12:00 AM
1 hour later…
1:24 AM
Does this answer your question? What is serial voting and how does it affect me? — Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog 15 secs ago
@pinckerman The data is indeed gone. Part of the setup process each year was running a dev-only "delete-all-the-things" path which, well, emptied everything out of the database. We don't keep archives because the data is all gone. — animuson ♦ 50 secs ago
1 hour later…
2:39 AM
The answer below (and in the duplicate) are good, but I really think you should ask about this on Music Meta. I believe Music.SE is somewhat of an exception because most questions there aren’t related to programming, and so most users aren’t expecting to need to look for language tags. — Elements In Space 9 secs ago
5 hours later…
7:13 AM
If I look at network traffic I only see cloudflare cookies being send/set and those are not long lived. If there is tracking I doubt it is by means of client-side stuff. Worth mentioning that uploading images always passed through SE servers, and they know who you are, if not directly then at least by taking the network logging and stitch all the calls together. — rene 53 secs ago
7:44 AM
Does this answer your question? Don't force sync with my oldest account on my network profile — PeterJames 1 min ago
8:06 AM
@PeterJames no, this does not answer the question. What makes you think it is? — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 9 secs ago
This answer is wrong in the context of this question: there is no edit profile, that's the whole point... — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 54 secs ago
Hi Gween camino Gween, welcome to the Stack Exchange Network Meta site! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an expert's answer for the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — rene 18 secs ago
8:30 AM
So perhaps change the automated close message to something like "We've closed this ticket because it appears the issue was resolved and you did not respond to our previous message", to prevent such confusion as in this case, making it clear a previous message has been sent? — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 41 secs ago
8:54 AM
@ShadowWizardLoveZelda I thought the answer of the question I linked to explained how to change network profile details , etc. I actually tried to link to the answer and not the question. I think that's actually not how duplicate linking works, I guess. Learning every day! Thanks — PeterJames 25 secs ago
9:20 AM
@user1176409 this has nothing to do with you personally, that might have something to do with it. Some things you just don't know, that's normal and no reason to be embarrassed. — ingotangjingle 20 secs ago
@ElementsInSpace done: music.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4041/… I originally intended to post it on Music Meta. I posted by mistake here, probably while I was browsing other sites for existing answers. — user1079505 36 secs ago
Is there a question that has been deleted for it's quality? I have dozens that deleted for all kinds of reasons (which I'm not allowed to speak about or ask about), not one has mentioned quality of the question as the reason. I can't access other's deleted questions of course, so I can't be sure of every detail here. — ingotangjingle 36 secs ago
@ingotangjingle If you felt there’s something wrong with your deleted question(s)? Why don’t you use the ‘Contact Us’ in each sites? — user1176409 50 secs ago
@W.O. "I've never known staff to get involved with chat suspensions." - I know one case for sure. — Petəíŕd The Spring Wizard 7 secs ago
@user1176409 I can't discuss the close reasons, so there's 0 ways to know if there's anything wrong with them. (only clue I have are weird vague theories about my intentions, which I can'), I can't tell if there's anything wrong with them. Also, targeted harassment, insults, and vote manipulation have all resulted in no moderation action. — ingotangjingle 8 secs ago
Its literally in the Help Center that posts can be removed - under "What types of questions should I avoid asking?" — Journeyman Geek 44 secs ago
@JourneymanGeek the help center doesn't seem to have anything to do with the enforced rulings I have seen on this site. I would show examples, but doing so leads to closure of this post (for those same unclear reasons). That's why I'm asking if a post was ever removed for that reason. — ingotangjingle 51 secs ago
@ingotangjingle Then you should show it ( maybe show the link of some deleted questions), not only talk. Or else, this question maybe closed by “need details or clarifies”. — user1176409 23 secs ago
@user1176409 Doing so leads to post deletion, which is not my goal. Excellent attempt at baiting a response, though. — ingotangjingle 14 secs ago
Hi Mhd Afz, welcome to the Stack Exchange Network Meta site! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an expert's answer for the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — rene 49 secs ago
10:07 AM
Presumably you and the moderator disagree that the comment is off-topic. — Robert Longson 20 secs ago
10:30 AM
I've flagged this as "Blatantly off-topic" because it has nothing to do with the software that powers the Stack Exchange network. — JRN 31 secs ago
10:49 AM
@user1176409 thousands of posts get deleted every day on SE. Many times those who wrote them feel wronged. If each of them will send a support ticket for that, it will flood SE team and prevent real cases from being handled. Sorry but that is not a good advise at all. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 11 secs ago
11:09 AM
@ShadowWizardLoveZelda you're not allowed to as in meta what any close reason means. You can try this out yourself if you don't believe me. — ingotangjingle 10 secs ago
11:39 AM
@ShadowWizardLoveZelda meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/429909/… OP refers to this probably — πάντα ῥεῖ 28 secs ago
11:55 AM
@ingotangjingle the question was VLQ though. The close reasons are already explained well in the help center and FAQs. — πάντα ῥεῖ 6 secs ago
@ShadowWizardLoveZelda I don't understand the point of this lie? That post was asked after this one. — ingotangjingle 14 secs ago
This feels a little like an extended, off topic tangencial discussion dosen't it? — Journeyman Geek 59 secs ago
12:21 PM
Unless "actionable" means something different in US English, actionable feedback is the last thing anyone should give. — Chenmunka 54 secs ago
Hi Izzy, welcome to the Stack Exchange Network Meta site! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an expert's answer for the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — rene 32 secs ago
@user1176409 Given that you want vaguely, non-actionable feedback of "need more focus" on a singly quality-focused feature request, it is clear your intent is to troll on the comment section. I will disregard such disingenuous comments of yours and not believe you have any intent to help improve my post's quality or give honest feedback. You can regain this trust slowly by engaging in good faith, actionable feedback or editing the issues you have with the post. — ingotangjingle 37 secs ago
@Chenmunka "actionable feedback" is something I've seen used a lot to mean feedback you can apply to a work. For example, "I don't like this" is non-actionable, but "this part drones on too long" is actionable. — ingotangjingle 40 secs ago
I’m voting to close this question because this part drones on too long — Journeyman Geek 24 secs ago
12:50 PM
1 hour later…
1:58 PM
We used to do that on CR too. And then we ran into the issue that duplicates work quite differently on our site and while we don't encourage people to state tags in the title, sometimes adding a language is the easiest way of making the title coherent and unique at the same time. — Mast 17 secs ago
@W.O. the OP could also be the president of Uganda. This weird fascination in the person behind every post instead of the content itself is exactly the point in my post - Did you even read it? The irony is completely lost on you. — ingotangjingle 10 secs ago
2:26 PM
It happens again! In "Filtered Questions" very often the "newest" tab is empty and the "activity" tab lists questions or vice versa. When one tab is empty I switch to the other and I get results. It happens in Firefox and Edge as well. The results are consistently equal in both browsers. Why? The "My Favorite Tags Filter" settings are: 1) 12 tags included. 2) I'd like to include...: All Questions. 3) on...: All Sites. 4) Send email not checked. — Olivier Jacot-Descombes 24 secs ago
2:55 PM
...aand it's removed for a vague reason. "focus"? It uses basic "Premise A, Premise B, solution" structure. — ingotangjingle 32 secs ago
3:22 PM
Just my opinion, I think you should comment the previous post about your opinion, not asking a new question. — user1176409 59 secs ago
@user1176409 Unless you want to give actual feedback or answer the question, I will disregard your comment because the user behind it has shown repeatedly disingenious behavior in my comment sections. — ingotangjingle 1 min ago
3:48 PM
@user1176409 my reply disappeared (can't be flag removal because it was nearly verbatim what others have said) so I will reply to this again: You are being disingenuous and I will not interact with your posts unless you show better behavior. — ingotangjingle 26 secs ago
4:00 PM
@ingotangjingle No, when I asking questions, I’ll just trying to make the question straight to the point, NO ironic purpose. — user1176409 14 secs ago
Everything was well explained in the mod communication, and both users who followed the course of events or users with more than 10k rep are able to verify that the email is clear and faithfully matches what happened. So I believe it lacks focus because we don't know what you aim, or what the purpose of this post is, or what you expect us to do. It's sounds like a distorted rant about how things didn't turn out the way you'd hoped. — Augusto Vasques just now
@user1176409 this continued effort to troll does not help with being considered disingenuous — ingotangjingle 33 secs ago
@AugustoVasques "We should give actionable feedback in close reasons" is pretty clearly said three times across the post, once in title. — ingotangjingle 17 secs ago
It should now be mentioned that the OP is a known troll at Meta Stack Overflow, he has been banned multiple times there, and keeps asking vague and troll-like questions, not truthfully engaging with the community, and inventing and misinterpreting closure reasons, and seems that they are not doing the same in Meta SE. — Dr. Snoopy just now
Please, don’t repeat your question many times, I found that your question is all similar ones. The community would just continue closing your question, this question is definitely same to the previous question, trust me. — user1176409 16 secs ago
@user1176409 I will reply similarly as other users on this site: You are being disingenuous and I will not interact with your posts unless you repeatedly show better behavior. — ingotangjingle 9 secs ago
Does this answer your question? We should give actionable feedback in close reasons — user1176409 34 secs ago
A clear example is this (deleted) question meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/429909/… Where the OP misleads people into thinking that their level of English is not enough to understand the question, instead of engaging with the feedback in comments that the question is not understandable. — Dr. Snoopy 33 secs ago
@Dr.Snoopy If you were to truly believe I was a troll, weird personal attacks like these wouldn't make any sense: It's like calling a pot black. You're either trying to insult me, or discredit me to other people. neither has any value in this discussion. I have repeatedly stated I want to engage in discussion, if you do not believe my actions nor my words, then there is nothing else you can do except stop interacting with me. Is there a reason for why you haven't? — ingotangjingle 34 secs ago
I am just giving information to people here, about your past behavior, that seems to continue in Meta SE, as it is a waste of everyones time to answer to trolls. — Dr. Snoopy 18 secs ago
@user1176409 OP isn't listening to you or anyone else, it's a waste of time commenting on their questions, just ignore them. — F1Krazy 33 secs ago
@Dr.Snoopy you just did. You are interacting with a person you "believe" is a troll, because people shouldn't interact with troll's. If you actually believe what you're saying, then do not interact with my posts again. You said it yourself: You don't care about the content of my posts, you don't care about the quality of this site. That's fine. You don't have to. I do, that's why I ask these questions. You can leave the site, it's fine, nobody is going to judge you. — ingotangjingle 8 secs ago
@user1176409 so I will reply to this again: You are being disingenuous and I will not interact with your posts unless you show better behavior. — ingotangjingle 26 secs ago
The content of your posts and your comments are the evidence of trolling. And again you misinterpret what people write here, I just provide evidence of that for the future, basically revealing the troll :) — Dr. Snoopy 13 secs ago
@Dr.Snoopy didn't you say you shouldn't interact with trolls? At least try to convince others that you believe I am troll here. You could've stopped posting at any moment, but you keep doing it, you're still here, reading this. But you shouldn't, unless you lied about me being a troll. — ingotangjingle just now
Can't the use of this kind of lure, faking unfamiliarity with the language in order to force a situation of leniency on the part of the community towards the OP, be interpreted as a violation of the terms of conduct? — Augusto Vasques 17 secs ago
@AugustoVasques nobody has faked not knowing english, and nobody has asked for leniency. Isn't lying intentionally about others going against the tagline of the site: "Be nice?" Maybe don't do that in the future. — ingotangjingle 29 secs ago
Probably best for folks to just vote to close when there is a user who is trolling or fails to engage honestly — Rory Alsop 1 min ago
@RoryAlsop Yes, I just note that when questions get closed, the OP will open a new question, and this will repeat until banned. That has been the MO in Meta SO. — Dr. Snoopy 23 secs ago
@Dr.Snoopy other option is to answer the question instead of closing it. You know, interacting with the post. Answering questions, the intended way this site is used. — ingotangjingle 57 secs ago
4:36 PM
@AugustoVasques you asked what the purpose of the question was, I replied and explained where to find this information in the question itself. — ingotangjingle 17 secs ago
5:18 PM
Hi Arfan Shaikh, welcome to the Stack Exchange Network Meta site! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an expert's answer for the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — rene 24 secs ago
Maybe useful as start point: stackoverflow.com/questions/37863996/… among others: stackoverflow.com/search?q=%5Bt-sql%5D++all+week+numbers+range — rene 42 secs ago
5:57 PM
Upvoting this 12-year old request, because the fact that this was not implemented from the very beginning is a shame. — CPlus 44 secs ago
4 hours later…
9:46 PM
10:10 PM
Thanks! The previous question doesn't ask about warnings and doesn't ask about what mods can see by using mod tools. For the user part, the only answer is to write a script that scrapes your inbox for emails from mods. This suggests that the answer might be "No, users can't see a tally" but it's not explicate. Think I should edit the previous question or just leave his question as is? — phil1008 just now
10:37 PM
Leaving the question as if is fine as indeed you're asking also to get the list as a mod — Franck Dernoncourt 52 secs ago
11:19 PM
Hi KRT - Loouna, welcome to the Stack Exchange Network Meta site! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an expert's answer for the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — Journeyman Geek 38 secs ago
The text above says "Yes, all you have to do is go to your Gmail account and the warnings must be activated first" — Journeyman Geek 1 min ago
11:40 PM
Hi korean guy, welcome to the Stack Exchange Network Meta site! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an expert's answer for the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — Journeyman Geek 21 secs ago
« first day (333 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (26 days later) »
Transcript for
Apr20
Apr21
Apr22
♦ Meta Stack Exchange Comment Archive
A comprehensive archive of all Meta Stack Exchange Comments. C...
