« first day (1442 days earlier)      last day (3806 days later) » 
00:00 - 12:0012:00 - 00:00

00:01
high in fibre?
user163250
This user is not the least bit sketchy at all, no siree...
user163250
@Cupcake why did you do that?
user163250
Do what?
00:05
@Cupcake post the picture of cleavage
user163250
I posted a link to a user profile, the cleavage just happened to come with it.
@Cupcake did you think that others needed to see it?
you could have described it without inflicting the visual on us
now forever and a day, i will see that image
@Cupcake do you deny, that you knew the cleavage was there?
user163250
I knew the cleavage was there.
user163250
Am I on trial?
@Cupcake so you admit it
user163250
00:08
Uh...guilty?
@Cupcake you exposed us to cleavage
@Cupcake no
Who were you talking to?
user163250
Who are you talking to?
2
You
user163250
00:16
Oh.
user163250
Alex?
yes?
@Cupcake wuz up g?
user163250
@Alex nothing but a lot of confusion.
@Cupcake how come?
Ooooooooooh... I had Alex muted.
00:25
@bjb568 who is Alex?
...and that's why. Remuted.
@bjb568 are you talking to me?
user163250
@Alex I think it has something to do with this shady character...
user163250
user163250
That guy.
user163250
00:30
I don't trust him.
user163250
Not one bit.
user163250
He's too cute to be trusted.
user163250
One moment you get this:
user163250
user163250
The next moment, you get this:
user163250
00:32
back to the wall
i am experienced in these things
but i treat each person as though they were completely new.
i strive to resist the temptation to prejudge and i am careful, but open to give someone a chance
:)
The apple is so small... like I can eat it.
...not that I eat apples.
00:48
...brown?
...brün?
...Bjorn?
41 messages deleted
Huh, much quieter.
Ignore works!
Yay!
2
Chat-suspended for 30 days.
01:04
Yay!
user163250
....
user163250
Wut?
user163250
What the hell did I miss?
user163250
I can see questions that I've cast delete votes on...
user163250
01:13
Is that new?
user163250
I can see deleted closed questions too...
user163250
I mean in my voting history.
@Cupcake Yeah, it's new.
Well, we always had the data, just never showed it before.
user163250
I thought it was a general policy to not make that kind of stuff easy to find.
user163250
I guess I must've missed a meta post about it somewhere, I'll go check...
user163250
01:20
Shot down again:
user163250
1
A: Enable Optional Anonymous Reasons for Downvotes on Questions

Shog9I'm pretty negative about this whole idea because of the opportunity for abuse. Any time we have to put our elected moderator team as the sole barrier between someone and widespread, unchecked abuse, we put a bit more strain on a system that relies heavily on distributed moderation. But there's ...

user163250
Some of the regulars on MSO need to start getting dupe hammers for and so that they can very quickly and painlessly shut down future requests.
And you'll have the other set that believe no question is ever a duplicate
user163250
We can silence those people pretty easily on MSO too.
user163250
A few downvotes and delete votes and done.
02:25
@bjb568 who did that?
oh @alex did
Why can't I do anything after doing things that would get me banned? I don't know... No clues in the pile of (removed)...
user163250
@VotetoClose what's up with that?
user163250
Is that supposed to be Alex?
user163250
The user seems to have been removed.
02:37
@Cupcake Yeah. Somehow he's dissociated.
user163250
Um...is he like a troll or something?
user163250
Huh.
user163250
I've seen him pop his head into here a few times, but never seemed like a problem before.
Idiots:
(ah, too late, didn't onebox)
02:39
@Cupcake he's not a successful troll
What happened to anti-semetic-chat-message-detected? 10kers?
user163250
I guess.
in Lounge<C++> on Stack Overflow Chat, 2 mins ago, by Anna Lear
I'm deleting this. There's no action to be taken on the message (IMHO), and if you want to flag something in a browser, you should know better than right-click. Hover over a message, click the arrow on the left, and choose "flag for moderator". — Anna Lear ♦ 20 secs ago
Okey dokey then.
user163250
What did right-clicking do?
user163250
02:41
I don't get it.
user163250
Wait...
user163250
Yeah, what does right-clicking have anything to do with this?
I don't get how that explains deleting the question.
@Cupcake Complaint was that right-clicking and left-clicking message and user didn't work in bringing up the flag button.
It was just someone being an idiot.
user163250
I can see.
02:43
Didn't the ban have anything to do with it?
user163250
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
user163250
3
Q: Jon Skeet flagged low quality

Austin MullinsI guess it happens to the best of us: http://stackoverflow.com/review/low-quality-posts/5308506. Screenshot: That depends on what you mean by "represent". Do you just want round-tripping, or the decimal representation of the exact value? Does it have to be human readable, or could you ...

user163250
I wouldn't flag one of Jon Skeet's posts.
user163250
That's sacrilegious.
It was from good ol 2009 tho.
He wasn't as immortal then.
Anyway, goodnight.
03:05
Is there a What would Jon Skeet do or Who is Jon Skeet or any Jon Skeet wristband that I can purchase?
user163250
03:32
I'll never trust hotel wifi again:
user163250
65
Q: This JavaScript code is injected on my hotel Wi-Fi: should I be worried?

foodiddyWhile connected to my hotel Wi-Fi, visiting the URL http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js results in the following content being served: var ga_exists; if(!ga_exists) { ga_exists = 1; var is_responsive = false; var use_keywords = false; Date.prototype.addHours = function (h) { ...

@Cupcake wait, did you actually did?
-2
Q: Why we don't use modulas of power of 2 in division method for hash table?

user3835655please give the answer as early as possible.This is my first question on stackflow. As you can tell, I am new to learning algorithms and data structure.

"Misplaced argument matcher detected here:" where? — Braiam 25 secs ago
user163250
03:55
@Jamal such fail :P
user163250
It would be awesome if you edit that in your question. — Braiam 14 mins ago
user163250
Also fail :P
The title of that question... just... what the hell?
How did that survive for a year?
I have no idea.
At least it flushed out a spammer, bring attention to the title.
@animuson: Does something need to be done about a user posting excessive promotion answers?
http://stackoverflow.com/users/1956964/amit
@Jamal Two of them had already been auto-flagged for being duplicated. Taken care of.
user163250
05:51
@JanDvorak pew pew pew!
user163250
(>-_-)> PEW PEW ---------------------------
I've also managed to teach another guy how to handle spam
and pointed him to the tavern
user163250
I have to find a better pew pew kirby.
user163250
There's one holding a gun.
user163250
This will do:
user163250
05:54
( -_・) ︻デ═一 ▸ ▸ ▸ ▸ ▸ ▸
user163250
2
Q: Please undo all of the current [git] tag synonyms (and reject [github] synonyms)

CupcakeGit Synonyms There are currently 8 tag synonyms for the Git tag, along with a 9th suggested synonym. These synonyms should never have been created. They all represent different, individual, and distinct commands or tools for Git...they do not all mean "Git, the distributed version control system...

@Cupcake For added effect, put the spam link in front of the gun. :-)
user163250
user163250
@Jamal pew pew pew ( -_・) ︻デ═一 ▸ ▸ ▸ ▸ ▸ ▸ SPAM tex.stackexchange.com/questions/191669/…
@Cupcake What about aliases?
user163250
05:57
user163250
It's not currently a synonym: stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/git-alias
user163250
Nor should it be.
06:09
Lol apparently Facebook doesn't think animated pornography counts as "pornography" as they declined my report.
Just because the two characters having sex are drawings doesn't make it any less sexually explicit.
I'd say it's sexually implicit if it's just stick figures having sex ;-)
Too bad Facebook doesn't let you enter custom messages. I reported some of the actual content and the page again. If they decline them all I'll just forward it to some parenting organization with the subtext "Look what Facebook supports!"
user163250
^^^
user163250
That will get their attention.
user163250
Did they literally send you a message along the lines of "we don't consider this to be pornography"?
user163250
06:19
Or was it something along the lines of "this content does not violate our community standards"?
The standard message that says it doesn't violate standards.
But that implicitly means they don't consider it pornography since pornography is against their community standards.
user163250
Right.
oh wow that was a big one
user163250
@ShadowWizard hmmm? You ok?
@Cupcake yup, still on my feet :)
oh, actually sitting but you know what I mean :D
@JanDvorak fun fact
Why on earth would a spammer read the entire About page?
user163250
This guy self-answered his own question by using my answer before his question was closed as a duplicate:
user163250
1
A: git pull without checkout for merging remote branch

andreas.abelOk, according to the link provided by Rohit Jain, the solution is git fetch origin maint:maint git merge maint git push

user163250
Would a moderator delete it if I flagged it for attention?
@Cupcake no, why delete it? Looks like a simple summary of your answer, relevant to the question.
user163250
06:42
Ok.
can't beat bots! :D
user163250
pew pew pew ( -_・) ︻デ═一 ▸ ▸ ▸ ▸ ▸ ▸ SPAM
user163250
I need to find a better text gun.
user163250
06:45
pew pew pew ( -_・) ︻┳═一 ▸ ▸ ▸ ▸ ▸ ▸ SPAM
user163250
That's a little better.
Maybe just stop posting guns here?
user163250
Ok.
Without guns life would be so boring
I disagree
user163250
06:51
@JanDvorak Why? People will get back to killing each other with swords. And using shields, armor etc.
user163250
I voted as unclear, but "needs commands used and errors" is actually a better reason.
@ShadowWizard forbid those as well
@JanDvorak so people will get back to killing each other with stones, maces, fists. ;)
Just forbid killing ;-)
06:55
@JanDvorak it's already forbidden :P
Enforce it better
@JanDvorak how? if you can suggest a perfect way, you will get very famous and probably rich
God can do that
The problem is, people don't want his help
@JanDvorak I'm pretty sure that if God would appear in front of someone right before he's killed and suggest to save him, he would happily agree and take any help God can provide.
But so far, don't think we have such a case in human history :D
There are a few cases where people accepted such help even without having to see God in person (which is, in fact, impossible)
07:05
Error: exceeded daily limit of God discussions
The mere existence of such a limit, I believe, kinda proves my point that people do not want God's help ;-)
@JanDvorak yup, glad I could help you prove your point :-D
Only robots should be able to use guns, military robots
@VotetoClose then you give full authority to those who can create robots
instead of sending men and young men to war to fight.. why not just send robots, and the country that loses most their robots first lose
07:13
I'd prefer not having anyone fight
@animuson wait a sec, you contacted FB support and expected a solution to the issue you arose?
07:27
Morning!
asubuhi!
Yo @ShadowWizard
@oxinabox yeah, saw only now and will reply in comment.
fair enough, if we need extended discussion, know I am here.
yup, good to know :)
Good thing about comments, they can be removed without leaving a trace
07:34
@VotetoClose gesundheit...
Henshin a go-go!
By the power of the SP-Watch, SharePointiful Joe is here
@rene בוקר טוב
@SPArchaeologist congrats!
Ok can you explain what you mean about the bolding?
I feel that Putting it in a Quote, and making the whole thing bold, and putting the Quote with in the Quote box in quatation makes is, not so great
^quotation marks
@oxinabox it's all in bold since it's a "bottom line", the summary of the answer, so removing part of the bold does not seem right, quote or no quote.
@oxinabox maybe, but it does work by emphasizing the text
@oxinabox you can edit chat messages :)
for 5 minutes
07:45
right
and it gets confusing
I feel that making either the quote text (the bit in the quote makes), or the quote source, removed the over emphising and improves a readability.
As it would make it look like we were highlighting Jeffs name over his logic by bolding only that.
Thus removing the bolding on that.

I feel the Summery is highlighted by the vary fact it in in a summery section at the top.
Strong bolding of the whole section is, well an arms race that will only end up with everying bold, and italic and underlined and in windings
Now my views are expressed.
@oxinabox maybe, you can put the name in italics to have it different if you like. Anyway, I won't roll back if it's only that bold part, the extra bullet point and the dash characters were my main motive
That is the arms race i was talking about
I think the dash characters were me failing to break dot points correctly (I should have checked with a preview, my bad_
@oxinabox what dot points? You mean ":" character?
I wanted to make all the unsupported versions, their own subdot points, becuase it was a list i felt was too long
07:49
it's totally valid, no need to break it
(I like dot points... perhaps too much)
oh, you mean bullet points of the list
Yes dot points == bullet points.
Anyway I agree the formatting can be improved, but please don't break "Internet" and "Explorer" into two different items, and no dashes out of the blue. :)
Internets Explorer
07:58
@rene eeeek
Ahh, and now i know why this wasn
^wan't done in the first place
MArkdown does not support deeply nested lists
user163250
Perhaps there SHOULD be a subforum of some kind for broader questions, for discussion questions, or even for very narrow questions (less useful than broad or discussion questions). If there already exists one of this type, then maybe rather than just closing a topic, it should be moved to this place, and the link placed in the original topic? So that way somebody google searching it could find the information they need, and also be informed where they should post similar issues? — user3450598 4 mins ago
user163250
Doesn't that sound like Programmers, in the early days before they cracked down on it and brought quality standards to it too?
There is. It is called the rest of the internet and it is crap
@oxinabox yes it does, you need a space after the "-" to make it into a list item.
Feel free to experiment in the Formatting Sandbox, or using a Preview
08:06
@Cupcake yeah, that users needs a forum, quora.com or chat...
I have a space after (this time) I think it only supports 1 level of nesting,
0
A: Formatting Sandbox

Shadow WizardI have three animals: Dogs Rex Joe Pit Cats Milky Snowy Ollie

That is only one level of nesting
Three levels now
it's all about the spaces
Dogs --> Rex --> Brown are three levels
see now
5 spaces = one more nesting level
Yes but the top level is <ol>
Have alook at the edit it made and see that it doesn't seem to have another layer
08:12
I edited your edit
Ahh 5 spaces
and the fun part, I had no idea either until now :D
I thought it was ~1 space per level.
Thanks
it's all about trial and error
ok, I have done my bullet pointing
I will defer to the judgement of others on the escalation of emphasis.
Thank you for your assistance
@oxinabox much better, cheers!
@VotetoClose 50 repz? pfft
:D
bye all
@ShadowWizard Yea, so the next bounty I offer on it can be 100 instead of 200, thinking in advance
@JanDvorak it's old, deleted hour ago
@VotetoClose good, you are clever ;)
@ShadowWizard failed copy/paste; sorry
wow Jordan Shoes attack
@JanDvorak apology... accepted :D
Looks like baba got an heir
stop spamming spam links
@VotetoClose you sure I should?
@VotetoClose it help removing spam faster
user163250
I'm trying to find the Meta Stack Exchange post that gives the huge explanation about why the initial incarnation of Programmers was such a huge failure, does anyone remember where that was?
08:21
you can Ignore Mr. Dvorak if you don't want to take part
user163250
I tried searching for "subjective questions" and stuff like that, but I'm still having trouble finding it.
@ShadowWizard naw, i just kidding
ohhh, got me!
@VotetoClose you scared me for a while
@Cupcake I remember reading it... let's see...
user163250
08:24
@ShadowWizard sometimes the "creative" titles on Meta make it really hard to find content :P
user163250
Case in point:
user163250
35
Q: No one likes quitting cold turkey

Travis JThe ban process is very useful to preventing low quality posts - for the most part. One very large glaring issue with it is that users can bypass it at will by using a different account. On a daily basis users hit the ban, and then either bypass it or take to meta to figure out why it happened a...

user163250
You wouldn't be able to tell from the title that that actually talks about the new anti-recidivism / question ban system.
user163250
@VotetoClose close, but not quite.
user163250
08:25
The post I'm thinking of actually had a graph in it.
user163250
Showing site traffic over time.
user163250
Shoot, I have to go back and bake in the oven, I'll keep looking later.
Happy baking.
user163250
Cupcake, AWAAAAAAAY!
08:30
@Bart without context that is rude....
@rene Any reply I have in my head would only make things worse, so I'm walking away from this one.
@rene baking? rude? how?
 
1 hour later…
user202362
09:57
@TimPost locked your cat indoors yet, I heard there's another typhoon coming your way ...
user202362
or maybe you don't have a cat ...
10:11
Tim has lolcat as a pet
10:33
00:00 - 12:0012:00 - 00:00

« first day (1442 days earlier)      last day (3806 days later) »