« first day (3430 days earlier)      last day (1585 days later) » 

Rob
3:11 AM
@JourneymanGeek There's a CV OT on the Announcement, should it be cleared?
 
@Rob amusingly enough, there's no way to clear closevotes
Its kinda tempting to lock it again
 
Rob
K, I voted Leave Open. Can you / Should you try the queue?
One vote from you should be binding ...
 
3:26 AM
Oh lets give it a shot
Nope, not really much good
 
Rob
Hmmm. It's for "does not appear to seek input and discussion", though there is the discussion tag (and announcement). Need a new mandatory for just an announcement (if that's the protester's claim).
Odd your vote wasn't a decider.
 
4:14 AM
I've seen mods on various sites clear delete votes
 
Its a close vote
@Rob I'd consider it a protest closevote, and as a solitary vote, meh.
 
Rob
@JourneymanGeek Somewhere (the -2K Announcement?) there's a comment from a Mod/CM "quit trying to close this ...". --- Closing / Deleting a Company Announcement is R/A: "... abuse of the community or system ...".
They (we) don't have to like it, but people need to be able to access the information (without wondering if closed means it no longer applies - if they are new and don't know better). --- But I accept your decision, I've reported this, case closed.
 
4:29 AM
@Rob Despite popular belief, there's very few cases where I want to suspend someone, and a singular closevote is... meh
Unless OP was up to other skullduggery and we needed to Capone them :D
Also quite frankly that thread probably has mods checking it every so often so... its likely to not get closed, I hope
 
 
3 hours later…
7:25 AM
43 messages moved to Chimney
 
 
1 hour later…
8:30 AM
@M.A.R. that
@Mithrandir24601 because you know anything that @Mith knows! :D
@JourneymanGeek yes there is. Close and reopen.
 
@ShadowTheBurningWizard meh, if it gets closed, we can reopen
 
But only after 6-8 minutes/hours/days when someone notice, flag, etc.
 
That question/answer's active and busy enough to keep an eyes
 
Until then, it will stay closed.
@JourneymanGeek 99% of the people reading it will be happy to see it closed, so they won't try to reopen or flag.
 
@ShadowTheBurningWizard I'm doubtful over those statistics.
 
8:34 AM
I'm not. Maybe 99.9% then.
:D
Let's see the vote split...
126/652
hmm.... well maybe you're right this time. :/
about 20% agree with this.
 
so total number of votes is about 778
 
Holidays now, so thousands more will be cast in the next 6-8 weeks though.
 
83% downvotes
 
(if it will stay featured)
 
but that dosen't reflect how many people want it closed
Only a certain dissatisfaction with the eventual resolution, and that's entirely between Monica and SO IMO
 
8:36 AM
I'd say downvote means people won't mind seeing it closed/nuked.
 
meh
Time for....
!!/coffee Tink
 
@ShadowTheBurningWizard brews a cup of Cappuccino for @Tink
 
It could mean it didn't go far enough (like reinstatement)
 
stealing coffee from parrot
 
8:38 AM
At least a few might have felt it wasn't a rollback of everything they didn't like.
Statistics can sometimes mislead without context.
 
@JourneymanGeek for me it means I don't like the way it's phrased and the fact it was forced out by lawyers rather than being authentic.
 
@ShadowTheBurningWizard but that dosen't mean it dosen't belong on meta no?
 
Rob
Today has been very quiet, tomorrow too most likely; then the Boxing Day liner-uppers ... So it won't be busy for a few more days, then things will start to take off again. --- Also, I think that the regurgitator was stuck, because I was getting no votes all day and then received a pile all within a short period of time.
 
@JourneymanGeek it belongs, I didn't and won't vote to close. But I won't mind seeing it closed and won't try to reopen.
@Rob what.... are... you talking about? lol
 
@ShadowTheBurningWizard I think its important it stays -as what comes close to "What was said wasn't exactly how it should have been" as we will get
 
Rob
8:41 AM
Yes, lol
 
@Rob you'll end up taking @Hitodama's place. ;)
 
Rob
Or you @david's
 
@JourneymanGeek but it won't stay, it will be deleted by OP at some point anyway.
 
@ShadowTheBurningWizard hm.
 
(in the next update, likely)
 
8:42 AM
@ShadowTheBurningWizard the older posts could be seen as a mistake.
I get the idea that there's going to be no more updates.
 
And this one isn't??
 
@ShadowTheBurningWizard that is a very very wild guess
 
@user1306322 not guess... just reflecting personal opinion. :)
 
Rob
I think he shares his account, or someone uses it when he's out. Often great things to say othertimes not so much.
 
downvotes mean sooooo many different things in so many different cases it's basically useless to try and guess
@ShadowTheBurningWizard alright, but you didn't phrase it as such, so I read it as a generalization :p
 
8:44 AM
@Rob who? David A? Don't even know who it is....
 
Rob
DVs is for "unsatisfactory" the CV is probably hatting.
 
are there hats for close-voting?
 
@user1306322 I do it often.... rule of thumb: add "in my opinion" before anything I say. :P
 
Don't think so
I think I'd have gotten them already
 
8:45 AM
@ShadowTheBurningWizard No such command 'hats'.
 
another bot would have said they hate hats...
 
Rob
Could be any of a half dozen people really, some people know they share their account; others perhaps not. Even we get the "Evil Twin" story sometimes, or WiFi hacked.
 
hats are like a bot in some ways, so bot rivalry is not unexpected
 
8:48 AM
is there any update on post reactions? are they coming to all posts? what set of reactions?
 
that reminded me of Don't Starve
 
@user1306322 likely same as they already put in Teams, if the feedback will be positive.
 
the 4 useless ones?
then I feel like it's been set up for failure if that's the case
 
Rob
@user1306322 Yes, the 180° hat.
 
8:51 AM
Those ^
 
@user1306322 there'll likely be a userscript to remove it :D
 
no need for a userscript this is just a matter of css
 
Custom style sheet
 
USERSCRIPT ALL. THE. THINGS!
 
Think Chrome disabled it, no?
 
8:53 AM
who uses chrome anyways
 
I don't run chrome. :D
 
@user1306322 everyone
Even people who don't
 
FF was always slower for me
 
well that certainly contradicts what you just said :p (twice even)
 
8:53 AM
@user1306322 I run vivaldi... which is a chrome fork.
 
Rob
That cancels it out.
 
the slower one was the one with ads, and since FF has a working adblock (this post was made by ublock origin gang), it's faster
 
I also run falkon... which... uses the chrome core.
Edge? Chrome fork soon
Opera? ... you guessed it....
(which is a pity - presto was a nice engine)
 
Opera also has some of that juicy controversial Chinese ownership
 
Why Facebook don't make their own browser? ;)
 
8:55 AM
I think they already have all the Chrome users
@ShadowTheBurningWizard I don't think it makes sense to try and gauge community desire for a feature by measuring the desire of a limited subset of Teams only
propose it on public meta and see
I'm pretty sure among the first posts there will be a dozen suggesting other reactions than these 4 placeholder ones
 
@user1306322 that's actually how its never worked :D
 
that sounds concerning
well then has anyone made a suggestion to use some other, more useful reactions on Teams yet?
 
@user1306322 don't think Teams have Meta
Or do they?
 
I suppose I have no idea how this network works behind the scenes
 
@user1306322 In the old days - it was mostly Jeff deciding
The difference is/was how connected folks were to the users
 
9:02 AM
-11
Q: Non-anonymous "Thanks" or "Like" button

Dan FabulichToday, upvoting is anonymous; the recipient knows they were upvoted, but they don't know who upvoted them, so it's not a public personal gesture. The only way to let someone know who likes your answer is to comment, often by saying "Thanks!" which adds nothing to the discussion. There should be ...

Nice answer by Jeff
 
For initial specing out- its internal. I've done one survey (on some mod tools) and skipped one (on teams - I skipped that cause it was at a low point for me and the community) - both before the loop.
For making a decision, maybe focus groups work. For refinement in the field, I'm still a fan of meta
 
I just have a feeling that showcasing this new proposal with these 4 specific mostly useless reactions is akin to setting it up for failure, deliberately or not, I feel like I have to comment on that and propose to change these for the initial discussion already
 
Rob
└། ๑ _ ๑ །┘
 
Are those horns?
 
nah it's the mario pipe top
 
9:08 AM
@user1306322 and... that's part of development.
 
feed the pipe
 
because I sense that the tone is supposed to be something nice, I'd suggest only the positive reactions for now, like "high quality post", "strongly agree", "well phrased", "important announcement"/"deserves attention"
 
Rob
The Ankole-Watusi is a modern American breed of domestic cattle. It derives from the Ankole group of Sanga cattle breeds of central Africa. It is characterized by very large horns. == History == The Ankole-Watusi derives from cattle of Ankole type imported to Germany as zoo specimens in the early twentieth century. From Germany, these spread to other European zoos. Some were imported to the United States, and in 1960 a herd was started in New York State by cross-breeding some of them with an unrelated Canadian bull.:110 A breed society, the Ankole Watusi International Registry, was set up in 1983...
 
And for something like this how people use, and not use them are important bits of data
 
just make it actual common reactions that people tend to comment with
idk what "red semibold one hundred twice underlined" means
 
Rob
9:10 AM
All the reactions have to be positive and friendly, so some possible reactions won't be included.
 
the two hands clapping together is also good for Anime.SE for alchemist transmutation spell casting I suppose >.>
@Rob yea I feel like this reduces their maximum potential, like in cases where you know a post is worthy of a downvote but you can't quite put it into a comment and so just downvote and go, while the poster might be left confused, but if there was a quick reaction like "badly formatted" or "probably a duplicate" that might clear things up with the poster and be useful. I don't see this as negative personally. It feels better than to be left in the blind.
basically instead of "negative reactions" think (and actually provide) "valid criticism" but without specifics
for specifics, you can write up a comment, but for when you don't want to / don't know how/ etc, you can use a quick one-click reaction
 
Rob
Like a "back to the drawing board" reaction, or magnifying glass (take another closer look), etc.
 
well, maybe a miniature manual pictogram :p
not the letters "RTFM" but something a bit less obscene
"you can easily find the answer in the documentation for this" - would be the message you want to convey
I think that if such reactions which mean specific things about how to improve content or which note how exactly the content is already good, were a thing, we would see an increase in quality
and positive outlook on the site in general
 
Rob
How about: 𓃒
Bull
 
it might feel like it turns the site into a bit of a kindergarten with all the colorful "friendly" icons but it just might be the most efficient solution to the SO problems which canned comments couldn't solve and the perception of the rules being convoluted and general lack of clarity on how to improve a bad post
@Rob as funny as a poop emoji reaction may be, I don't think vague and unclear reaction pictograms are useful precisely because it's unclear what they mean or how they can be interpreted as constructive criticism (positive or negative)
as one of the core goals of the Q&A is to minimize noise, I think such reactions have no place
or should be brought to their clearest analogies
like Skeptics might enjoy a "red herring" reaction, as I see it used often in the comments, idk
some cartoon or game questions about "why did this character suddenly fly all the way to the moon" could be reacted to with "anime physics"
 
Rob
9:26 AM
It needs the complicated multi-point rating:
 
(because some questions just don't have a scientific explanation and it's only something done for fun by creators of the fictional world, like scoobydoo falling physics or loony tunes / ren and stimpy wacky face warping)
 
Rob
Replacing each of those categories with something appropriate for Q&As.
 
Syngergy, Quantum, Logistics :p
 
But that adds complexity :D
 
Rob
Too much
A second set of tags for what needs fixing, and rely on many upvotes to indicate that it's pretty much fixed.
 
9:33 AM
probably show a small time graph of vote history dynamics to see if the votes have been increasing for or against a specific reaction, like at first many people agreed a post was low quality but lately (after it was improved) found this reaction doesn't reflect the new reality :p
 
Rob
That allows exactness, expansion, easy implementation (using existing code), Review, blocking, everything tags offer us for "subject categorization" but applied to "fault finding" (or "lack of faults found, for 60 days) - status-complete).
 
announcements are one thing, they rarely change, but general posts are supposed to change, and so are the reactions to them
votes change already and we don't get to see the vote change dynamics, only the total and the breakdown of upvotes and downvotes if you have enough rep
 
Rob
GTG for an hour, thx for the chat.
 
grey to grey for an hour! that is a horrific display panel!
RTX GPU WTF BBQ :p
to summarize regarding reactions: I think they need to be specific and clear and be useful as valid criticism and be able to be voted against for when problems with the post are fixed (or in case the post gets worse through bad edits)
and there's gotta be a way to view the reaction vote history or a visual graph to gauge what the public reaction was over time, kinda like Steam Reviews have, because games also can get better or worse through time
 
 
1 hour later…
10:47 AM
hmmmm smallest child now has a nerf gun
 
11:11 AM
@djsmiley2kindarkness I think @M.A.R. mentioned target practice yesterday, but if I understood correctly the kid is supposed to be the target :P
 
11:42 AM
@djsmiley2kindarkness smallest means 1 year old?
 
12:16 PM
🐱‍🚀
 
@ShadowTheBurningWizard 3 yr old
 
Nice
My son got nerf gun for his 5th birthday
But it just sits unused almost ever since.
The 2.5 y/o daughter sometimes takes it and try to shoot.
 
1:01 PM
@ShadowTheBurningWizard thine
 
well we got him a knock off large gun, and then one of the small nerf pistols as well
 
i'm amazed at how powerful the pistol is.
 
-22
Q: "Nico-nico-nii~♡" is NOT ALLOWED on Stack Exchange

Maika_Sakuran0miyaI just raised a moderator flag and it was dismissed as declined in a short while. It says "flags should only be used to make mods aware of content that requires their intervention." Well, there are five different flag decline reasons on this site: Declined comment/recommend closure flag: Decl...

... why is this even — E_net4 the safe downvoter 3 hours ago
Why is this even indeed
 
I can't even answer, because of the words I'd use aren't allowed to describe people who shouldn't be allowed.
 
 
Rob
1:36 PM
Check out Jim Shine at the bottom. He should keep that avatar past New Year.
 
I have some how made it through this year without a hat
woo!
 
2:13 PM
 
 
1 hour later…
3:23 PM
@M.A.R. Nico Nico ♥
 
 
2 hours later…
Rob
5:13 PM
@Feeds it's true!
 
 
1 hour later…
6:28 PM
@M.A.R. Now that we exhausted all questions about what Einstein said, let's move on to things he certainly didn't say ....
 
@rene Can you please add meta.stackexchange.com/questions/36148/… to the duplicate list of meta.stackexchange.com/questions/341070/…? While that question is itself closed as a duplicate of your original target, I feel its answers better address the latter question.
 
done
 
6:54 PM
Hmmm. As per every year. I'm done
 
@rene "By the power of greyskull! I have the power!"
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog with Christmas
 
fine with me
 

« first day (3430 days earlier)      last day (1585 days later) »