> Do you wait to make an important decision before reading your horoscope? Have you ever turned down a date because your zodiac signs weren’t compatible? Do you have a little tattoo of your zodiac sign on your ankle?
@ShadowWizard that is precisely the source of the above allusion. Only difference, in that movie the elephants were replaced with the statues of the people that had started asking too much questions...
@JasonC OK, first you need some dutch-tape. Then, you will have to wrap the box firmly in the tape. Then...... Why?? You tooo tape? Trusty companion of so many life-hacks, you too betray me now?
@JasonC sounds fun until you're the guy handling the "support request" for a "working application" that you know isn't even up and running at the time.
Welcome to The Stack Overflow Podcast, recorded September 20 at our headquarters in NYC. This week’s episode is brought to you by adorable otters, who hold hands at night so they don’t float away from each other. The episode is also brought to you by Compose, an IBM company. Compose is a production-ready, cloud hosted platform for building enterprise applications on open source database technologies.
My friend says hes pretty smart, and gets bored easily. So he has to constantly come up with new games and stuff to keep him active. Sort of a continuous uphill battle.
@JasonC For a kitten for you to get at the same time as your saluki puppy to keep poochie in his place racing-wise, I recommend a pair of cheetah cubs.
Cheetahs are beautiful but I've got my heart set on caracals. And I'd love to have them all but I think it'd start to exceed my ability to take care of them. Plus, I feel like there would be unavoidable carnage.
No, no. I've had lots of issues with my trying too hard to impress others, so to speak. It's caused by some unrealistic expectations I've gone through while I was a young child.
I'm learning to break away from these historical issues.
I've tended to seek excessive amounts of attention about my behavior and my trying to become a moderator.
> I've taken the opportunity to think about why I've been behaving like this in chat and have determined that for historical reasons related to my upbringing, I've been trying too hard to impress others. I'll focus on actually delivering improvements, accepting that they may not be obvious at first glance ("do, don't say").
That's pretty much it.
This does not change the goals themselves (e.g. I will continue to work on thinking before I speak or act), but I'm not going to stress over it too much.
If you're on thin ice, just stop posting to chat until you figure out how to avoid the thin ice. When you come back, it's thawed water under the bridge.
So, see ya in a bit. There'll be a renewed focus on actually making real improvements, rather than just trying to impress others or hitting unrealistic standards. After all (see context for some background):
Guys, I was just looking at the HNQ formula. I'm curious, does this formula imply that answers with negative scores will detract from the hotness of the question to which they are answers? Or will those answers not affect the hotness at all? @tchrist @ShadowWizard
@AaronHall Are you serious? That would certainly be abuse of the system. And how would I even go about that? Post an absolutely totally wrong answer? Of course not. I'm just curious.
I think a lot of people would like veto power over the HNQ list. It seems once something gets on the list, it tends to stay on it.
I love this:
I got 3 (edit: whoops, make that 4?) upvotes on my answer today, Jeb. You got 1 on your question so far today: stackoverflow.com/posts/472000/timeline - I wonder if people are witholding votes from you for some reason... — Aaron Hall1 min ago
I think you're a bit lost. This is a question and answer platform with Cryptocurrencies in general as topic. You may find suitable a contact here: stellar.org/contact — Murch ♦7 mins ago
@AaronHall if they're happy with the way it's currently working, i find that sort of weird. But I've ranted enough in the answers to the questions I linked to in the previous message. So I'll leave it at that.
Big business hueristic: if it ain't broke, don't fix it. I seriously doubt they're going to look at it and say, "it's broke." Instead, they probably like the self-fulfilling prophecy. "Wow, look at the votes relative to others! These Q&A's are really hot!" That probably makes it more likely some of them will get picked up on Hacker News, Reddit, or some other site where it could really go viral.
@Fiksdal 99.9% sure. Guess @Oded or @Adam can tell really for sure by looking at the code, if they have a minute. But why not fair? IMO it's perfectly fine and fair.
"Simpsons Already Did It" is the seventh episode of the sixth season of the American animated television series South Park, and the 86th episode of the series overall. It originally aired on Comedy Central in the United States on June 26, 2002. In the episode, which continues on from the events of the previous episode "Professor Chaos", Butters thinks up a series of schemes to take over the world, but realizes that each one has already been performed on The Simpsons. Meanwhile, Ms. Choksondik dies and Cartman, Kyle and Stan think that they are responsible.
The episode was written by series co-creator...
@ShadowWizard Well, because: Let's say you have a highly upvoted question with a lot of highly upvoted answers. It's hot. Then, some idiot comes along and posts a totally incorrect, terrible answer that can't be deleted because it's technically an answer. It gets voted down to -30. That terrible answer doesn't really have anything to do with the good content that has made the Q/A hot. So why should it detract from the hotness?
All in all, Hot Question does not mean good question. Just interesting question that tend to draw lots of attention. In the long run, this harms Stack Exchange by lowering the overall quality in my opinion, but not a fatal blow. Guess the team decided the advantages, of more traffic between sites, outweigh the disadvantages.
@ShadowWizard Totally agree. It's exactly what I've said in this answer and this answer. In both those Q/As, you find plenty of suggestions on how to limit the obvious problems with HNQ, without shutting down the HNQ system. However, I don't know if letting negatively scoring answers detract from hotness helps do that. It just seems to be a result of the formula that they might not have considered.
I think they're aiming for notoriety and cross-pollenation at the expense of potentially annoying some of the moderating core site users. It is what it is. I'd probably choose to do the same thing if I were them.
So if that's true, you can kinda exercise a sort of veto by downvoting everything on the question.
But good luck if it's a runaway success, you won't win.
@AaronHall I do that with questions that are actually not very good. But I can't bring myself to downvote the answers, that just feel wrong. (Assuming they are good.)
It doesn't help, though, because even if the question is poor, the answers get tons of upvotes, simply due to exposure and mere probabilty
@Fiksdal well, you can ask David for the real reasoning behind the decision, and maybe re-consider it now with the HNQ becoming big deal. He's still active, think he's the developers "big boss" by now.
Principle - don't question the voter's motives. You might not like the ideas you raise. And you usually have absolutely no proof. So we don't. Besides, I think the community agrees that downvotes are warranted on (even correct) answers that shouldn't have been written due to the poorness of the question.
IMO the best way to deal with it is to give downvotes a lot of weight in removing hotness. Another way would be to not allow people with 101 rep who have never contributed on that site to vote on questions/answers that are currently in the HNQ list.
@AaronHall What do you mean by "don't question the voter's motives. You might not like the ideas you raise. And you usually have absolutely no proof. So we don't."?
@bwDraco You mean send him an email saying: Dear David. IMO the HNQ system is flawed. Here's how to fix it. (...) Best regards, some SE user?
@Fiksdal also, it's not about being fair or not fair. It's all about the content. With HNQ, content means both the question and all of its answer - so if some answers are bad then yes, it means the whole thing is less hot.
@ShadowWizard Meh, I disagree with that. A very poor answer has little or nothing to do with the rest of the Q and As. Some guy made a poor answer. Anyway, no big deal. And I agree that really bad answers should probably be deleted as VLQ or NAA anyway, so it's not a big deal at all. Certainly not something I care to contact that Adam guy about.
@AaronHall don't think so, they just changed the design. Contents are the same as far as I could see. Very basic explanations, very basic examples, and that's it.
> The King David statue is placed at the site believed to be the King David’s tomb, which is on Mount Zion. The entry to the Tomb of King David is through a courtyard - where the statue of King David is located. The entire complex has three simple rooms with wooden benches.
@AaronHall this, or someone you pissed off looking for revenge. Question downvotes costs no rep. Can't really know, and better not bothering too much over it.... if you know the question is good and can't be improved, it's enough. :)
The answer was down voted because I lost my keys. Please, stay with me, let me explain this odd chain of events.
Earlier today I couldn't get to the store on time because I could not find my keys. That caused me to miss the opportunity to run over a golf ball, which would have bounced between a...
At least not one that wasn't reversed. And sometimes I get multiple upvotes on the same answer in the same short time-frame. Is it random? Is it a fan with multiple accounts? What's up with that?
If you want to have fans, you'll probably have haters, I suppose.
@AaronHall heh, this can be dangerous. Ask this user - he was known as UniKitty, and got a full year suspension on arqade after, from what he says, being stalked by user called UniDoggy pretending to be him or something like that.
@ShadowWizard My alma mater has a /16 block to itself (College of Staten Island: 163.238.0.0/16). IP addresses are assigned statically to individual workstations and dynamically (via DHCP) to devices on the Wi-Fi network.
This isn't an unusual arrangement, and it does mean that each system has a fixed public IP address.
AFAIK, there's an automatic thing that's supposed to happen to chat when accounts are merged, but... If and when it doesn't... Then chances are chat will be broken for that account.
if you see someone complaining, tell 'em /contact & we'll get 'em sorted.