still it's causing quite some pain for us, generally speaking. I'm sure Grace has a full list of discussions where we generally swear against the character limit.
@Jin In reality, nothing. I was just frustrated because I can't programmatically change the stylesheet due to cross-domain restrictions and the definition in the stylesheet didn't match the change I was making in the HTML, heh.
Mainly, I was trying to fix the blasphemous HTML that causes this to happen, but the links are styled as .post-menu > a and I wanted to wrap them in floated <li>s
Oh, you know what, I bet I know why that might be too, that's fair.
@badpssockpuppet No. I was suggesting that if you have [magic] that describes a series, and [whatever] that describes a specific entry in that series, both are valid for a given question.
At any rate I personally think a tag for series and a tag for the specific game is just not what we've been doing so far. We already have [game-name-series] for questions about series (say, [half-life-series]
under your scheme, @Shog9, how'd you tag Half Life 2? [half-life] [2]?
The problem with the [proprietary super-class] and [specific game] tag combo is that there are a whole lot of series where the first game in that series is the same name as the super class
Consider the Legend of Zelda series, wherein the first game is called The Legend of Zelda. Even if we use a tag like [zelda-series] as the overarching system, how do you get people to not use [legend-of-zelda] instead when it clearly is a Legend of Zelda game?