Hold on a second there. That whole statement is not only incredibly stupid, it's also based on an
assumption. Not fact. It's a known
fact that people like to
hack things. Whether it be hardware or software. Many things (including software - and especially
my software) are designed in such a way that
allows users to hack it (in order to change things about it - in certain ways) - and that goes against their definition of hacking. I think we need to lay off on the rules a bit and take it on a case by case basis. Otherwise before you know it, nothing will be on-topic for this site. —
baeltazor Aug 10 at 11:36
In the page I have time and right of it some pictures. I wanna to create a button to jump for current time using Tampermonkey. Current time is a text in <h1>. Screenshots attach.
How to jump to some position. For example 07:39.
Btw if you will suggest external library plz show how to use it ...
What I want:
I have a clojure program on a remote site, let's call it mccarthy.
What I want to do is connect to a nrepl-ritz from my laptop, preferably using nrepl-ritz-jack-in. The jack in works fine for a local program, but doesn't seem to connect to a remote program.
Attempt 1
C-x C-f on /...
If a tag ever needed a cleanup, it's hacking.
The tag wiki defines its purpose in a way that makes it (barely) on-topic for Stack Overflow:
Activities related to making hardware and software do things they were not originally designed to do.
Of the 804 questions with the tag, I have yet to...
Should [hacking] be burninated? It's a meta tag.
The alternative that's already happening is a cleanup, and burnination of hack and anti-hacking.
Can anyone tell me that in which operating system or technology the Thread pools were introduced.?
