« first day (3604 days earlier)      last day (1420 days later) » 

12:10 AM
Is there a chat bot to track tags that are recreated?
 
12:56 AM
 
 
5 hours later…
5:49 AM
eh, when did the bounty mechanism change to show the "can't award bounty" as tooltip and disable the link?
 
6:04 AM
@ShadowKeepsSocialDistance since I asked for it perhaps?
 
@Glorfindel huh! Saw the request, missed the completed update. :)
This also explains what caused this minor bug.... ;)
 
6:39 AM
43 messages moved to Chimney
@SonictheStay-HomeHedgehog yes, Burnaki has that. Not sure if that still runs because .. reasons.
@Catija for SEDE read-only is enough. After all that is what you gave me here as well ;) and you can, as Shog9 said, point SEDE at any SQL Server database. It will work. SEDE doesn't care what the database schema looks like. It has a few features that are bound to the names of tables but that is about it. Despite not being available by default I do feel it might be helpful to point out SEDE exists and will work for them if they support it themselves.
 
 
2 hours later…
8:24 AM
3 messages moved to Chimney
 
8:58 AM
22 messages moved to Chimney

 community-a-thon

A place for Community members to discuss the 2020 community-a-...
 
9:18 AM
flags everything there as spam :P
 
 
1 hour later…
10:22 AM
Did anything happen here: meta.stackexchange.com/q/349438/158100 that it got so badly received?
 
SO specific?
 
gimme-teh-SEDE-query?
 
Okay. Yeah. A bit of a shame that none of the linked questions answers the question asked, or it must for that one hint from peterh that SEDE is the solution.
 
@rene I kind of want to unclose it and respond to it just to make up for the poor reception
 
where you still have to workout your self what that one line query will be then.
@YaakovEllis well, I casted a re-open vote but it has also 2 delete votes so it will be a tight squeeze to have it survive. I did properly answer in a comment so I'm biased for having it re-opened. I let others judge. I was checking if I missed context, for example due to a ton of deleted comments from the OP (and others)
 
10:31 AM
Maybe it would be possible to edit it to not be SO specific?
 
then it would be incredibly broad
 
As a give me teh sede, wouldn't it be only mildly so?
 
and the OP self deleted so we can't actually know if they see it :/
 
@JohnDvorak done that, please check if that is okay.
 
hmm
@rene hmm. Maybe change it to "how do I find out" ?
 
10:39 AM
done
 
@JourneymanGeek The goal ever was not to primarily help the OP but anyone, no?
 
Sure but quick self account deletions are bad
 
11:01 AM
@rene took the liberty of reopening.
 
11:14 AM
@JourneymanGeek I'll promote my comment to an answer in 6 to 8 ...
 
Rob
11:58 AM
@Mithical The g is silent.
 
Huh?
 
Rob
I'll let someone else decipher the ingenious of the humor, @M.A.R. is always good at that. 🤞
Hint: Hugh?
 
12:59 PM
@Rob point?
@Rob Jackman!
But where did you hear @Mith speak??
Looks like one time glitch.... should we keep the user black listed? @Art what you think?
 
1:56 PM
Just installed Arctic Fox on XP.... it's working. proud
meh.... not a spammer or troll.
IMO better add to black list only after two confirmed spam posts, otherwise we'll be getting more and more false positives like this...
 
2:24 PM
meh
 
Are you OK? You didn't post what you always post.... ;)
 
I think we're going back in time. Weren't there often 'meh's before the toilets?
 
Aww. What's wrong? :)
 
@Tinkeringbell no, I don't hold my meh's
Finally, real spam..... :D
 
2:37 PM
By fire be purged, spammers.
 
Fire only makes spam more tasty, so bad idea.
 
2:50 PM
python @rene @Art @Mith @Sonic
 
3:07 PM
Darn snakes.
 
 
1 hour later…
Rob
4:30 PM
@ShadowKeepsSocialDistance That's Wombat spam, thus the square shape.
 
5:02 PM
Combat all the wombats.
 
@ShadowKeepsSocialDistance these wombats?
 
5:46 PM
@rene too curly
 
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
 
┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)
@Rob When I'm paying attention, that is. And I'm not paying attention right now
The recent homework barrage is tearing me apart
 
please try to keep your body in one piece just for a little bit @M.A.R., being torn apart helps no one
makes a big mess as well
and frankly i'm not sure my clean button will adequately take care of it
 
6:07 PM
@Mithical Thank you! If you hadn't told me, I might have not remembered to resist being torn apart
 
you're welcome glad to be of service
 
Mith for RO of the world
 
Rob
6:30 PM
@M.A.R. So I see:
 
My favorite is the dead rat
 
Rob
Weasel?
I've seen the first one dozens of times, the third one is an unusual handicap; while the fourth is just sad.
 
You are right that the skull shape doesn't match a rat
 
4th one might be a language barrier thing
maybe whoever printed it out couldn't read it
 
Rob
6:59 PM
I believe the fourth is when you upload your image to the online Stamp company and there's an error serving the image, so an error message comes up; the person apparently thought that the default error image was what the person wanted made into a stamp.
It's like these NSFW T-Shirts where there's a great failing in understanding how things work.
 
6
A: Under what circumstances will Stack Exchange, Inc. share private/sensitive information with the press?

Teresa DietrichWe care about the concerns of the community, written about here and in other places, and are committed to ensuring that there are no deviations from this policy in the future. Though we had internal policies on talking to the press in place before the events that led to this question being asked,...

 
'Tis not a bad response.
 
Also a not-so-bad usage of the policy lock.
 
7:20 PM
@Mithical Slightly random... do you know why the Community user on Judaism has the wrong icon?
 
...uh no I do not. I hadn't noticed that before.
 
Hmmm. Well, I fixed it. :D
 
Cool. Maybe one of the mods was experimenting something?
 
Possibly.
 
@Spevacus I hope there are no actually bad usages of policy locks
 
7:24 PM
@JourneymanGeek Assuming they're only used on policies (which, I mean... policy locks...) I imagine there won't be. I was just referring to that being a pretty good use for it, and the first time we're seeing it truly in action beyond its introduction.
 
Had to google sacrosanct
 
Bit of an archaic word but not a bad one.
 
certainly not. It is fine.
It matches the tone and importance of the overall message
 

« first day (3604 days earlier)      last day (1420 days later) »