« first day (1665 days earlier)      last day (3584 days later) » 
00:00 - 14:0014:00 - 00:00

00:00
Huh wha?
@SmokeDetector tpu
@hichris123 Blacklisted user.
@SmokeDetector gone
@bluet reviews homework instead
Tho tomorrow might be another cold day (-5 F˚)
00:15
@bluet needs 70 rep to help
user259867
s/help/get review banned in a couple of days/
@FamousBlueRaincoat in before you get review banned.
@Braiam If you don't rollback my edit, you keeps teh 10 repz :P
user259867
I'm triaging right now and am contemplating a question from "29 minutes ago" with comments dated by February 10... hmm...
user259867
Also: "answers 0 // accepted yes". Looks legit
3
00:23
I accepted your non-existent answer. You got a problem with that?
@FamousBlueRaincoat maybe the system should auto-fail you when you sit on an audit for 3 minutes without any action
user259867
Hey don't discriminate against slow readers.
Obviously, audits are meant to be obvious by design, so if you take too long it should auto-fail you since you obviously didn't think it was obvious
nb4 I get review banned
karma
user259867
@bluet That one was a known good. But I could be thinking if there is a duplicate for that... because if there is, the route is Unsalvageable -> dupe.
@bluet audits have a tendency to be either really obvious or cause for a meta post
00:28
true
user259867
Of course, if a known-good audit is indeed a duplicate, and the reviewer is the first to recognize that... too bad for the reviewer
yay, within a repcap of 20k and meta.stackexchange.com/questions/249951/… is still giving me free rep >:D
user259867
@Undo Downvoted. Commas as digit separators are evil.
user259867
Thin space ftw.
@FamousBlueRaincoat you're a bad person :(
although I have to admit I do like the thin space asthetic-or-however-you-spell-that
00:31
@Undo that would be funny if you got to 19998 rep at the end of the day
@bluet I'd go find an accept or something somewhere
or suggest an edit to something the next day :P
Here’s a rare view into how things are #managed here at @StackExchange: http://t.co/IOwalS5Q1m
@Undo either "too broad" or "unclear" would work
@Undo I'm tempted to use some sort of ad hominem, but I think 'waste of my time' covers it.
00:40
And @BenCollins still has his chat diamond.
there used to be a "very low quality" vote that allowed you to indicate that the question failed to show even the most basic effort at self-answering, but that's now part of the triage queue
@hichris123 not for long, I'm sure
until chat resyncs it, which IIRC might be a while
(hours, maybe days)
:3086867 Probably just hid all of the accounts
Yeah, I realized that. :P
00:46
Student: "Can we just not try on the PARCC tests?"
Teacher: "No! It affects my salary!"
user259867
There is no Area 51 proposal for edlin. Internet, you disappoint me.
user259867
@BenCollins Duly removed from the list SE employees on Twitter. Btw you still have "@StackExchange dev" there.
bleh.. facebook official is all that matters
This is why Robert gets paid the big bucks meta.lifehacks.stackexchange.com/q/2431/143
glad to see good progress being made
i still do think the titles suck
? magic
user259867
01:08
@SmokeDetector fp black magic
@FamousBlueRaincoat Registered question as false positive and added title to Bayesian doctype 'good'.
in a gaming context, what means OP?
overpowered?
yeah
01:27
// ==UserScript==
// @name        Powerschool Quarter Points
// @author       bjb568
// @version      1.0
// @namespace    bjb568
// @include      powerschool.cps-k12.org/guardian/scores.html*
// ==/UserScript==
var a = 0,
	b = 0
	e = document.getElementsByClassName('bold-underline');
for (var i = 0; i < e.length; i++) {
	var t = e[i].textContent;
	if (t.indexOf('-') != -1) continue;
	a += parseInt(t.split('/')[0]);
	b += parseInt(t.split('/')[1]) || 0;
}
document.getElementsByTagName('h1')[0].textContent += ' ' + a + '/' + b;
Why didn't I do this earlier…
I can tell now how much each point is worth and exactly how well I'm doing in each class.
@FamousBlueRaincoat do you mean my list? That won't go away
user259867
@BenCollins I meant your Twitter profile.
user259867
Thanks for pointing out the list; it would save me some time if I knew about it earlier.
Saw Cartaino's LH meta posts 5 hours late... was at a conference
Oh, ok. I'll get that tonight sometime
01:35
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in body: USB Wifi card TL-WN823N in Ubuntu 14.04.2 by Mario Ramirez on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive title detected, Offensive body detected: Who shovels shit in full communism? by Samuel Russell on politics.stackexchange.com
user259867
@SmokeDetector ignore ugly formatting
@FamousBlueRaincoat Post ignored; alerts about it will no longer be posted.
@SmokeDetector suggested edit
@SmokeDetector fp
@Frank Registered question as false positive and added title to Bayesian doctype 'good'.
01:40
@KevinBrown Repeating characters seems to be a really good judge of "needs editing".
user259867
Yeah, I got some +2 from these posts on a bunch of sites... then decided to take a closer look at Ask Ubuntu and now have 125 there. Another step toward "downvote everywhere" privilege.
user259867
Although most posts on Ubuntu are too sad even to be downvoted.
01:53
8
Q: A Lifehacks Manifesto

Robert CartainoThis is a gentle introduction to what this Lifehacks site is about. For a bit more detail about how we got here, see the Un-Manifesto. Welcome to Lifehacks! We can't teach you how to wire your stereo or how to learn a new language; but if you need to open a bottle of wine but don't have a corkscrew

[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in title: fcghdfggggggggggggggggggggggg by mart on math.stackexchange.com
Rollback plz ^ @Famous
user259867
@hichris123 Not sure; I think the present version is better.
lol
user259867
02:03
It will get closed sooner in this form.
user259867
But another user rolled back anyway.
02:38
Hey, where's @InfiniteRecursion been?
8
star star
wondered that myself.
user259867
@Frank NAA
lel
user259867
It's become a reflex. Was looking for the flag button, but it's not in the usual place.
last message 17d ago
last seen 15h ago
about:
> cya :)
lol
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: ANSWERS OF FEW HYPERBOLIC FUNCTIONS by Anonymous Guest on tex.stackexchange.com
user259867
@SmokeDetector VLQ. And I can downvote on TeX - LaTeX :)
03:31
I'm leaning toward not spam
I'm leaning towards NAA
user259867
@Andy The link is to Twitter post with a screenshot of bitbucket maintenance message.
user259867
NAA
@Andy cv-opls no repro
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in answer: Signature instead of PIN, Visa card by pig seller96 on security.stackexchange.com
user259867
03:43
@SmokeDetector tpu SPAM (both posts by same user)
@FamousBlueRaincoat Blacklisted user.
user259867
^ 3rd post by same user, went undetected
Decided to notify blog.com about that one
@FamousBlueRaincoat gone
@FamousBlueRaincoat IT'S SEEMS LEGIT YOU OLD PERSON
user259867
03:53
lol
user259867
Would you care to show us the program and tell us what language it is written in. For all we know your program reads Console.Log("'-1.#j'") — Nick Bailey 4 mins ago
okeydonkey userscript workey
04:18
status-needs-one-more
Going to beeeeeed…
> put on hold as unclear what you're asking by bjb568, Kevin Brown, Hobo Sapiens, Lynn Crumbling, AstroCB just now
The Tavern strikes again.
3
04:36
kthxbai
megotobed
Night!
user259867
Strange that Smokey did not pick this up: the post has "weight loss" at the beginning, certainly within the bodySummary.
user259867
!!/status?
@FamousBlueRaincoat Running since 04:34:37 UTC
user259867
04:55
177
Q: Help us test the shiny new "User Activity" page! (Plus a bunch of new features.)

JaydlesToday, we're shipping the new "Activity Page" of the Profile here on Meta SE, so you can test it out and hopefully share some feedback and suggestions before we ship it network wide. Hate words? Assuming you're signed in, just click your face up in the top bar, and you can see it right now. Or,...

^ Only one downvote so far; impressive.
I blame @Jaydles for being too likeable.
user259867
05:24
@SmokeDetector gone
06:09
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Skin Care Google Search by ferry lorry on drupal.stackexchange.com
user259867
@SmokeDetector tpu
@FamousBlueRaincoat Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Skin Care Supplements and Reviews by jan miller on meta.stackexchange.com
user259867
@SmokeDetector tpu
@FamousBlueRaincoat Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: which one Great muscle building supplement? by hold nsdl on superuser.com
user259867
@SmokeDetector tpu
06:14
@FamousBlueRaincoat Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
user259867
both gone
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Muscle Supplement Review by veklupidmh on drupal.stackexchange.com
user259867
@SmokeDetector tpu
@FamousBlueRaincoat Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
07:28
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Nouvebelle Anti Aging Cream Anti Aging Tips And Guide by mosolgara on meta.stackexchange.com
@SmokeDetector tpu
@bummi Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
@FamousBlueRaincoat Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
07:56
Morning!
@FamousBlueRaincoat Gone.
It contains the famous "which is better?" phrasing.
And the answer contains "in my opinion".
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: XSS EXPLOIT JAVA SCRIPT by Westel Gamers on stackoverflow.com
@hichris123 I went for a vacation :D
We get... vacation?
3
A: Help us test the shiny new "User Activity" page! (Plus a bunch of new features.)

nicaelThe avatar preview when editing profile is too small; enlarge this preview please to the size it was earlier?

08:23
@SmokeDetector tpu
@InfiniteRecursion Blacklisted user.
That looks like spam bait and spam.
Both users reg'd today, only question and only answer.
@J.Steen same feeling ... but how to be sure
Benefit of the doubt, I guess.
Flagging as rec nonetheless.
The questioner has 1-year-old account on SO, and a tumbleweed badge. (benefit of the doubt)
(Also flagged as rec anyway)
08:53
Ah. I forgot other accounts. =)
Thanks for the reminder.
0
Q: Documentation on the personalized prediction data

Patrick HofmanThe new Personalized Predication Data seems very nice to show relevant content, and the ability to download the data is excellent. It gives a feeling of trust. However, the downloaded data doesn't make any sense without documentation. Can there be a link to a page explaining what the figures mean?

Did you ever see that?
I think some of us have, when there was a blog entry about Stack Overflow Careers (quite recent)
Will Cole on January 27, 2015

Stack Overflow Careers was announced five years ago with a simple mission statement:

We believe that every professional programmer should have a job they love

To help you find a job you love, we need to match you with the right job at the right time. We do that by helping you create a profile that brings the right employers to you, and by showing you relevant job ads from our job board on Stack Overflow. With over 6,000 companies that advertise on Stack Overflow Careers, we’re getting closer to our goal of having a great job for every developer. …

Though there is no documentation on that data.
09:16
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive answer detected: Who shovels shit in full communism? by user3082 on politics.stackexchange.com
@SmokeDetector fp
@JanDvorak Registered answer as false positive.
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Effective way to Build Muscle by Betty Hollis on meta.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Effective way to Build Muscle by Betty Hollis on drupal.stackexchange.com
Holy Bettis!
@SmokeDetector tpu
@InfiniteRecursion Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
09:27
@SmokeDetector tpu
@InfiniteRecursion Blacklisted user and registered question as true positive: added title to the Bayesian doctype 'bad'.
Hiya @InfiniteRecursion o/
Hiya @InfiniteRecursion o/
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in body: How to move from one class to another in kivy by Vishal Parmar on stackoverflow.com
@Bart Hiya \o
@JanDvorak Hiya \o
It's kinda annoying I have two instances of SketchUp in my start menu...
It's an easy fix, but does Linux do something to prevent this?
... or to make them easier to distinguish?
09:55
@Bart deleted
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive answer detected: Who shovels shit in full communism? by Daniel on politics.stackexchange.com
... another one?
-1
A: Help us test the shiny new "User Activity" page! (Plus a bunch of new features.)

ThomasIs it possible to add a "Chat" to the User Button to the profile page?

Agree this is a bad idea?
Is this NAA?
-3
A: Help us test the shiny new "User Activity" page! (Plus a bunch of new features.)

Archangel33With these new activity page updates this got me thinking about what features this page is lacking. While the idea relates to this I'm unsure if it really belongs here so I created a new Feature Request here. I Feel this would be a nice addition to these tabs if not now or this release but in t...

@Pham gone
Since a while there is a proposal on Area51 which only needs 1 upvote more on 2 questions to get into commitment. Anyone care to upvote: area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65287/…
About the bots, can anyone provide feedback to that or only designated users?
@Pham gone
Sam
Sam
10:26
@Qantas94Heavy Both Smokey and Pham require the user to be "registered" to access most commands ("minor" commands don't).
ok, that would make sense
Sam
Sam
>>add-user 220428
@Sam User added!
haha, thanks
Sam
Sam
np
@Pham gone
10:29
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Effective way to Build Muscle by Betty Hollis on webmasters.stackexchange.com
Low Quality Q?: I want to convert date format, by Ajay Shinde, on stackoverflow.com.
@PatrickHofman nice
It's only one sentence. It must be unclear.
10:46
http://stackoverflow.com/users/4600662/ashish-kumar
http://stackoverflow.com/users/4314558/ashish-kumar
this user is hilarious
Bypassing quality restrictions?
Sam
Sam
LOL
please somebody get rid this QUESTION ASAP please help me out — Randyka Yudhistira 12 mins ago
> If you don't understand sarcasm, you should at least understand the language you are paid for
too rude?
Sam
Sam
Link/context?
Probably talking about the same question as the comment you linked to
10:51
Randyka Yudhistira please help me out — Ashish Kumar 12 mins ago
Sam
Sam
Oh, right.
@JanDvorak unnecessary
@SmokeDetector gone
@Pham gone
@Bart true...
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in body: Using Powershell to check Checkboxes in IE11 by Visar Baci on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: How We Reduce Wrinkles Faster by elizabeth jarmon15 on meta.stackexchange.com
11:07
Wait ... we have another owl in the room now ... ?
@SmokeDetector gone
whooo is that?
Xan, Bern, Switzerland
101 1
Gone again
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Skin CAre VAron by ferry lorry on meta.stackexchange.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive body detected: Make differents in indexof function (java) by xsus on stackoverflow.com
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword in title: Is Exposed Skin Care the Ultimate Acne Cure? by Imalk Gbeefrow on meta.stackexchange.com
Yay, I have 2015 profile views on SO! Btw, how the heck did I get so many views???
@nicael we're watching you ...
Does anyone notice that youtube video oneboxes now comes with a gray box of its title?
? example?
11:36
There, it says "Dramatic Hamster".
For some weird reason.
It's... dramatic!
Myeah, indeed. Not sure if that's an improvement
Thought on this?
0
A: Help us test the shiny new "User Activity" page! (Plus a bunch of new features.)

Andrew T.The new "Badges" section is colorful and I like it, but is there a reason why there is no background color and border if there is no badges for particular rank? Aside of that, I personally prefer "0" or "-" (dash) instead of "—" (notice the length) when there is no badge. I thought that as horiz...

11:51
@SmokeDetector gone
Anyone care to upvote the last question on this proposal: area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65287/… to get into commitment?
But it sucks.
@juergend The point about voting on Area 51 is to have 40 high quality questions, randomly voting on an arbitrary question just to throw it into the commitment phase wouldn't do any good.
Close vote retracted. But please do be nice. — Mooseman 7 secs ago
@SmokeDetector fp
@Mooseman Registered question as false positive and added title to Bayesian doctype 'good'.
12:06
@Mooseman I don't get it, how is "for your highness" not nice?
@Unihedro It's snippy. Would it not be taken that way outside of the states?
@bummi gone
0
Q: My failed audit shows another user

MoosemanI got a review ban when my mouse lagged. This is what I'm seeing now: Looks normal. However, when I visit the review page, I see this: For that very review I'm seeing another user listed who passed the audit.

12:18
@Mooseman Name is public to everyone I believe
@KevinBrown that's not the point
@KevinBrown It's part of 10k tools if I'm not mistaken, IIRC audits are an exception though.
@SmokeDetector delete dup
12:44
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive answer detected: Who shovels shit in full communism? by Daniel on politics.stackexchange.com
@SmokeDetector ignore
@Doorknob Post ignored; alerts about it will no longer be posted.
@InfiniteRecursion Did you have fun? :)
@Pham gone
13:34
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: PASCAL ROMAN TO ARAB CONVERSION by Anon on codereview.stackexchange.com
@SmokeDetector Off topic, asking for advice on code not yet written
Is this spam or just NAA superuser.com/a/881926/172747
@bummi I guess I'd give them the benefit of the doubt and go NAA.
@LynnCrumbling I did too, but have the feeling spam would have been correct
13:44
Question for the group. If I had a paragraph that I had reworded and wanted to see if anyone in the group agreed with my paraphrasing, where would be the best place to post that? Would that be a question for the group? Or is this the wrong place?
@randomblink sure.. you could dump it onto pastebin ..
I'm doubting my multiple clauses rendering and didn't want to spam the Question window if that was considered spam.
.. and give us the pastebin link.
Here is a link to my Google Docs straight to the bookmark.
eww login-wall
13:47
If you're below 2k, just suggesting an edit might be an option too
lol
Sorry, I just opened the link to make it public.
@LynnCrumbling then login
@JanDvorak blech.
lol... why the blech?
what's the original version?
13:48
So.. what are we looking at here?
Article 11 of the Treaty of Tripoli
The initial paragraph is As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.
My paraphrasing is
The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion. The government of the United States of America has, in itself, no character of enmite against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen. The government of the United States of America has never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation. Therefore it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religion opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.
@randomblink eh, just had to go through some extra sanity checks in my head... it sorta-kinda throws up alarms when someone sends me a link that immediately says "hey!!! type in your google password!!"
lol... ah and I dont see what you see
Sorry bout that
@LynnCrumbling It's a Google document
@JanDvorak I know... but I still had to examine the url and make sure everything looked kosher.
13:50
Totally understood... sorry
I'm a BIG Google Docs user...
@randomblink Just laziness on my part.
Laziness is the grandfather of efficiency...
I.. don't know if Writers is the correct site, it might be too opinion-based for this case though.
The rewording seems legit but unneccesary to me.
See, and that's where I was confused.
13:51
Maybe you can go to their chatroom.
I am "technically" just wanting to know if my paraphrase was right or if I goofed.
I'm not looking (at least not from this group) for opinions on the content, just the grammatical structuring of my paraphrase and whether or not my paraphrase was correct.
That's why I thought this would be the group.
@randomblink In your rewording, I would have thought you would have attempted to replace words like enmite, pretext, etc. In it's current form, it seems as if you're just shifting around sentence structure, but not really re-wording it.
I am trying to distill the meanings.
Someone has made the argument that the first sentence is part of a greater context that dismisses the meaning completely. My counterargument includes the hypothesis that if you take that paragraph and break it down from it's multiple clause arrangement, then you are left with a clear understanding of the meaning of EACH clause.
@randomblink The folks at meta chat are generally here to discuss topics surrounding overall StackExchange network-related questions and issues. Asking about "how to ask" a question is entirely on-topic in here.. paraphrasing content is subjective to some extent.. since it seeks to clarify.
Hmmmm
See, and what I was trying to avoid was posting this as a "question" and get it downgraded.
13:59
I'm not a native speaker, but the repetition of "The government of the United States of America" irks me.
I didn't know where I would be able to ask the kind of question I had.
See, and this is technically a translation from Arabic.
That's why I suggest you to go to their (writers.se) chatroom and ask this there.
Hey @bjb568 you taken the english PARCC tests yet?
00:00 - 14:0014:00 - 00:00

« first day (1665 days earlier)      last day (3584 days later) »