« first day (3288 days earlier)      last day (1731 days later) » 

12:27 AM
Normal Human is back!
@404 The website incorrectly states it as 2185
 
 
5 hours later…
5:02 AM
(Posting here because one of the CV reviewers reviewed as "Edit" to make a minor edit, without realizing that it results in a binding Leave Open outcome)
 
 
1 hour later…
6:20 AM
28 messages moved to Chimney
 
@SonictheAnonymousWizHog if its on smoke detector - I probably will get around to it ;p
 
@JourneymanGeek Those were getting instantly nuked as I was posting the messages...it wasn't you?
 
It was
there's a reasonable chance I might fall asleep and miss them though ;p
 
The first two were ones from a few months ago that were missed earlier
 
and I have a RSS feed of problem posts on MSE and SU for review for just this reason.
 
6:45 AM
The third is one that spammed a minute ago
 
well, those work
 
7:33 AM
!!/blame
 
@MetaAndrewT. It's Mithrandir's fault.
 
!!/watch taxionthego\.com
 
nope, wrong person.
 
plausible
 
@SonictheAnonymousWizHog You don't have code privileges, but I've created PR#3258 for you.
 
7:54 AM
3 messages moved to Chimney
 
8:18 AM
Morning.
 
\o
 
/o/
 
@Tinkeringbell Could you ping me when you have time? I want to ask you some advice, but I prefer to not share the details here
 
I feel this has something to do with MSO, but... shut eyes and ears
 
8:42 AM
lol
If it does, I'm sure we'll hear about it in 6-8 units of time
 
8:59 AM
@SPArchaeologist Sure, we can talk... But I'm busy for the next few hours, I think. If it's important and another mod can help you before that, let them (and me) know. Otherwise I'll ping you in a room once I have time :)
 
@JourneymanGeek well, I'm watching the never ending list, and the timing is a bit coincidence...
!!/alive
 
10:06 AM
@MetaAndrewT. self-deleter ...
 
@Tinkeringbell oh, nothing urgent. Just wanted an advice.
 
@rene I don't intend to update my post after each comment conversation, but hey... it's a stub! Hopefully someone will undelete and update it...
 
I'll stub it away
 
user248725
10:33 AM
Is there a Firearms.SE? I distinctly remember seeing one at some point but I can't find it now...
 
user248725
Oh, it's been closed :(
 
🔫.SE
 
11:38 AM
> And I work with SharePoint.
 
@rene the 4th circle of hell
 
@NicHartley Is it possible to re-open a proposal after a certain amount of time?
I mean, that was created 7 years ago. It might need another chance.
 
@forest not reopen, but repropose from the start
 
ah
 
12:00 PM
Probably a good idea to get a critical mass of early users first too
 
12:19 PM
critical mass detected, beginning nuclear reaction sequence
 
 
1 hour later…
1:28 PM
and so, I just realized. Even though it's a CW, the author still has the full privilege to delete it anytime. Does the wiki really mean "giving up ownership"?
 
good point
 
1:43 PM
+1
 
2:16 PM
10 messages moved to Chimney
@MetaAndrewT. I am convinced CW is essentially meaningless
 
@JourneymanGeek hmm... that's probably the least concern of allow answer stub on meta (Warning: MSO link?)
 
@MetaAndrewT. eh
I walk through the valley of the shadow of meta. And I do not fear. Cause I'm a dog.
 
I wif I waf a dog
 
2:33 PM
@JourneymanGeek a colleague has a new dog that looks almost exactly like ash
only a bit lighter in color
and he's a massive scaredy cat
 
@Magisch ask them what it is?
Could be a white snauzer
 
cabanese
like this but with more mustache and more scaredy cat:
she brings him to work for a few months to socialize him. Very well behaved and friendly, but easily startled & scared
 
Havanese?
ya, decendant from ship dogs. Actually a terrier offshoot...
not the most couragous dogs
 
a no-RO meta chat room would be fun...
 
not possible
there's always an RO
either the person who created the room, or people with sufficient tenure
 
2:41 PM
put RO hat on Smoke Detector
 
on the other hand
unless there's trouble, our ROs and mods don't do much
 
3:13 PM
if there are no ROs, the chat will auto promote someone with a certain % of messages eventually
 
 
2 hours later…
5:34 PM
This is going to be "good cop, bad cop" all over again...
 
5:58 PM
A few users reporting for being serial upvoted on SO? What is this? Summer of Love?
 
 
404
6:17 PM
@Feeds Explainxkcd mostly sorted out the issue: the number 2185 is used for both the Sunday update and for Monday comic, which is okay because the page title has the comic title appended. One can't get to Sunday update by forward/back navigation, but it's accessible from the list of all comics.
 
6:44 PM
@Magisch won't mods just delete them from chat too?
 
7:02 PM
@canon There's a general agreement that mods won't do that in general, and there was also a discussion with mods about the chatroom going into effect before it did so, with explicit mod approval.
Of course there's no guarantee that will always be the case...
 
7:17 PM
hmm. i've received a few upvotes over the weekend too. didn't think much of it
 
7:48 PM
@TylerH I suppose mods are one thing... employees are another. A separate peace?
 
eh, i'd imagine getting some things deleted from that room would be a necessity, if it's just archiving all comments ever made there.
but there'd be no reason to go around deleting the discussion/criticism/notabsurdlypastthethresholdofacceptable etc.
 
well, it's interesting to see a whole post getting deleted due to the comment thread, and the comments are still archived...
for the best of transparency, I guess
OTOH,
27
Q: Meta does "not host discussion or debate", according to mod message

l4mpiI just got a mod mod message due to my comment activity on meta, which I find problematic in various ways. As there is no mention of not sharing this message, I hope it's fine to ask a question about it. Here's the text in full (emphasis theirs, but leaving out a few links to chat and the help pa...

 
@canon You vastly overestimate the amount of free time we have. :P IPS had this long before they created it for SO and I spent 0 time reading it when I was a mod... not really going to spend time looking at it now.
 
It was entirely volunteers watching that.
Is, I should say.
 
8:10 PM
Have I misinterpreted TinyGiant? meta.stackoverflow.com/a/388164/621962
 
I interpreted it as more of a thing to do for questions that are good enough to become a faq
not just a replacement place for discussion
 
I asked him for examples of the type of "partial answer" he's talking about and the only things he referenced were discussion-oriented comments which were asking him questions related to his post.
 
@MetaAndrewT. well that 💩 hit the fan
2
 
8:43 PM
I'm beginning to think SO should be split into two sites. Debugging.so and KB.so, where the former is for the quick debugging questions and the latter is moderated and migrated highly voted questions from the former. The main diff is that the former has no duplicate close, and wipes questions after a few months.
 
Also Meta.SO (the peaceful one), and Meta.Meta.SO (the noisy one)
 
nah... dumpster.🔥.so
meta was IIRC always intended to be the garbage dump to some extent. The place where discussions went off rails and only stayed within the textbook lines of civility
The issue is at the moment that the relationship between users and SE is getting rather toxic
 
Also, I don't see Cody anymore on the MSO...
 
9:25 PM
I can't blame him
There is asomewhat misguided user here. There should be a review task in the LQQ
 
err
 

« first day (3288 days earlier)      last day (1731 days later) »