I asked what made it offensive because I was genuinely curious (hence why I had to write a question on another site to get some information about it).
I didn't mean to sound argumentative.
@JourneymanGeek Well, if I hadn't asked, I would still be under the impression that the term you objected to was "butt" (which would have ended badly for me lol)
Sure - but do you want to be the guy people waste time on explaining things fruitlessly? And if I'm using that term to explain what it is, in detail....
I'd appreciate it if you'd be a little more blunt with me. Like if I'm saying something wrong, I'd be happy if you could say "please don't say X because it has connotations Y".
That would help me greatly. Or to allow me to ask you privately for clarification, for example.
I've read that, but wiktionary and the like don't consider it a curse or swear. I've never even thought of it that way. I didn't know that you (or anyone) did.
I've thought about this for a while - and perhaps its worth reframing the question in terms of what sort of information we need, and how this information is best stored, and shared in a way that meets both privacy, and the operational requirements of both mods and the folks who run the site.
TLDR...
I ran a website where I implemented this for moderators.
So I know how it can be done effectively and the upsides and downsides.
(tl;dr is use 32-bit block cipher or equivalent with secret key stored by the server, if I recall)
Well, 32-bit for IPv4, at least. My site didn't support IPv6.
Though I tend to doubt that the limited level of interaction most trolls have with SE would make stylometry particularly effective, except for cases with the most extreme idiosyncratic tells.
Attention? On a small chat with half a dozen active people?
Nah that's not the heart of the troll.
(Actually here about 80% of things I get suspended for aren't trolling and are mostly your misunderstandings of English. And 20% are me pushing buttons.)
Nah. I'm not the one who thinks that the word "hypocrite" is synonymous with the word "lying". Remember the time you kicked me because you misunderstood those terms?
That was... like 2 years ago? Something like that. But I remember some of it.
@JourneymanGeek m8 you never saw the old me
Back when I was younger and had so much more time on my hands. Back then everything was me.
(beleted so they don't actually find me lel)
(Which reminds me. If anyone comes in here calling me by a name that starts with an "e" and claims they're my mother, just ignore them. If you engage they will start spamming gore for months.)
I like knowing what other people want. You like people doing what you tell them.
(But the fact that you didn't insta-ban me for bringing up that previous misunderstanding you had does inspire some confidence that we may one day be able to get along)
Although the fact that I changed "a little" to "some" because I didn't want you to think I meant "little" and kick me for saying that I have little confidence in you, doesn't. :D
At least it's sparking the linguist in me. That's a subject I really want to get back into.
Random fact of the day: Some people try to claim that the Finno-Ugric language family is related to the Japonic family. Those people are, of course, idiots.
Another fun fact of the day: "Finno-Ugric" is really fun to say.
But I wonder if it'd annoy them, or make them think I'm ignorant (analogously to how anonymity researchers think of people who say "TOR" instead of "Tor", despite it also annoying them).
@JourneymanGeek I mean... everyone who distrusts SE. All over meta people talk about how SE has screwed them or how SE staff are doing damage. Never SO staff.
Let's make it simple by renaming the company to Exchange Overflow.
Or more accurate, Confusion Overflow (TM).
I bet very few, even inside the company, really knows for sure what is the actual name, what is the trade mark name, etc. And even they got it wrong. lol
@MetaAndrewT. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. It shouldn't need to be said, but I do it now: Creating new rooms to circumvent restrictions in the old one, is like creating new accounts to avoid restrictions on an old one: NOT DONE.
G.N. Ramachandran et al, in their own work (PMC) (DOI), did not used phi(ϕ) and psi(ψ) as we use today. They used phi(ϕ) and phi-dash(ϕ') defined as follows:
The conventions we have adopted for the standard configuration ϕ = ϕ' = 0°) and for the positive sense of rotation for the two angular par...
I am crawling the web many years to get answer to this very very basic convention
user334271
but no answer anywhere
user334271
6:18 PM
Phi and Psi dihedral angles are alphabets of protein. They are as basic as that. Yet nobody wrote anywhere how the phi and psi dihedral angle is being counted. That is ridiculous.
user334271
Even countless softwares using phi and psi values, no mention of definition of zero-point for phi psi.
That poses a chicken-and-egg problem: you can't release a new build to an unsupported app to say so, since you also need to support the app at the same time. — Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog3 mins ago