« first day (1131 days earlier)      last day (3889 days later) » 

12:08 AM
Nope.
Only on Tuesdays.
 
Ewwww
 
I know, I hate Tuesdays.
I'm having some trouble wrapping my head around something (figuratively).
I have a domain name registered with company A, and I rent a hosting environment from company B. I also have email with company B.
There's an "a record" set up with company A that points it to the IP of my hosting environment with company B.
Where do I set up my "mx record" (for email)? Both company A and company B have a place where I can set that.
This is probably not the right place to be asking questions like that.
 
 
2 hours later…
2:34 AM
I would think the same one as the A record, since they're the authoritative source of your DNS records presumably. But nobody asked me.
 
 
2 hours later…
4:08 AM
@mootinator That's what I ended up doing. And I did ask you, kind of =P
 
4:40 AM
\o/
 
Thanks for your feedback.
I'm just stumbling through this stuff.
And my "this stuff" I mean "everything, all the time".
 
Life.
 
Yeah, that thing.
 
5:02 AM
The answer is Diablo 3
 
NEW CONTENT!
I played the other day for the first time in quite a while, and it was really fun.
I am also chatting with Microsoft Support right now, and it is notably less fun.
 
:/
I'm going to play.
Assuming I can remember my password.
 
You should, man.
 
 
1 hour later…
6:30 AM
new tag can only be created with a new question?
 
6:48 AM
That sounds a bit unfortunate for me because I would like to create a tag without it, and start retagging questions related to that... I have no question right now which would belong to that tag though.
 
38
Q: Can we please have the [foo] tag on SO?

PopsCan someone please create the tag foo on Stack Overflow? We need to have it because Foo is a recent/upcoming release of a popular, established OS/language/framework Foo is a hot new language/library we're currently using some other tag for questions about Foo, but it's causing ambiguity with a ...

 
OK, so I can add it with the help of existing questions, only. Thanks.
Pops: I tried to add the "qtserialport" tag with some explanation. Is that visible? I did not get any feedback like for the usual edit.
and the tag is not created....
 
Hmm. Did you edit the body or just add the tag?
 
Just tag
 
I think that might be an edge case at your rep level... not completely sure offhand though.
 
7:02 AM
what do you mean? I reached 1500 last night.
 
Right. But editing posts, for users below 2000 rep, is still a (relatively) new feature. I think there might be some logic in there that discards submissions where nothing in the body was changed. That's not based on any knowledge of the code, just a vague memory of someone mentioning the bug in the past... I'll try to bring it up tomorrow when someone's awake.
 
Pops: I am now writing a post on meta then.
 
That said, there are a few spelling and grammar errors in the existing post; could you try fixing those (or making some kind of body change) and letting me know if that works?
That's good too.
 
was there a discussion about this already?
I do not wanna create a dup, and quick search does not bring up anything either ... I might seek the wrong terms though...
 
Not that I'm aware of.
 
7:09 AM
Pops: which tag should I add to such a question?
 
[stackoverflow] [tags] [editing] [reputation]
 
Pops: At least one of these tags is required - 'bug feature-request discussion support'.
support?
yeah, done with support, not bug for now... just in case.
 
7:58 AM
Pops: who will be the tag creator in that case btw? The author or the reviewer?
 
 
2 hours later…
9:49 AM
Could someone please remove all the comments for the initial question? stackoverflow.com/questions/18462420/… After the discussion, they are just noise, and the problem is already solved, and I made the author aware.
 
Just flag for moderator attention using the "other" option.
 
 
4 hours later…
1:59 PM
how can I initiate a tag removal?
 
That depends @LaszloPapp. Which tag?
 
qt-serial-port
luckily it is not yet used by any questions.
 
Then you don't have to worry. It will be gone within 24 hours
Tags without questions are automatically cleaned up
 
what if someone uses it before that?
 
Then it will stay around until someone untags
 
2:09 PM
exactly, so I would like to initiate the removal now.
to be sure and safe.
since that tag makes no sense.
7
Q: Trying to add new tag (1.5K user) results in instant "This item is no longer reviewable"

Laszlo PappI just reached 1500 rep last night on Stack Overflow, and I thought it would be nice to create a tag for our project "QtSerialPort". Having read the text on the url below, I am about to go to the corresponding existing questions, to add yet another tag to them. http://lists.qt-project.org/piper...

someone created it here mistakenly.
 
I guess @Oded can confirm that the process I've described is the one to take. There are several users in the community keeping an eye on newly created tags. I'd say there is nothing to worry about. Worst case we appropriately retag it, should it end up being used.
 
Is it hard to delete explicitly?
 
Not looking at code right now, but I believe since the rep level is low enough, the edit went into the suggest edits queue. Which makes the post ineligible for review.
@LaszloPapp That's overly "paranoid". If someone retags, you remove the tag. So it takes one more day.
 
except that if someone uses that....
 
@LaszloPapp We don't have any system in place for that. That's what the automatic delete is for.
 
2:13 PM
why are these illogical ways? The reason is that, the code behind the site is unable to support it easily?
 
After which you untag it and add the appropriate tag (once it's created)
 
@LaszloPapp Because we have over 100 sites and can't babysit all tags.
 
tags get created and removed all the time
 
deleting one tag for request != babysit
 
Times 100 sites?
 
2:14 PM
and automatic delete is not the same as deleting consciously.
there is no any guarantee someone will not use it.
 
And yet we never have a real problem with it.
 
Someone has to go in and retag - that's not automatic. The automatic side of it is the deletion of the tag altogether. It really isn't a problem.
 
sure, we do.... there is one here at hand already....
 
Why devote human resources to something that can be automated? Why increase the load on moderators/developers?
 
why do strange workflow for tag deletion? I could also ask this.
 
2:17 PM
What's illogical to you may not be illogical to others. And there is a history to things and reasons for things being done a certain way that you may not be aware of.
 
That post does not tell too much.
if you wanna mean, "we do the right things, you just do not know" then nothing would be changed on the site.
which was mistaken in the past.
Anyways, how can I check who created a tag?
 
Tags get created and removed and questions are retagged all the times. Having someone look at tags reaching 0 tagged questions and then deleting them makes no sense to me.
 
we are not discussing deleting 0 tagged questions
 
Also, consider that we have a very large database - deleting "orphan" tags in one go makes more sense than one at a time (in terms of impact on the DB)
 
that is a completely different topic
we are discussing an insanely created tag
IOW, insane tag != unused.
 
2:19 PM
Then the process is to remove it from all questions tagged with it.
 
you are talking about different things... it is hard to get a common ground this way.
you are focusing on defending the system for automatic deletion, whereas the request at hand is to delete an insanely created tag asap.
 
Go make it a feature request then.
 
Well, you are saying there is a tag that isn't making sense. I say - ok. Do something about it and remove it from all questions tagged with it. So it will get deleted.
 
But I'm pretty sure @Oded knows what he's talking about here.
 
where can I do that?
 
2:20 PM
@LaszloPapp Do what?
 
I would be happy to remove insane tags once I have the rep whatever it takes... whether you would not, that is your business.
 
@LaszloPapp You can already do that by suggested edits.
 
You make suggested edits to the posts. Adding an edit summary explaining the removal.
 
no, I cannot.
there is no option for deleting a tag now
which is the whole point here.
 
And if you're asking about feature-requests, they go on Meta. Tag them [feature-request].
 
2:22 PM
/me will do that
 
Let me tell you in advance that I would be surprised to not see that [status-declined] pretty rapidly.
 
Also, I had another question above ... how can I check who created a tag?
that would be pretty silly.
if a few mods do not wanna clean up the mess asap, that should not block others doing it who are willing to contribute with that.
or a similar question to the above: how can I check what tags a person created?
 
@LaszloPapp As far as I know, there is no way to find out. It isn't important either.
 
for you
 
What would you do with the information? Contact the user? How?
 
2:26 PM
may know him?
is it so impossible in a community?
 
So? We are not a social network and we very much don't want to become one.
The focus is on questions and answers, not people.
 
I have no idea what that means
there is no any social networking in question in here.
 
You say you want to find out about a person so you can contact them. That's a social aspect.
 
communication about improving tags is not bad, and it would not even happen on SO, hence your answers are totally off to me
No, that is a technical aspect
to improve the site. To me, it seems only you think it social. I definitely do not know.
 
We have chat for this kind of thing. You can always get some people together to discuss tags. It actually happens here on occasion - when mass retags are needed.
Frankly, it feels like you are making a mountain of a molehill. Tags are easy enough to create and delete that it really doesn't matter. Just retag and fix it.
 
2:33 PM
what should I discuss with you if you have no clue?
or someone else?
 
And if it's really a tag that is so problematic that a discussion is needed, take it to Meta. Then we have a clear history. See all the discussions on tag removal we already have on there.
 
do you seriously think there is always someone here for any tag?
You are entitled to think it is easy, however I think it is currently messy.
You cannot delete an insane tag ASAP, even if you wish!
Bart, sorry but past mistakes are no excuse for future.
 
Can you stop your hyperbole? A user tried to help you out and created a wrongly hyphenated tag. It is on no question atm and will be gone within 12 hours from now.
 
you cannot cover everything by "dude, we had a discussion, there cannot be more, and it is set in stone, no matter what"
 
What? I'm saying Meta is THE PLACE to discuss tag removals
 
2:36 PM
if the world worked like that, there would not be changes and evolution.
 
If it is a tag that's in heavy use, take it to meta and propose the removal.
 
why would I discuss it for hours when a simple button could be pressed FFS ...
 
Then make that a feature request. I told you to.
But you do realize that Oded is a developer on the site, right? So his input might mean something.
 
@LaszloPapp And what if people disagree with you? What if there are people who actually see value in the tag and do want to use it?
Your whole argument at the moment is - "the tag is crazy and should be removed, because I don't like it". And you also don't like the way the system currently works.
 
@Bart: I mean not discussing development details
so I do not think the development details are too relevant
I am discussing higher layers: use cases.
@Oded: so you think that tag should not be deleted, and I should use that tag to go ahead and tag the questions I wanted?
 
2:40 PM
@LaszloPapp Oded is also a long time contributor to both meta and main
 
Manishearth: I saw that, so what?
 
That tag will be deleted @LaszloPapp. Automatically.
 
@LaszloPapp So his input still means something
 
@LaszloPapp I say there is no immediacy. You are welcome to disagree.
 
@Manisheath: so what?
@Manisheath: I am not allowed to bring up a feature request because I am new here?
I am not allowed to try improving the site?
 
2:41 PM
I love how you put words into people's mouths.
 
Feature requests go on Meta. Go right ahead. Any user can make them.
 
@Oded: please answer my question: yes/no
 
@LaszloPapp Where's the feature request?
 
This is no way to discuss things constructively.
 
In chat? Sure, bring it up, discuss it, but that won't mean it will get implemented. Feature requests belong on the meta.
 
2:42 PM
@Oded: you claimed something, and then I gave a rebruttal, and then you do not answer.
 
@LaszloPapp Anyone can bring up feature requests. They don't even have to be registered.
 
"@LaszloPapp And what if people disagree with you? What if there are people who actually see value in the tag and do want to use it?"
"
@Oded: so you think that tag should not be deleted, and I should use that tag to go ahead and tag the questions I wanted?"
 
But - ignoring all the history and not providing anything new is a sure way to get your request shot down.
 
could you please answer that comprehensive question? I am interested in what you think.
 
@LaszloPapp He doesn't think that.
He's saying that there may be people who think that.
 
2:43 PM
@Manishearth: let him speak for himself.
 
@LaszloPapp Well, I doubt he will if you keep badgering him.
 
WTF?
 
2 mins ago, by Oded
This is no way to discuss things constructively.
 
I asked a question sincerely based on which I would prove why the claim was irrelevant in the first place.
yeah, so you jump on a new person just because he is new
 
@LaszloPapp Sure. And then you started being demanding.
 
2:45 PM
@LaszloPapp That's not what I said. Let me be very clear. If the tag is something you believe is not good, go ahead and remove it from all questions. It will get deleted, after a day. What I am not agreeing with is your sense of immediacy - that "the tag needs to go now".
 
and when he brings up valid concerns, then you tag him non-constructive.
how nice.
 
8 mins ago, by Laszlo Papp
why would I discuss it for hours when a simple button could be pressed FFS ...
 
And I might add to Oded's remarks that if there is a significant number of questions with that tag, please take it to Meta first to discuss the validity of the tag.
 
Please stop with the personal attacks and with the martyr facade. It gets old, fast.
 
Yeah.
 
2:45 PM
@Manishearth: thanks for repasting
 
If this keeps up the tag will be gone soon anyway
 
@Manishearth: that is a very important post to highlight the drawback of the system
 
In regards to:
10 mins ago, by Laszlo Papp
why would I discuss it for hours when a simple button could be pressed FFS ...
 
@Oded: the only personal attack I see ignoring technical arguments said by me.
 
Why? Because that's how we do things here.
 
2:47 PM
yes, so something is insane, and it cannot be suggested to improve?
 
Feature request.... make it already ....
 
You are being impatient. And that certainly doesn't help with convincing other about change.
 
@Bart: off-topic
we all know where FR goes, but people jumped on me, and not letting me answer to those is impolite to say the least.
@Oded: it has nothing to do with impatience.
 
Feature requests do not belong in chat
 
if a tag is mistakenly created, and someone wishes to clean it up right away, why on earth would he be blocked?
@random: off topic
 
2:49 PM
Well, for someone who shows every sign of impatience, where you have been told the process, you seem happy to discuss it here (where nothing will be done) for hours, instead of using the proper channel.
 
we know it belongs to the forum, and I will do that
.I even explicitly said
 
@LaszloPapp You're not being blocked. You're just not using the right channels.
 
but do not expect a few people jump on me with IMHO invalid claims, and I cannot reply.
 
Why is it that in any discussion you are somehow the victim @LaszloPapp? (Yeah yeah, off-topic...)
 
@Bart Off topic
3
 
2:50 PM
@random off topic is off topic
 
@Oded: do not jump on new comers with full of invalid concerns in their opinion, so that you do not demotivate that, etc... and then you will not reply to you, but go to the forum.
You can take it as a lesson for the future.
 
All we are saying is that we have been around for a while, we know the community and the history of certain features and how the community reacts to certain feature requests. We are trying to give you some of the knowledge. You are most welcome to ignore this.
 
@Manishearth That is not always true. It oscillates.
 
Manishearth: we are blocked.
 
@Manishearth Let's migrate to SU
 
2:51 PM
Manishearth: I could not remove the tag right away even if I wanted.
 
instead, I have to discuss it for hours.
and others, too.
rather than just one person pressing a button.
 
@Bart Feature request: Rename MSO to Oscillations.SE
4
 
@Oded You crazy? When we have Programmers?
 
lol
 
2:52 PM
@LaszloPapp There is no button. As mentioned, you're welcome to suggest to the developers to add that button
 
Haha @YiJiang I might consider it....
 
@LaszloPapp That could apply anywhere. I could pester Oded to delete Bart because it's just a three-click process.
Right, @Bart ?
 
@Yi: thanks, that is at least not a demotivating answer.
 
@LaszloPapp Yes. You don't live in a vacuum. Things you want are things others may not want. So, to get things done you need to discuss and come to an agreement first.
 
@Manishearth all my sockpuppets would thank you
 
2:53 PM
There is no button. Only oscillations.
 
@Bart oh noes the man has sockpuppets!
 
@Oded: you are stating the obvious.
@Oded: my problem was rather the demotivating style, and "because you are a newcomer, you should just read the history and agree with that, no matter what".
 
@LaszloPapp Who said that?
 
do you want me to paste?
 
@LaszloPapp when was that? Bart later on mentioned that Oded was a dev, so probably knew what he was talking about.
That just means to say that "remember that he's talking from experience"
 
2:54 PM
We say - please learn from the past. Please take our input into consideration so you don't get shot down in Meta.
 
There was no "no matter what" or any other thing like that
 
@LaszloPapp Yes, please do.
 
sec
 
3
Q: Deleting misspelt tags

Dheeraj V.S.Under the newest tags section of Stackoverflow, I found the tags elipse and javascrpt which are likely to have been created as a result of a typo. Is there a way to suggest removal of such tags? If so, where? And how much rep is required for that privilege? I don't think suggesting a synonym woul...

 
meta.stackoverflow.com/users/212998/trab @Manishearth but they will never find out
 
2:55 PM
"All we are saying is that we have been around for a while, we know the community and the history of certain features and how the community reacts to certain feature requests. We are trying to give you some of the knowledge. You are most welcome to ignore this."
 
And how does this == stfu?
 
And you translate that to a STFU? Oh boy.
 
It is rude at best.
especially the end.
 
But please do not misrepresent what people did say. You may interpret it your way but most others don't.
 
it implies that the only thing I wanna is ignore.
 
2:56 PM
@Oded Must be a weakly typed language we're using here
 
@LaszloPapp No it doesn't
 
I'd like to think this is a cultural issue, but I doubt it.
 
In fact, it implies the opposite.
They're asking you to take that into consideration, but not forcing you
 
I rarely find in communities new people willing to improve things shot down this harsh.
 
@LaszloPapp Try reddit.
 
2:57 PM
I have read enough of your posts (comments and chat) by now to know how easily you get offended - when no offence was meant.
 
frankly, I already lost my motivation.
to do anything on this front.
and I will go ahead, and tag with that crap
all the questions I wanted.
 
I rarely find users who are so unwilling to listen to the motivations of those who actually implement the damn system as to why their requests might not be necessary, nor a good idea.
 
People try to help you and you get offended immediately. Wow.
 
it would be overly crap, inconsistent, etc, but I am not willing to come back to this tomorrow anymore, so I will just do that
 
Why does the tagging have to be immediate? Is this dependent on product launch?
 
2:59 PM
.@Bart: then you must be doing something wrong.
 
Now it feels like you are trying to push your agenda onto the whole network and finding it incredible that we push back.
 
@Bart: new people have a lot of ideas which are also getting integrated into projects.
 
@Oded exactly
 
17
Q: I accidentally created a tag. How do I delete it?

Andrew ShepherdI attempted to ask a question regarding "object-role-modeling" (it's a design methodology that doesn't get nearly enough attention as it should). Unfortunately, when I wrote the question, I made a spelling error and assigned it to a non-existent tag "object-role-modelling". I realised my mistake...

 
regardless some blocker rather than helper people are in the way at the beginning.
 

« first day (1131 days earlier)      last day (3889 days later) »