@ShadowWizardLoveZelda Workarounds, if posted by the author, are better edited into the question rather than posted as answers. If found by others, then they're better as answers. — Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog 56 secs ago

Thanks, this is neat! — Zhou Haibo just now

I understood the spirit of your question. That's why I posted a comment, not an answer. I accept that your selection criteria is more complex than you first presented, but that changes nothing. In reality, you are using SEDE as just a source for all the data on your answers. That's something the SE API is specifically designed to do. I'd argue that what you're actually doing is even more a task for the SE API, which is intended for such programmatic access and can easily accomplish downloading as JSON the data you're currently getting from SEDE as a CSV file (which you then have to parse). — Makyen 6 secs ago

Hi EMELDAH Chiluba, welcome to the Stack Exchange Network Meta site! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an expert's answer for the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — Spevacus 21 secs ago

Be aware that homework questions (questions showing little to no effort to demonstrate any prior research or attempt to answer the question) are closed on most sites. — W.O. 20 secs ago

@Shadow In this case, “revs” stands for revisions (not revives or reviews). — Elements In Space 30 secs ago

The first sentence of the Apr 25 update says it hasn't rolled out to chat yet. — animuson ♦ 7 secs ago

Yup - and given the attention Meta Stack Exchange Chat gets, that might be all that ever happens. — Criggie 22 secs ago

It seems ... inappropriate (to the point I'm tempted to flag this as R/A) ... to post this now when they extremely clearly state, and you obviously know, that they haven't deployed this to chat yet and they have given a very near-future date for doing that deployment. At least give them the until somewhat past the time they have stated it will happen. You're basically saying I don't trust you at all (in a more rude manner), even though they have done a good job on this project to announce it beforehand, keep up with updates, and address issues as they arise. — Makyen 8 secs ago

Since it relates to only one site on the network, this should be posted on that site's meta, not here on main meta. In fact, it's already been posted about there: Where did the "simulate this circuit" link go?. — W.O. 59 secs ago

IMO, this belongs here on MSE. While the specific thing does only affect a single site, it's nearly certain that it's the result of the network-wide change in the image uploader, given that the "simulate this circuit" functionality is directly tied into the URL used for those images. All of the bugs for this network-wide project are supposed to be here on MSE. — Makyen 10 secs ago

Second thoughts, I agree. Close-vote withdrawn. @Makyen — W.O. 51 secs ago

It's been posted about on electronics meta a few hours ago, but may be symptomatic of network-wide issues to come. — W.O. 20 secs ago

@W.O. no, since this is unique to a single site. It is off topic here. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 1 min ago

While I don't trust SE either and won't be surprised a bit if they'll end up not deploying this to chat at all, I do agree with @Makyen that it's too early to rant about it in a post. Since imgur will simply drop the support soon, it means chat upload will be totally broken soon, probably 6-8 weeks or even less, and then we'll see what, if anything, SE will do. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 27 secs ago

@Sonic I disagree, but that's not something I'll fight over. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 58 secs ago

That'd been my initial reaction, but rethought it and withdrew the close vote on reflection. When I search for related posts here, there aren't any. So maybe it's a one-shot for that meta. Frankly I'm undecided. @ShadowWizardLoveZelda — W.O. 1 min ago

@ElementsInSpace well yeah, but changing that to the correct "The post has 95 revisions" would be too radical change, IMO. And revisions consist, usually, of edits and reviews leading to edits, so it's not totally wrong. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 35 secs ago

@W.O. if other unique features are bugged, each deserves its own bug report on the dedicated per-site meta. I had no idea what "Simulate this circuit" is at all, and would have voted to close this as "unclear", or "not related to Stack Exchange" if not for the comments which led me to realize there's such a feature in one of the SE sites. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda just now

Fair enough. I take it there's a channel through which the staff get to know about per-site meta bug reports (at least if there's loads). @ShadowWizardLoveZelda — W.O. 12 secs ago

Imgur service ... it is since last week no longer imgur: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/395024/… — rene 5 secs ago

@rene Yes, hence past tense. — Tim Williams 44 secs ago

Ah, fair. I wasn't sure when I parsed that. — rene 33 secs ago

Hi Yassmine Mohhamed, welcome to the Stack Exchange Network Meta site! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an expert's answer for the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — rene 34 secs ago

Hi user24774774, welcome to the Stack Exchange Network Meta site! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an expert's answer for the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — Journeyman Geek 53 secs ago

@JourneymanGeek I also think that this user need to improve the way of writing questions. I found that it is difficult to understand it. — user1176409 50 secs ago

Default Vip Sure — Name Javed just now

So... it's just a job feed from indeed? an ad? — Kevin B 28 secs ago

The help center article here link is a 404. — dan1st 6 secs ago

@dan1st we are having a small error there, working on resolving it asap. — Sasha ♦ 1 min ago

here here. my thoughts exactly. — Daniel A. White 38 secs ago

Why is this posted on MSE as opposed to MSO as this is only about "the developer community"? — dan1st just now

To be honest, I think that SO reputation isn't really a good metric employers should consider. — dan1st 44 secs ago

@dan1st "and technical stack exchange sites" — starball 24 secs ago

If this wasn't such a shit community filled with willfully ignorant idiots and trolls (moderators included), maybe I would stick around. Account deleted. — Nicole B 52 secs ago

@dan1st They shouldn't, but they do. When looking for a job, it's at least nice to be able to take advantage of anything relevant — Zoe is on strike 42 secs ago

did you mean to say "connected"? — starball 38 secs ago

Everyone flag this as spam. — user1176409 41 secs ago

@Sasha "... will be hosted on its own domain". Assuming it's not a subdomain of stackexchange.com / stackoverflow.com, any chance you could add the domain to this list of domains? — cocomac just now

You're right. The original title on this post was not an accurate description of what the post is actually about. I updated it with something that I think is a better fit, and which is the same title I used in the post giving the mods a heads up about this in their private team a few weeks back. — Sasha ♦ 44 secs ago

You make good points about the original title of this post. It has since been updated, which I [explained here] (meta.stackexchange.com/questions/399440/…). — Sasha ♦ just now

The title has just been edited. Does that address your concerns? — wizzwizz4 37 secs ago

@starball: No, but it ought to be rephrased. It has to be read several times. — This_is_NOT_a_forum 37 secs ago

It ought to be rephrased. — This_is_NOT_a_forum 54 secs ago

Off-topic or on-topic, this does not contain sufficient context. For example, where did the "Simulate this circuit" below schematics disappear? — This_is_NOT_a_forum 35 secs ago

@Tensibai I guess it could have some value to SO Inc. in that they can get telemetry on what people click on and so get data about jobs their users are interested in, but I don't think that's what you were asking about (value to us- the users) — starball just now

This does not seem answerable. Even if posted on the right site, it would probably be closed. Maybe it already was closed (and deleted) somewhere else? — This_is_NOT_a_forum 56 secs ago

@Shadow Are you saying that “The question was revised/edited 96 times” would be too radical a change? — Elements In Space 1 min ago

cont' - The Stack Exchange sites are not forums (fora?). — This_is_NOT_a_forum 37 secs ago

This kind of question is better suited for Reddit where there are trained psychics (allegedly) — This_is_NOT_a_forum 17 secs ago

Does this answer your question? Clicking on reputation change brings me to the post ID on the site I am on and not the site that the reputation change is on — CPlus just now

There was a similar one between Google and Reddit. — This_is_NOT_a_forum 28 secs ago

@W.O. yes they (should?) monitor all meta sites. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 32 secs ago

@Aaron since this is pretty high priority (missing important feature) can you perhaps poke a developer to take a look? You know I don't ask such things on ordinary bugs. Thanks for sending it to review anyway. :) — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda just now

Hi Aryan Kapoor, welcome to Meta! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an answer from users that have the expertise about the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — Sam Onela just now

Is there a reason for the markdown list? I feel like it could as well be a normal sentence. — dan1st 37 secs ago

@ElementsInSpace yes, because the OP asks "And do I get the rest right?" before that, so if it's not right, making it right in the question with edit is wrong, IMO. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 31 secs ago

What W.O. points out is that you might have to break up the question into several parts - especially since, as you say, "the question has several different aspects" - and ask those on appropriate sites (and as for your earlier comment: that "bureaucracy" is there for a reason, and is usually the product of great deliberation of the community, and can, even so, still be discussed on a community's meta site. Yes, knowledge should be valued above categorization, but that's an extremely blurry starting point, since that might suggest everyone can just dump anything there in the name of knowledge.) — Joachim 45 secs ago

@dan1st Yes, they group the words around the focal points of this long sentence. It does not look badly to my eye, but I am not sure. — peterh 46 secs ago

Does this answer your question? Upvoting comments from review queues often fails because t.state is null — Joachim 53 secs ago

I don't exactly see how this was a reversal, more, the careers feature (job ads) is just getting a domain of it's own and a featured link to it — Kevin B 21 secs ago

I'll edit and highlight the point I was trying to make. — Criggie 7 secs ago

@dan1st Another important problem is that the this site is very evil, you get a bunch of downs for anything. In my case, the first down has already happened. However, if the community votes so deeply down for anything, that also actually removes my urge to do anything differently. So we have a clear mutually hostile stance and I do not change a f..g bit in the post. I am sad on that, but please understand me. — peterh 50 secs ago

@KevinB Yes. But the SO had good jobs. Later, I asked the HR girl by my employer, had she seen my Stack Overflow profile page? And the answer was surprising, she did not even knew that it existed :-) And I have lost yet another hope... — peterh 14 secs ago

@Shadow Staff have been on it since before I added the tag. I won't change a post to status-review unless I know someone is already actively looking at it (or that the person who will owes me a favor). — Aaron Bertrand 51 secs ago

@peterh i'm not sure why you @'d me on that, none of that is relevant to my comment, ;) It is true that most people outside of the tech world wouldn't be aware of SO or it's Jobs board. This new SO Jobs will just be a list of jobs from indeed, and as such noone will need to be aware of it's existence... since it doesn't really exist without indeed. — Kevin B 23 secs ago

@KevinB Ok. I think, for us, it does not really matter if it is an indeed project or an SO project. I would not close out that actually it is a very big ad project for the indeed. We will see that on the IPs (if the new Job SO is in the indeed network, it is more likely an indeed.com marketing project as an SO development project). We will see - I think, this "no personal data is shared" thing also means, the HR guys not even this time will even know, how big bunch of wonderful answers did I write, and it won't help me in selection processes... — peterh 11 secs ago

I do think that if employers need to enable this explicitly via some toggle that isn't immediately visible (i.e. made so that only those actually wanting to post it on new SO jobs get it), it could bring quite a bit of value for the reasons explained here — dan1st 13 secs ago

The new uploader says: "Supported file types: jpeg, png, gif, or bmp". — PM 2Ring 56 secs ago

I don't think "an error occurred" is any more descriptive than "unhandled web exception". In fact I think it's less descriptive. Both are clearly errors, but only one even hints at what kind of exception it is. — TylerH 52 secs ago

@TylerH I think the edit showing previous state was just meant to illustrate that the change didn't necessarily make anything worse, just that both states are similarly unactionable. — Aaron Bertrand just now

This was posted as an answer, but it does not attempt to answer the question. It should possibly be an edit, a comment, another question, or deleted altogether. — Mast 7 secs ago

This bug still exists, with the inconsistency between the preview and the final rendering still being present. — hb20007 33 secs ago

How is the question that you cited relevant to our discussion Under what circumstances may I add "urgent" or other similar phrases to my question, in order to obtain faster answers? - Meta Stack Overflow? — Timur Shtatland 59 secs ago

I did not add "the clock is ticking" to my question in the OP. My comment (not a question) was meant as a response to you. It was meant to explain why I want to chat with the suspended user - and cannot do so yet: "Meanwhile, the clock is ticking on my project at work, and my questions are pressing. So yes, this answerer is a good person to consult about this question of mine. But I cannot do this - not yet, at any rate." Please let me know if you have any questions about this. — Timur Shtatland 26 secs ago

Re: 'there's also supposed an implicit question in the frame challenge of "why don't you just ask the LLMs yourself"?' Because I do not think that the deleted answer os written by LLM. It looks like written by a human, see for yourself. — Timur Shtatland 6 secs ago

Here is the start of this answer. Where is the evidence that it is LLM-generated? "PostgreSQL's advisory locks from Adrian Klaver's answer, or feature flag, from Anton Bogdanov's answer are possible approaches. A simpler one would be to use a simple boolean flag in the database that job scripts check [...]." — Timur Shtatland 18 secs ago

Yeah, @AaronBertrand deduced my intent which was at least to document old state since it's not easy for end users to see. Working on a quick fix that makes this better overall. — KyleMit ♦ 43 secs ago

@AaronBertrand ah, so that makes it actually status-planned. Cheers! — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 21 secs ago

@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog Thank you for the link, I appreciate it! I found the answer by Catija useful, and agree with it. Moreover, in my final sentence above I do not ask for any evidence. I respect the rules around privacy of such evidence, and see the clear rationale for these rules. I simply state the obvious. Namely, no evidence available to me = the suspended user is not guilty in my view. I do not argue with the moderators who did what they did based on the information available to them. — Timur Shtatland 42 secs ago

you probably want a remote work toggle, too, in addition to those two search boxes — Kevin B 14 secs ago

@slate thank you mightily for the update i.sstatic.net/rUEjN4dk.png — Criggie 34 secs ago

@ShadowWizardLoveZelda Well, it did once they did enough review to know how they planned to fix it. The priority isn't going to stop, come here, and make sure the tag reflects the exact current state at this second. — Aaron Bertrand just now

I don't see why you'd want to convert it. bmp is a perfectly good format, supporting compressed 24-bit colour. — wizzwizz4 19 secs ago

@wizzwizz4 I think that comment was due to the file residing at i.sstatic.net/IYK4JzFW.png with the png extension so they assumed it was converted. If bmp ok then it should just be i.sstatic.net/IYK4JzFW.bmp — Cave Johnson 56 secs ago

@starball yes, I was alluding that foe lnc — Tensibai 19 secs ago

Hi Emy, welcome to the Stack Exchange Network Meta site! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an expert's answer for the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz 23 secs ago

Thanks @cocomac Forgot about even the possibility if that. — W.O. 8 secs ago

I mean I don't mind if a host were to convert it to an objectively better format (PNG, I think, supports everything and more that common BMP formats used? plus the compression is better, and obligatory). But that's a storage and bandwidth optimization. As a user, it doesn't matter to me, all I want is a pixel-exact (or high quality lossy-compressed, if too many colors) image out the other side. — Tim Williams 52 secs ago

@starball I've had problems with both, actually. — StingyJack 15 secs ago

@Bella_Blue - Still waiting for a response for my latest contact attempt. Its been almost a month now. Do you have a date for when Phillippe attempted to contact me? I figured it got routed to the same problem channel yet again. — StingyJack just now

@Mast This post is the victim of bullying. — peterh 40 secs ago

Also: stackstatus.net shows no outages... — Sam Onela 26 secs ago

No repro here in UK, I can interact with the site, no issues. However, I'm already logged in through stackexchange.com — W.O. 53 secs ago

Just tried signing in direct to GIS using a new account/different browser via Google, again no repro. — W.O. 29 secs ago

Possibly related (or possibly not): Why is Stack Overflow preventing signup with an invalid password message when the password meets the specified requirements? — W.O. 6 secs ago

This is not the expected behavior. A fix for bmp images is coming. In the meantime your workaround by changing to png works. — Troy Gould ♦ 35 secs ago

Updated the question. I am able to login using EDGE, but not Chrome. — Keagan Allan 48 secs ago

I'm sorry, but what? — Daedalus 59 secs ago

You pass electricity through your body like a conduit, and you also receive it from items like televisions. — Friday Caballero 51 secs ago

How does that have anything at all to do with what this question asks? — Daedalus 1 min ago

I'm no coder, but since the browsers I've used are both Chrome-based, it makes me wonder if you've disabled (or an update has disabled) JavaScript or some other essential component. — W.O. 29 secs ago