@user1271772 How is it that we had just discussed Glorfindel's name earlier and you were just obviously looking at it in the user list and you still spell it wrong
It's as if Italian is the ONLY language where it can possibly be masculine.... would downvote if I could
I'm going to have another baby boy, and name him Simone. Then I can edit that wiki article to say "Simone (given name), a feminine (or masculine, in Italian, or English) given name of Hebrew origin"
I recently looked at the meta.math.stackexchange.com and found the second anniversary was celebrated. As in the last year's Happy-Birthday post (linked therein) , some people declared the addiction to the site.
My question is: What kind of addiction is this?
Certainly some kind of internet addi...
The last time we lifted the level cap was in 2015. In 2014, we added a unilateral close-as-duplicate power for gold tag badge holders, but no new reputation level. So we've been thinking about giving users more reasons to keep playing. (I've answered this question with some circumstantial evidenc...
In general, if I write to Stack Exchange support via /contact, how long should I expect until I get a reply? Is a reply even guaranteed?
Specifically when asking for a community manager to help with two moderators fighting with each other (so "Other" in the field asking for the reason for contacting).
A lot of us have waited a very long time for the SE team to respond to a contact request via the contact form. Some of us just get impatient waiting, especially if we believe that the issue is (quote) "important". Also, the SE team gets a rather large volume of contact requests within each catego...
I mean I just saw some stuff on meta and politely asked what the official stance is. I was quickly belittled and called "not a member of their community" for not having much rep, among other things. So despite not wanting to judge the situation without having more information, I certainly have an opinion now.
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog Well, at least your response implies that this is pretty rare on Stack Exchange, if you can immediately pinpoint where the drama is coming from without me specifying the actual site. :P
@forest True. On Wikipedia, it happens often enough that they have an official policy on wheel-warring by admins: all admins involved in the wheel war get their privileges revoked.
user168476
We aren't wikipedia, though. (And I think in many ways thats a good thing)
@Ash Yeah, in this case I wouldn't argue for the mod who was reopening the question to have their moderator privileges revoked, since they were clearly acting in accordance with community consensus.
I mean I started by refusing to pass judgement (I know how much shit mods can get from unruly users), but I certainly have an opinion now. Though I don't really want to bring up drama in this room (not meaning to complain about them here, you just happened to guess what I was referring to by moderator fights. :P)
@forest When it comes to mods violating rules, one has to keep the Super Mario Problem into account: it shouldn't be that conduct that gets a normal user suspended should only get a mod de-modded.
I've never heard that metaphor, but I take it that it's referring to big Mario being turned into little Mario when taking damage instead of losing a life?
The proper analogy is that of Sonic: there's no "super" status, and taking damage with rings will cause Sonic to lose the rings, akin to getting suspended and losing all rep, and taking damage a second time causes Sonic to die (akin to deleting the account)
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog FYI that's not the typical "hacker" spam we usually see, but a case could be made for that post being abusive of the poster's husband (see discussion in CHQ).
@Makyen I don't think it's your code that caused it. It's also not that big a deal, I've learned to easily work around it
Just looks like 2 SE built interfaces that aren't designed to work with each other, but that's ok, the script still works as intended, only in ~20% of cases you have to drag the flag dialog away a lil
1. Get to someone's rep history, 2. Find an expandable rep event with the flag link (2 or more), 3. click flag on it. Now every time you click inside the flag dialog the event will collapse / expand
@user1271772 I see that the script manages to downvote the question, but does not 'highlight' the downvote button. I was planning to have it reload the page after all actions have been done, that would solve that problem. Thanks for notifying me about it.
Message appearing when a user was removed.
It seems I lost 1765 reputation points on Stack Overflow yesterday. The reason given in my history is "removed", with the description of "User was removed (learn more)". I don't understand what that means. What caused this?
Return to FAQ index
@OptimusPrime Only if they have +3 score, which is impossible for suggested edits, and it applies to posts, not users. Likely it's either a tag wiki suggested edit or an old suggested edit from the time you didn't have editing privileges.
@Tinkeringbell But you don't get to keep your privileges if the site graduates
And as Shog said earlier, appointed mods are subject to higher scrutiny, whereas the only rule for elections is not having been suspended on any site in the past year.
@ShadowWizard well, it relied on a server and based on the comments I concluded it was some free (no costs) hosting offer. That doesn't last forever. So if you now click on an image in that answer you end up on a place you don't want to be.
@Tinkeringbell RE your comment: the other question that caused them to gain more rep was one about the mobile app. The mobile app is not at all clear about which site you're posting the question on once you navigate to the "ask question" view. It's likely that the user posted on the wrong site.
@rene You were the original author of that comment. I don't like one thing about it: it merely states that "your question will not be answered on this specific site", but with no explanation why or what site they're on.
"Your question is definitely off-topic for Meta" insinuates to a small proportion of users that there are a certain few users who would violate site rules and post an answer anyway (which happens very frequently on SO). My wording, "unfortunately, we have to mark this question as 'off-topic' for this site" doesn't imply that.
@rene The vast majority of people aren't gonna click on a link.
@rene You were the original author of that comment. I don't like one thing about it: it merely states that "your question will not be answered on this specific site", but with no explanation why or what site they're on.
"Your question is definitely off-topic for Meta" insinuates to a small proportion of users that there are a certain few users who would violate site rules and post an answer anyway (which happens very frequently on SO). My wording, "unfortunately, we have to mark this question as 'off-topic' for this site" doesn't imply that.
now... Here's the thing to remember when discussing policies surrounding suspensions, de-modding, etc
Read, please.
Moderators have been suspended. And not every normal user gets suspended in every scenario either. We aim to do as little as possible; killing every gnat with a 12lb maul just wrecks the furniture.
> So the people said something would have to be done, but their projects did not at all tally; some said, 'Put a fence 'round the edge of the cliff, ' some, 'An ambulance down in the valley.'
you don't have to be perfect; you don't even have to be good; if you can be a little better than your nature for a little bit now and then, then together we can build something from that
hey, I don't mind opinions with rough edges but with a bit more tact you could have left a message that didn't get flags. Now don't blame the flaggers. You're the one who pressed "send"
@AndrasDeak : I don't understand either of those acronyms
@andmyself @Glorfindel, I'm in favor of this. There's no need to crush people's hearts right? Can we add an if-statement: "if score is > -3, then downvote" ? Or maybe your idea is even better, the one where you give people the option to downvote
@andmyself : Does anyone know how to quote things the way this post did?