« first day (1389 days earlier)      last day (3632 days later) » 

12:01 AM
@ColeJohnson I don't see the issue with the failed audit question.
 
@Louis too broad
 
@ColeJohnson Ok, I can see that.
 
 
2 hours later…
1:43 AM
at what point the nofollow attribute gets removed for users?
 
2:10 AM
44
A: Remove nofollow on links at a certain age

Robert Cartaino URGENT UPDATE We were seeing a significant drop in Google (organic) traffic for Server Fault after instituting this "follow links if enough upvotes post-edit or post-create" policy. We traced it back to what we currently think are a string of posts on Server Fault that got nofollow ...

That's the best I could do, since @TimStone didn't respond to the Tim-Signal.
 
2:37 AM
-13
A: Can we not rel=nofollow links in profile About Me for users with 3000+ rep?

Jeff AtwoodWhy would we allow this? We already give users the benefit of a non-nofollow link in their profile (when they achieve 2k reputation), extending it to "About Me" would open up a world of potential linkspam exploits.

the exact criteria for removing nofollow in posts is secret, to prevent abuse. The philosophy behind the criteria are fairly simple though: the community has to indicate that they trust both the user and the current state of the post to a certain degree.
 
@Shog9 you gave too many hints...
 
meh
 
3:11 AM
GREETINGS COMRADES
Any ThinkPad or Lenovo users?
Sign up^ Let's fight this stupid miniPCI-E whitelist rouse for vendor lock-in change.org/petitions/…
 
I'm disappointed with myself. I tried the Periodic Table quiz on Sporcle and could only think up 53 of the elements... hangs head in shame
 
@animuson if it makes you feel better, I could probably only guess like 3-4. However, if the quiz shows you the abbreviation of the elements, then i could probably do like 20.
 
@Stilly.stack The one I took doesn't. I kept trying to visualize it with all the labels in my head.
 
Link?
 
 
2 hours later…
Mat
Nothing like the smell of fresh spam in the morning...
 
one of them actually went undetected by my filter
then there's one that was suspicious to me but could be potentially legit.
 
Mat
5:27 AM
Just a random resource recommendation Q.
 
6:57 AM
All gone :)
 
I feel like you're just trying to make me sign up for a bunch of sites… :P
 
@bjb568 please do :-)
Wow. Phone number twice in the title. These spammers are getting really desperate.
 
Marriage problem?
We rank high even for spam!
 
@JanDvorak It's deleted.
Well, I'm trusting google with it…
Shouldn't posting questions be rate-limited to like 1 per half hour?
 
@bjb568 not if you have multiple accounts
 
It'd still prevent some low-quality and spam posts.
Just one left now…
 
7:24 AM
most of the spam is actually caught by the server
 
Doesn't stop help vamps on SO.
 
I flagged the ones that were still up...
Morning!
 
Morning!
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Phone number detected: Free HUSBAND+918295003531 WIFE DISPUTE PROBLEM SOLUTION BY molvi ji on english.stackexchange.com
 
Night.
What's the bot do?
 
7:25 AM
@rene it was a smart move dispatching the morning train right now.
 
:)
 
@bjb568 it is hooked up to the real-time question websocket and has a regex to match content, if a match is found is posts in a chatroom...
 
Smart.
More spammers need to read this:
user image
3
 
That was part of the spam proposal on Area 51?
 
7:29 AM
113
Q: We need to improve the quality of our spam!

UndoRecently, I've noticed a downhill effect in the quality of spam posted on Stack Exchange websites. Take this as an example (found on Space.SE): There are a great many things wrong with this artifact: There is not one capitalized letter in the entire post. (-1 grammar point.) The only pun...

 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword detected,Phone number detected: sotan se chutkara +918295003531 All vashikaran spcialist molvi ji on english.stackexchange.com
 
I particularly like this one:
4
A: We need to improve the quality of our spam!

ikeAll seriousness aside, to improve the quality of our spam, we should fight back with the same tools that they use. What this means is that when a post is marked as spam, the poster's personal email address should be placed instead of his posting with a message that says : Send all your hate mail ...

 
@bjb568 Ah that post had as a spin off the area51 proposal...
 
COME ON COME ON COME ON! How much longer till community deletes the account?
Spam badges proposal:
 
Some accounts tend to exist a long time...
 
7:39 AM
@ManishBot Y U NO detect dis?
 
Yay. I didn't have to create an account to flag that.
It might work to instantly hellban new users who post a phone number…
 
Can I have some close votes here quickly : stackoverflow.com/questions/23842490/…
 
@bjb568 some do so in good faith
@rene only if you tag your comment
 
@JanDvorak But do we really need them? :P
 
Your wish is my command @JanDvorak
 
7:51 AM
Webmaster spam account deleted.
 
8:14 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: PRIMEFACES CAPTCHA WITH WIZARD on stackoverflow.com
 
8:49 AM
Wow!
The query processor ran out of internal resources and could not produce a query plan. This is a rare event and only expected for extremely complex queries or queries that reference a very large number of tables or partitions. Please simplify the query. If you believe you have received this message in error, contact Customer Support Services for more information.
How hard can this be: select postid as [Post Link] from votes where votetypeid in (8,9)
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword detected: master of vashikaran specialist baba +91 9950211818 on english.stackexchange.com
 
Hmmm [Post Link] kills it...
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword detected: vashikaran specialist astrologer +91 9950211818 on english.stackexchange.com
 
GC is a diet now? Never knew Garbage Collection was that powerful.
 
10:51 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword detected: Freedom for all problms contect baba ji +91-9001992787 on english.stackexchange.com
 
wave of spam?
 
11:57 AM
Actually, I'd say load in catapult and fire away!
 
... they are different versions of the same script. Why should they work together?
 
I assume the last one loaded wins? Based on the line window.Modernizr =... that is...
 
Myeah. Guess he has two things relying on different versions of modernizr?
 
That IS the prolem...the OP doesn't know that yet...
If we solve the loading of just a single version the OP runs into the next problem...
 
@Bart I don't know Modernzr well enough (and I'm not going to reverse engineer minified code) but you can, for instance, get jQuery 1.11.0 and jQuery 2.whatever to both be loaded on the same page and work.
 
12:19 PM
@Louis that is true but in the shown code snippets non of the steps to make something like that work has been done...
 
@rene I don't think anyone is disputing that the question does not make it clear that this is even a possibility in this case.
 
Agreed...
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword detected: GPS Watch - Nike+ SportWatch vs TomTom Multisport on fitness.stackexchange.com
 
@ManishBot not spam, but depending on fitness' policies, this could be POB
 
hi, what is wrong about my answer why it deserved an unexplained downvote? stackoverflow.com/questions/23844867/…
 
EEEEEK!! I'm seeing ghosts!! ^^^^
 
Mat
1:02 PM
@LaszloPapp: your trick doesn't really work in a headless environment. QApplication requires an X11 connection on Linux (at least in Qt4). I guess that might be a reason for a downvote. Or it could just be one of your admirers saying hi.
 
@Mat: nope, it does not, it is up to the platform plugins which could be even fb.
OK, next, what is wrong about this answer that it got an unexplained downvote? stackoverflow.com/questions/23840550/…
next, what is wrong about this one? stackoverflow.com/questions/23840550/…
next, what is wrong about this one? stackoverflow.com/questions/23726557/…
 
Pff really? We're now supposed to explain all the downvotes you've gotten?
 
OP deletes question just after I've edited it... why the @#%@#$ do I bother?
 
1:08 PM
@LaszloPapp stop it please.
 
@Louis: I would vote on undelete assuming you only edit reasonable questions.
 
(Bonus: OP probably thinks I've downvoted him/her because there was a downvote coincidental with my edit.)
 
@SPArchaeologist: ^^
 
@LaszloPapp This is at the level of "annoying" rather than "outrageous". If it were "outrageous", I'd certainly cast a vote.
And the question might still get downvotes just due to subject matter and the fact that it is a Meta question.
I don't want to subject the OP to this.
 
@Louis: ok, well, I only edit questions whose goal is worthy and should not be deleted.
 
Mat
Yay, my favorite!
 
It's the only exercise I get!
 
But what sport is UFC 173?
Suppose it is bowling but I only realize that after I payed to view...
 
Unicorn Fight Club
 
1:55 PM
\o
 
o/
 
\o/
 
2:08 PM
Should I flag this answer "low quality because of content problems" stackoverflow.com/a/23845317/1741671 or simply downvote or vote to delete it ?
 
2:41 PM
 
2:54 PM
I think I'm correct...
If this is about unity3d the tag is wrong... — rene 36 secs ago
 
Yep @rene. In which case the accepted answer is also unrelated. :D
The OP should really clarify that
 
 
2 hours later…
4:40 PM
they are get ting des perate
 
Do they have any clue they're not only fighting spam filters but users as well?
 
probably
the automated filters act immediately
humans act within seconds to hours.
 
Why do you assume any specific amount of intelligence or programming ability of the voters? Also note that votes rate answers, not answerers. — Jan Dvorak 35 secs ago
 
 
1 hour later…
6:06 PM
Does anyone know if there is any swear word filter in place that puts posts containing them into the VLQ queue?
 
Not that I know....
Do you get a lot of those?
 
Now of course that could have been a simple typo. Happens all the time ...
 
Keyboard La Tourette?
 
You buy one of those keyboards that has "fallen off the back of a truck" in da hood, and it turns out to have these awkward hotkey combinations. Been there, done that.
And I mean, the OP is this innocent looking girl who I would certainly not suspect of such filth.
 
 
1 hour later…
7:53 PM
@JanDvorak closed
 
@TGMCians thanks
 
8:09 PM
what to do with this question? stackoverflow.com/questions/11901143/…
 
too broad I would say
 
duplicate
 
@TGMCians based on the expired vote?
that's... actually a legitimate argument
 
yup
 
thanks.
 
8:13 PM
now leaving time, cya
 
bye
 
bye
 
cya
 
8:28 PM
Hiya @Doorknob. Have not seen you in a while?
 
Hey @Bart! (yes, I haven't been in here for a while)
 
Don't tell me you actually have a life. :p
 
No, of course not. That would be... weird and disturbing.
 
Phew
 
:P I've just not really talked here for a while; more in TL and PPCG's chat instead for some reason
 
8:32 PM
Oh sure, give the guy a shiny diamond and he forgets all about us common folk
 
lol
 
8:55 PM
Diamonds are a guy's best friends.
2
 
Any mod around? ^^^
This is the second instance today where this user has spouted hate speech. Just nuke that account
Pretty please?
 
... pings people
 
yeah, got them
 
9:58 PM
Yay! Spam system caught it!
 
Haha, I love how one user found this "too minor" stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/4896903
 
10:56 PM
@Bart You got your wish.
 
Yep, I noticed. :)
 
11:07 PM
Well, I'm banned again.
 
@GnomeSlice Where?
Chat?
 
chat.se
 
Banned? Or suspended?
 
Suspended.
I posted porn.
 
me goes to look
 
11:08 PM
because people kept asking about a comment I made
I labelled it nsfw but I guess that wasn't good enough.
Anyway, what's going on on meta?
@Bart @hichris123 did you catch today's listening?
 
Myeah, posting porn will get you banned @GnomeSlice. rofl
I did get the listening though, yep. :)
 
Didn't get this guy banned.
 
@GnomeSlice Message linky? All I see is oneboxed quotes from people.
@GnomeSlice Nope.
 
I don't see why posted something nsfw and labelling it as such is okay for some things and not others. nsfw is nsfw
 
@GnomeSlice but some nsfw is against the TOS content policy.
 
11:12 PM
yeah whatever
fine
 
@GnomeSlice ... you'll find that message is no longer there.
 
@hichris123 Well, what do you know.
It was there a minute ago.
 
Yeah, porn is a no-no.
@GnomeSlice Yeah, I deleted it. :P
 
well whatever
 
I'm going to go out and eat, but just take a break.
Get a drink, listen to music, whatever.
Cya in a bit.
 
11:15 PM
I'm not fucking happy boys
 
user168476
@GnomeSlice Because really, you shouldn't be posting it, no one should.
 
user168476
And we are trying to get people to stop doing so.
 
@bjb568 That's... not spam. That's just off-topic.
 
It may be a payed idiot.
It has a link to a commercial site.
 
We'll see then @bjb568. Don't see a reason to flag this as spam just yet.
 
11:56 PM
Siiigh… Then delete vote or whatever.
 

« first day (1389 days earlier)      last day (3632 days later) »