@Shog9's description of how to use "unclear" and "too broad" is the opposite of how I intuitively think about it (if I'm understanding the explanation correctly, that is).
too broad: you're asking too much. Break it up. Maybe a lot. Unclear: not sure how much you're asking for, or necessarily even *what* you're asking for. EXPLAIN YOURSELF!
@jadarnel27 If you have yet to write your second function, asking how to write an order entry system is a bit much - that's too broad. here are some better examples.
Update 2013/03/06: I've been playing around in the Data Explorer (first time I've used it) and put together a basic query to help identify typo related posts a little better, improvements welcome:
http://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/edit/101573
select a.Id as [Post Link], a.Body
f...
Of course, implementing an order entry system is "too broad" for SO in general. But it sounds like your general guidance would be to err on the side of unclear (when it really is unclear what, specifically, the OP needs). Does that...sound about right @Shog9?
"Too broad" is usually blatantly obvious. People will straight-up ask, "how do I write <describe or name some application that already exists with thousands of man-hours behind it>"
The unclear ones are where someone posts a list of requirements, and you can't really tell if they're doing it for context or if they actually expect you to buckle down and start coding up an app that meets them.
It's probably too broad, but since they didn't even bother to ask a question... it's unclear.
I think I've got my head wrapped around this now, @Shog9. Thanks. I just enjoy using the close votes queue, and wanted to make sure I continue to use it...correctly.
Could someone please help me out to give a RE for subnet masking 255.255.255.255
I have added the text input in GWT and trying to create validation for that but I am not able to get one.
Please help.
Question is asked, it is unclear. Question is closed for being unclear. The OP reads the close reason (ha!) and clarifies their question, making it crystal clear that the question is too broad.
@hichris123 Sort of makes sense actually, but really the original poster should've linked to the post / comment or user (so we're not like "who in the world is 'Atigar'?"), but definitely too minor (anyway, question should be closed)
See the following question:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9545/who-in-the-software-world-do-you-admire-the-most
It was recently deleted, but it somehow looks like it was deleted by the same mod twice.
I just saw a post (deleted) Crop portion of string with PHP [closed] which was deleted by Gordon♦ but is shown as:
deleted by Charles, Gordon♦, Gordon♦ 1 min ago
How is it that one person (whether a mod or not) can vote twice on the same post?
hmm, I just faced this without any failure " Review You have failed too many recent review audits – looks like you might need a break. Come back in 7 days to continue reviewing."
Was I put on that explicitly for some non-audit bad review or what happened?
At least, I do not recall any failed audit. Perhaps I rejected too many suggested edits and there is some quota triggering a ban over a certain percentage? :D Strictly speaking, I have not even done suggested edit reviews today except one.
OK, never mind, I will contact the Stack Overflow Team.
@Undo I would say that close queue is the most complicated one - most thinking involved. Most other things it's just 'yes/no', or at least for LQ/etc. there are few of them at any one time. Close there are lots of, and you have to make multiple complicated decisions at one time.
Depends on what the question is. It's like if you're asking about how to set an automatically generated TOC in Word, it's going to be on Super User. But if it's about the underlying codebase that writes that generator, then it's on Stack Overflow. In both cases they'll be both asked on Stack Overflow because Google pointed them to the Ask Question page.