Hi Alumeo, welcome to the Stack Exchange Network Meta site! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an expert's answer for the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — Journeyman Geek 17 secs ago

Please start by taking the tour and reading through the help center, and keep in mind that this is not a discussion forum. — Karl Knechtel 32 secs ago

If you wanted to ask on Ask Different, use that site. (If you get a message that says you are not allowed to post there, please read the link that would be given to you - here it is again, for reference). You may not bring a question about Apple hardware here in order to work around a question ban, because you are being ignored on the proper site, or for any other reason. This place is for asking about Stack Exchange itself. — Karl Knechtel 33 secs ago

Does this answer your question? Which computer science / programming Stack Exchange sites do I post on? — Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog 44 secs ago

@Carog Ah, yes, I see. The reduced gray color along the top and bottom edges made the text appear perceptibly smaller when it wasn't actually so. — Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog just now

"with our setup including a proprietary Audio recording software" - have you tried contacting the authors of the software? — Karl Knechtel 50 secs ago

As of now, this seemed to have been fixed. Thanks to the team working behind. — User1865345 1 min ago

How come people answer in the comments like this, instead of using the "Answer Question" button? — timelessbeing 39 secs ago

That's because answers consisting only or mostly of just links are not considered proper answers. — Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog just now

even if the link answers the question really well? — timelessbeing 39 secs ago

@timelessbeing Indeed. Answers should be self contained, and not just a copy-paste of an external site(see: Copyright violation). — Daedalus 25 secs ago

so if the answer is 5 pages long, it's better to type it out in one's own words than just post a link to an article that may have done a better job? Not all sites are copyright protected. — timelessbeing 8 secs ago

@timelessbeing generally, one would summarize the key aspects of the answer to make it self-contained, while linking to the original source. That way the full details should be available, but the answer stands on its own in the event of link rot. You can certainly also quote sections from a source but 5 pages is very excessive — fyrepenguin just now

Understood. Thank you. — timelessbeing 7 secs ago

Does this answer your question? New Focus Styles & Updated Styling for Button Groups — Elements In Space 53 secs ago

Reloading the page seems to fix the problem — Quack E. Duck 39 secs ago

Since triage is SO only - I feel like this would be a better fit for MSO? — Journeyman Geek 11 secs ago

Hi Lee213, welcome to the Stack Exchange Network Meta site! I'm not sure which search brought you here but the problem you describe will not be answered on this specific site. To get an expert's answer for the topic of your question you'll have to find and then re-post on the proper site. Check How do I ask a good question and What is on topic on the target site to make sure your post is in good shape. Your question is definitely off-topic on Meta and is better deleted here. — Journeyman Geek 53 secs ago

I wasn't sure whether the issue affected anything else (I haven't attempted to reproduce it in any other queues yet), but assumed an issue like this wouldn't be site-specific. If it is, should I delete this question and re-ask it there instead? — Quack E. Duck 59 secs ago

OK, now the same thing just happened in the First Questions queue too (also on SO). — Quack E. Duck 13 secs ago

Just reproduced it on ELL First Questions queue - it looks like it is network-wide — Quack E. Duck just now

Aha, those little triangles are selectable via the 'tab' key... could the issue be related to this? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/398704/… If so I'd imagine it'll be fixed soon — Quack E. Duck 31 secs ago

Could you update the broader issue on the main post please? Comments are just so easily overlooked. — Journeyman Geek 15 secs ago

@JourneymanGeek Triage is on Physics too, so this is indeed related to multiple sites and thus on-topic. — Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog 38 secs ago

Does this provide any benefit over catch-all solutions like darkreader? darkreader.org — Mast 46 secs ago

@JourneymanGeek I'll do that now :) — Quack E. Duck 9 secs ago

@Mast nothing significant. and my thing has flashing issues on new tabs before the userscript loads. I also don't do anything to handle human light sensitivity differences between dark and light. but it's somewhat easy to configure contrast and brightness. It kind of only exists because I wasn't really interested in extension hunting, and was interested in trying out an idea. — starball 13 secs ago

As someone who has encountered the exact same situation, and almost asked this question last month, I'll give you +1 :) — Quack E. Duck 48 secs ago

@slate. Thanks for the clarification. Might I suggest editing your post to clarify (and perhaps avoid detracting focus) then? I suggest rewriting to mirror your first comment under my post, as it would much better represents what I think you're trying to get across (with less distraction) — theforestecologist 13 secs ago

This is a question and answer network, not for random inchoate utterings. — W.O. 7 secs ago

It's impacted multiple queue on SO, I made a post on SO here about this issue — Elikill58 20 secs ago

Additionally, comments can be deleted anytime without a trace. — Jeanot Zubler 30 secs ago

That too - but that even involves finding the question first. I'm not sure comments are going to be picked up by a search engine as effectively as an answer — Journeyman Geek 26 secs ago

If the question didn't had an answer from another user before, it won't have an answer afterward. If the OP found their solution but could not care to post it because the site feels unrewarding and not worth their time writing long answers for 1-2 votes max. then their knowledge won't be lost either way since they never shared it with you. I'll be honest: I have some old unanswered questions that I found the answer since, but I can't care to self answer since no one showed any interest and I would kinda love the mockery to be able to mark them as solved without positing the answer... — SPArcheon 59 secs ago

If OP asks, OP would do it if they know its ok to. Someone feeling burnt out over the site is a whole different set of issues. I can relate but I don't feel like that's the case here. I occationally (ab)use SE and SE chat for documenting stuff simply cause I'm familiar with the format, it helps me collect my thoughts and its fairly easy to search through my own posts. I don't ever post answers for the upvotes. I've past me has occasionally saved future me a lot of time — Journeyman Geek just now

Users will proudly teach you that "you should write a self answer". Yet... I perfectly get where you come from: you took time to write a good question yet not only no one answered it, no one even deemed it worth a vote (I mean, you don't want to help a rival climbing the Top Site Heroes League and steal your non-existent prizes) so... why should you bother posting the answer now? I get the idea that you should just post to help and not to gain fake point... but let's be honest: the gamification is there for a reason to make you feel appreciated. +1 even if your proposal is mostly a provocation — SPArcheon 23 secs ago

yet if you notice you just basically admitted that you are doing that because it is useful for you, not because of simple philanthropy. I never said I see that feature as something the site would implement. I just said that I can perfectly understand the reasoning - you felt unappreciated when you still needed help so you don't care to share now that you got you answer yourself. — SPArcheon 25 secs ago

Short version: it is easy to see these posts as an opportunity to proudly educate users and get easy votes because one posted the popular answer (and sadly for some that is "you wrong, learn kiddo, imma better" just disguised as "let's me teach you") but I am starting to thing that if would be more productive to realize that if these rants keep coming back then maybe the system isn't that great and all perfect instead of just scrubbing them off as "uneducated users" — SPArcheon 30 secs ago

This is already requested: Allow cross-site duplicate closing — Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog 47 secs ago

@Piper thanks, and a side note: your network profile is not synched with the other profiles, I see there were some changes, that aren't reflected there. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 33 secs ago

mechanics.stackexchange.com there is this one, no idea what the scope of it is though. — Warcupine 29 secs ago

@Warcupine is correct, that site has engine tag, design tag, and vehicle identification tag. But first better read their tour page, and browse it a bit before posting new questions. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 37 secs ago

Actually, I have no idea why is this question related to the tag edit? — user1176409 21 secs ago

As I promised the other week we would be posting about upcoming initiatives. meta.stackexchange.com/questions/398734/… — Rosie ♦ just now

I linked to the Staging Ground and OverflowAI Alpha posts that went live today. I'll link to posts on the other initiatives as they go live in the future and note the update so this post. — Rosie ♦ 10 secs ago

Do you read the question properly? I have read your answer, but don’t know why is it related to the question. — user1176409 18 secs ago

I know the specific announcement has been made yet, but I'm curious which cloud provider you are going with? AWS? Azure? GCP? — TylerH 16 secs ago

@TylerH The previous announcement (the question associated with the first link in Rosie's post) read "...to provide Stack Overflow content directly within Google Cloud"; I guess that does not explicitly answer your question but anything else would be quite a surprise. — Bryan Krause 17 secs ago

@BryanKrause Oh, that's a good point--I agree it would be a little surprising if they integrated w/ Google Cloud for AI but not for hosting. Then again, it's surprising they're moving away from their own industry-leading on-premises infrastructure, so... — TylerH 11 secs ago

You're making this announcement on the network meta, but link to posts on SO meta. That calls for a short word on the way these initiatives are going to spread from SO to the wider network. — ccprog 14 secs ago

@ccprog Some initiatives, such as Staging Ground, are starting with Stack Overflow. It’s the largest and most active site on the network, so we often start there. However, we always do so with an eye on the larger network to see if there is value in new features rolling out across Stack Exchange. Some initiatives, such as the Product Advisory Council (working with community managers and the product team) will be network-wide, not just limited to Stack Overflow. — Rosie ♦ 45 secs ago

Do you know about the Association Bonus? Doesn't that already solve this issue? — Laurel 26 secs ago

"I am a troll period and that should be taken into account." Huh, what please?? — πάντα ῥεῖ 49 secs ago

You're not trustable at StackOverflow, because your netwirk wide score is to low and you apparently didn't post any useful content there. — πάντα ῥεῖ 41 secs ago

we are not discriminating against AI, just not letting plagiarizers to roam freely on our network. It's not their answer, question, comment, etc. They haven't done anything besides copy and pasting from here to there and vice versa. Aside from all the other valid concerns regarding practicality of reviewing such posts, I just do not understand why we should have a conversation about whether copy and pasting content should be allowed or not?!!! — M-- 12 secs ago

@M-- sorry, there used to be many comments but everything got removed, so I'm not commenting anymore. — Franck Dernoncourt 1 min ago

This is wrong for many reasons, but the major reason is that reputation has nothing to do with trust, in the basic level. It's given per-post. There is a bonus of 100 reputation, given on all sites once you reach 200 in a single site, and that's enough to get the basic privileges. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 6 secs ago

Sounds too complicated. — Kevin B 48 secs ago

@KevinB technically? Not really, there are already cross site jobs running, so when getting upvote it's possible, in theory, to add 1 rep on all other sites. Downvotes would be more tricky, e.g. taking 1 reputation down on all sites for every two downvotes you get on one site. Still, that's surely not the reason to object to this request, IMO. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 37 secs ago

@FranckDernoncourt no worries. I was actually surprised to see no one had mentioned that aspect here. And, kinda more surprised that your proposal on Android.SE is welcomed positively. But I, too, wouldn't be eager to reopen can of worms after 15 months or so. Cheers (will delete this comment shortly). — M-- 40 secs ago

I think modifying the association bonus is not necessary. — user16217248 39 secs ago

What would be complicated is clearly indicating to users where their rep is coming from/going. Not only to the users themselves, but others who view their profile. — Kevin B 35 secs ago

@KevinB well yes, when seeing user with no activity and no other accounts but with 101 reputation, it's usually due to reputation bonus on a hidden site. So that won't be very different. — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 57 secs ago

100, one time, is much easier to explain than a weekly or daily +n phantom rep — Kevin B 24 secs ago

Given the context of the article, by onboarding, are you primarily referring to this thing (that currently can't be publicly discussed), or are you looking at the actual sources of onboarding problems, particularly wrt. lack of information to new users regarding the function of the sites and the network? I really, really want to be optimistic, but the blog post exclusively focuses on a minor change related to the thing that can't be discussed yet, which isn't actually an onboarding strategy that's meaningful; it's just a bump in signups — Zoe is on strike 16 secs ago

which isn't going to solve any of the multiple classes of onboarding problems we have. It'll look good to shareholders, but not solve any actual onboarding problems — Zoe is on strike 37 secs ago

Great news! Glad to hear you're re-committing focus on human knowledge sharing. However, from the linked blog post: "There was a sense of optimism regarding Stack Overflow’s AI entry and in remaining a valuable resource for technologists." I can't find evidence of this assertion. There's a +81/-117 score on the OverflowAI search post and the overwhelmingly top-voted answer doesn't sound remotely optimistic to me. Same for just about any other AI-related proposal I've seen on the network. — ggorlen 24 secs ago

Couldn't decide between feature-request or bug, went with bug. Also not sure if this has been reported before. I did a quick search but couldn't find anything. — Cave Johnson 25 secs ago

It goes away when clicking anywhere outside, which I think is the expected behavior. Do you have example of such a popup that close when just tabbing out, without mouse click? (Or touch screen tap.) — Shadow Wizard Love Zelda 28 secs ago

Does this answer your question? Close search "help" box on unfocus — wizzwizz4 54 secs ago

@ShadowWizardLoveZelda Sure, the vote buttons and other icons below it (for the vote buttons you have to focus on it for a second for the tooltip to appear). I think for accessibility purposes they should close when tabbing out. — Cave Johnson 27 secs ago

I didn't notice this answer when I submitted this bug report. But it turns out the search tooltip not going away was reported a while ago. — Cave Johnson 58 secs ago

I’m voting to close this question because it is an extremely old question asked back when oneboxing support had just been introduced. Much like with announcements with feedback answers asked a long time ago, new requests are better made as new questions rather than as answers here. — Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog 25 secs ago

It's a deliberate choice to not allow such links: Links with URIs of schemes other than http/https are broken — Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog 49 secs ago

@iBugsaysReinstateMonica Neither, as you never reviewed/voted on the audit. It just makes you ineligible to vote on the audit. — user16217248 51 secs ago

Note that a while ago, comments used to not be allowed to be posted from the low quality review queue - a few years ago, they began to be allowed, but I think that script isn't loaded because it was a relatively recent change. — Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog 7 secs ago

@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog I reproduced this for other queues such as First Questions, First Answers, and Late Answers too. — user16217248 24 secs ago

This is a long standing request, but cites having custom designs makes it a pretty big ask. Plans for dark mode for all Stack Exchange sites. — zcoop98 38 secs ago

Does this answer your question? Dark Mode for Stack Exchange sites — Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog 1 min ago

so you're telling everyone to install a userstyle/userscript to change their SO font? — starball 47 secs ago

Is this even still an issue? This is an old question from when SE had a mobile view. The mobile view was removed and responsive theme took over. In the responsive theme I don't see symbols, but instead words are used (e.g. "Prev", "Next"). — Cave Johnson 1 min ago