I have read in a feature request about Android app: "In the Android app, can we have some option to mark a read notification to unread? I know that this option is not available in the web version of Stack Exchange sites."
I did not know that this is possible on the full site (desktop version) - is that really true? Where can I find that option?
Oh, I've seen some comment alongside those lines in connection with pluralization. Since it was mentioned here with font sizes, I thought about fonts and characters.
@JourneymanGeek I think that saying came from "Animal House" (but I've no time at the moment to find the exact clip, definitely not those guys). If you want the video of my Friday nights (of days gone by) then take the audio from this video: youtu.be/5sHr-STomzo and the visual of this video: youtu.be/v_kni8_0JmY and that's pretty close to my drinking buddies.
Ads (=spam) make a bad impression on visitors, and they do nothing to resolve low quality posts. In my opinion, it's time that users bought an annual subscription that provides access to the entire network. New users pay a smaller fee to have access to SE for four months. If they're happy with the experience, they'll renew and buy a year's subscription. This will ensure quality questions, or at the very least new contributors will have read the help center before paying the fee. Users with 20K should be exempt, the site is free for them, as they have proven to provide valuable content. — Mari-Lou A7 hours ago
This'd be a nice way to kick me out. And every other Iranian on these sites.
Yeah, this won't happen. But I totally can envision SE starting to sell "Premium Account" in some variant.
Anyone will be able to use anything like before, but if they're impatient to get privileges and got the money, they'll be able to simply buy those privileges.
@JourneymanGeek nah.. maybe.... I won't be around to check. The day they announce such a thing, I'm out. Will delete all my accounts and stop using SE.
Marsha (foaled 16 March 2013) is an Irish-bred, British-trained Thoroughbred racehorse and broodmare. She was a specialist sprinter, all but one of whose victories came over the minimum distance of five furlongs (1000 metres). After winning two minor races as a juvenile in 2015, she made progress throughout the following year, taking the Land O'Burns Fillies' Stakes and the City Walls Stakes before ending her season with a win in the Prix de l'Abbaye. In 2017 she added wins in the Palace House Stakes and the Nunthorpe Stakes and was sold at the end of the year for a record price of 6,000,000 guineas...
@Marshmallow nah.... maybe Shadow The Mar Wizard
:P
@Marshmallow since it's Google ads it means you'll get them according to what you search for. So if you really don't search for bras online, you'll be safe. ;)
@ShadowTheCurlyBracedWizard They have been successfully, magnificently irrelevant before. I never ever play browser games but that's what I keep getting on other sites with Google ads
@rene sadly the high ratio on Islam.SE doesn't surprise me, although I'm not an active contributor there. Imagine if there was an emacsvsvim.SE. That's basically the situation in Islam.
@Marshmallow yeah, I hand selected two sites that I expected to have an explicit voting culture. I'm biased. To do justice I'll create the network wide query.
> Most pride events occur annually, and many take place around June to commemorate the 1969 Stonewall riots in New York City, a pivotal moment in modern LGBTQ social movements.[4]
@canon I've got a sociology book on a theory that states a lot of big problems have been fixed for a lot of people, so people start focusing on ever smaller stuff. In order to get enough attention though, they need to blow the small stuff up to big stuff proportions.
So I wouldn't say institutions are pandering more easily or that people have gotten more sensitive, but simply that the problems they're struggling with every day have changed in nature
I mean, why do I rant about the way my company treats females from time to time, instead of focusing on solving world hunger or climate change? Because neither of the latter is a direct, big problem in my life.
@canon Perhaps it's related to the fact that the climate is going to \w{4} and that you live in the USA you need to work 17 hours per day if you want to pay off school, and if you wake up in the hospital, you know you won't be able to pay the rent for the next 70 years, and if you're lucky enough to not live in USA, or on an overcrowded peninsula, or to a $religion in a country that despises $religion, or [snip], you'll still hear of plenty people that do live in those places.
Conspiracy theory, they retired the Reversal Badge badge because the reversal badges call attention to all the highly downvoted company announcements such as the Network Ad posts
@KevinB But right now, what do a lot of downvotes say? That people don't want ads at all? That they have worries and questions, like some of the answers express? That they're booty-bothered over the timing of the announcement?
That they find the discussion not useful, unclear, or lacking research effort?
The tools available don't allow us to provide such a reason in a way that scales.
We can downvote, leave a comment, and/or answer. or any combination of those. but it's unreasonable to expect 50 or 200 or more people to leave answers/comments saying the same thing
True. But why should Meta be any different from Main sites with regards to just sticking votes to what they're meant for, and comments and answers too?
The announcement is asking you to give feedback on the ads, you stick to giving feedback on the ads.
Frankly i find announcements being made in blog posts offensive, because it eliminates the ability to easily provide feedback. We can't just click a reaction button, or upvote a comment.
@KevinB Perhaps not. But the announcement about new badges didn't get a flood of downvotes, and there were some good questions on MSE about the effects of them nonetheless, so...
Another example... On SO, i often come across well crafted questions that can easily be answered, that aren't necessarily duplicates, but... they're so specific and localized and poorly worded/titled that they'll never be useful to anyone else. We don't have any tools that we can use to express that reaction clearly without causing the OP to feel like they've been slighted
other than jsut not reacting and letting useless content continue to pile up
I think if there were enough people curating SO, there'd be time to help with the 'poorly worded/titled' stuff to at least make sure others can find it?
this for example is a fairly straightforward question, won't be that difficult to answer, but it's sooooo specific no one is ever going to encounter this problem and find this question. It could be improved, such as removing the no jquery requirement and letting that be a second question, or... i dunno, doing a bit more work before asking, but as is it's certainly answerable.
they don't fit neatly into the box of content the site was supposedly designed for. they're outliers. we could just ignore them, they'll keep coming, getting answered, showing up in irrelevant search every now and then, etc. not a huge problem. but my point wasn't really about this question in particular, i've gotten off track
it's that the downvote is made for expressing that feedback
along with a lot of other types of feedback
you can't both downvote it for being useless and upvote it for being well written and answerable
In comments, some people voluntarily write "+1" or "-1" to indicate what they did vote-wise on the post. But when people want to say that they weren't the person who downvoted, there's no way to really say that concisely. So I propose "±0", which would function the exact same way but mean that th...
which is entirely useless for providing useful feedback on meta
I don't see meta as this special snowflake where voting all of a sudden doesn't make sense. It doesn't make sense everywhere. You can't determine why someone upvoted or downvoted posts on stackoverflow either, or ips, or anywhere else. it's anonymous by design. Not voting at all means you're suppressing your opinion entirely, not giving it, which doesn't feel good.
I don't have any ideas for a solution, but i don't think using another platform that suppresses feedback is the answer.