« first day (521 days earlier)      last day (4503 days later) » 

Anonymous
12:07 AM
 
Anonymous
This was random enough that I clicked it just to see who'd post such an ad; I guess that's a success.
 
12:35 AM
Didn't you post that already?
Ah, no. It was Tim Stone.
Jan 1 at 3:09, by Tim Stone
user image
Jan 1 at 3:09, by Tim Stone
...Congratulations, Doris?
 
1:09 AM
@JeremyBanks Hahah, I felt exactly the same way.
 
1:41 AM
Hmm, seems the fading-on-focus text in the Ask Question title field can now be implemented in Chrome with input:focus::-webkit-input-placeholder. All the other browsers still clear the placeholder text on focus, though.
 
@TimStone The shadow DOM is weird
They really need to standardize it
 
Yeah :/
 
 
13 hours later…
2:49 PM
Are any Stack Exchange site a world apart, or should Drupal Answers moderators need to read what reported in Meta Stack Overflow about flagging a post with a custom reason to flag all the comments for that post that are obsolete?
0
Q: How does flagging a post for removing all the obsolete comments not require a moderator?

kiamlalunoI have flagged an answer because the comments for that answers were made obsolete from the edit done to the question, and the consequent edit done to that answer. As suggested on Meta Stack Overflow, as there were more than 4 comments to delete (excluding mine, but I can deal with them), and the ...

 
3:03 PM
@kiamlaluno It's my understanding that communities are free to set their own policies as they see fit (within limits), although ideally if there's a general consensus on Meta about how certain things should work on the network as a whole moderators will be sure to make themselves aware of that and consider those recommendations in their own community.
Of course, I'm not a moderator of any community, so it's possible that my understanding is incorrect. :)
 
 
1 hour later…
4:07 PM
@TimStone That is what I thought too. I find silly to ask a question on the meta site just to remove all the comments for a question, or flag each single comment one by one. That means the moderators would get 9 flags instead of one.
(If the comments are nine.)
 
 
7 hours later…
10:53 PM
rages at Chrome
 
11:22 PM
Who can accept an answer on a community wiki question? Only the original asker?
 
Only the asker, yeah.
 
That's what I thought, was thinking it'd be an idea to let moderators accept/unaccept answers for CW questions since they're supposed to be community owned. I've seen it happen a couple of times where a connonical answer is wanted to a common question or a poor answer is accepted where a mod might want to overturn it to help future users
I don't know if that'd be encouraging "weaponizing community wiki" though
 
Yeah, I'd suspect that wouldn't go over too well.
The idea of letting moderators accept answers on behalf of users has been received pretty negatively in the past, and in some sense that'd be the same request, only with the additional moderator-only step of converting to community wiki first (ignoring questions auto-converted by the system).
 
11:37 PM
It did seem a better way of going about the "canonical answer" people have also requested, removes the bloat of extra buttons/voting and such
 

« first day (521 days earlier)      last day (4503 days later) »