Without understanding what's going on, it's nigh on impossible to make a correct assumption.
 
Can you provide a network dump using Firefox's network inspector? Go to the page that's giving you a 404, open Inspect Element (ctrl+shift+i), refresh the page that gave you a 404, go to the "Network" tab, right click on the data labeled "404", and click "Save All As HAR". — forest 5 mins ago
This will answer the question, if he does it.
 
@ArtOfCode Please explain how else it fails on FF, but not in private mode, and not from any other browser on the same machine. Perhaps the corruption/zombie extension/virus is inserting hidden characters in the URL? With that user, we will never know. My point is tha the question should be closed.
 
@AwesomePoodles If it was inserting hidden characters, the 404 would show that.
 
11:47 PM
not if they're zero-width...
 
It would show "Couldn't find asdfdata.stackexchange.com".
@ArtOfCode Those aren't valid in a URL. They'll become ASCII (punycode).
@ArtOfCode When I go to "bla☻.stackexchange.com", it returns the punycode version as expected: "Couldn't find xn--bla-8s5a.stackexchange.com"
 
@forest Browser might display it as invisible, though, even if behind the scenes it's punycode
 
The browser would display it as invisible in the URL bar (depending on settings), but not the HTML.
The HTML is raw ASCII: <h2>Couldn't find xn--bla-8s5a.stackexchange.com</h2>
 
@forest Even if it was an obsolete version of FF running on Windoze Vista?
 
Yes. It's the server that sends it as plain ASCII. The client isn't rendering any unicode.
 
11:52 PM
probably that's the browser converting the Unicode to puny client-side, sticking the result of that conversion in the Host header, and SE is sending the value of the Host header back
 
@forest If that's true, why did we have such a problem with fake URL's that were undetectable to the human eye, several browser versions ago?
 
@ArtOfCode I'm not sure what would happen if the Host header had unicode...
@AwesomePoodles That's still an issue actually for many browsers. And that's because the URL bar does render it as unicode. It's only detectable in SE's case because SE echos punycode back.
 
IDN homoglyphs don't work, either: this is a Cyrillic "a"
<p>
  The Q&amp;A site <b>xn--dta-6cd.stackexchange.com</b> doesn't seem to exist&hellip;<i>yet</i>.
</p>
 
That's because it's a limitation of the internet itself, not the browser.
Let me try changing the Host header...
400 error.
Sending "Host ☻.stackexchange.com" returns 400.
Sending "Host xn--84h.stackexchange.com" returns 404.
 
Ah, gottit
$ curl https://dаta.stackexchange.com -H "Host: dаta.stackexchange.com"
(cyrillic "a" again)
<p>
  The Q&amp;A site <b>dаta.stackexchange.com</b> doesn't seem to exist&hellip;<i>yet</i>.
</p>
 
11:57 PM
hm...
Which one has the cyrillic "a"?
 
first a in data
both occurrences
 
Regardless of my punycode settings, that returns "Couldn't find xn--dta-6cd.stackexchange.com".
 
type that command into your terminal, as I wrote it here
If this is what this user has done, I'm not sure how they've persuaded their browser to accept it without conversion, but it's proof that it's theoretically possible if you can do so
 

« first day (3297 days earlier)      last day (1724 days later) »