@RebeccaChernoff Free facebook fishing for following? FANTASTIC!
@romainl Oh, I can clarify that for you: someone got the bright idea of up-voting you many, many times in the space of about a minute. That looks pretty dodgy, so the system invalidated them. Since he's gone and done it again, you can pretty much expect the same outcome.
@Shog9 Thanks for your answer. Yes. That's what I'm expecting. What can you tell me about the perpetrator? While I agree voting fraud should be fought off, but there are chances that the person wanted to do good. How could I reach out to him/her and tell him/her to stop?
@romainl I can't really tell you anything, but I've contacted him and asked him to stop. The usual advice is, "vote on the content, not the user" - hopefully he'll take it to heart.
FWIW, you weren't the only target; I suspect he was, as you surmise, trying to do right by folks he felt were posting good stuff.
@Shog9 Thank you. here's hoping your message will be understood. Thanks again. Do you mind if I upvote many of your posts as a reward for your help? ;-)
@jcolebrand I don't have much of an issue with the research methods on that gravatar question - content analysis is a well defined qualitative research method that can be a valuable tool in mixed methods research for example. The caveat is that you have to have a sensible coding system and apply it robustly of course.
@Sathya and @slhck: Still can't get into the SU chat, or else I would tell you there, but thank you again for attacking my account merge; it's fixed now.
The only time I've found that to be true is when it takes more than a few seconds to get the text message from Google. Thankfully that usually doesn't happen.
@TimStone at a minimum, 12 hours, 42 seconds. Assuming you're reading ALL the data, and processing it according to some random loops. Optimize the loops ...
We in the C# chat room are having an issue with people abusing stars. When someone starts spam-starring messages, we cancel the stars, but this gives the user their stars back, enabling them to spam us with more stars.
I think that stars should not be gotten back, so that someone who spams with ...
@RebeccaChernoff if anyone couldn't tell my jokes from my statements of the truth, well, good. It'll imbue them with a sense of "let me double check before I do something stupid" which we all know is a lesson I haven't quite learnt yet.
@Bart When you can find a flaw in my answers (marked accepted, upvoted beyond 4 total score) that is more than pedantic, then you can start to badmouth people.
After my success (or lack thereof) today trying to be informative, helpful and constructive, I feel I deserve to at least push one user to a ragequit. Please? ;)
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(jQuery.fn).sort().filter(function(n) {
return typeof jQuery.fn[n] === "function"
}).map(function(n) {
return "[" + n + "](http://api.jquery.com/" + n + ")"
}).join(",\n")
Gives:
add,
addClass,
after,
ajaxComplete,
ajaxError,
ajaxSend,
ajaxStart,
ajaxStop,
aj...
