user3342816

With markup I think of things like HTML and XML, markdown I think of things like * for bullet-point. I might be wrong

It's not markup but markdown btw.

For me it is more a control and fine-tuning thing + that it works very well. All OK for newbies, but from my experience people learn from the start or one comment or two. The rich editor thing is a Frontpage resurrection. Any human able to compose a question is able to learn the simple markdown. It does not take much.

Have not bothered debugging it in dev-tools as I thought it might be a common thing.

@KevinB Yes, that was what I thought, but again wondered if there perhaps was something form the horrendous (no offense intended, but personal opinion 😅) alpha thing bleeding trough.

markdown

Thought the edit area was simply treated as a html textarea. Is there some JS jumble going on here?

I.e. If I use down arrow from line 1. it land on line 3. If I use up arrow on line 3 I land on line 1.

Curious as to this: Have noticed lately that if I add for example 3 lines and use up/down arrow it is very hard to land on the middle line. It is very frustrating in the moment as I can not add a new paragraph between two others without doing a big dance with adding lines, deleting lines text, etc.

Was only expanding on the topic about screen capturing at the time. Sorry for the noise.

@Rob I was merely talking more in general about screen-shot tools.

@Luuklag Nice. Have to test it out. The "Powerful editors" is the biggest pt from what I have (though it would be simple enough to incorporate in my script as well). IIRC I found that best for met is silent save as it's only 1 in 50 times I actually edit the picture.

I'm always up for good alternatives. The way I use it is PrintScr => Save entire desktop and save as picture, Shift+PrintScr => Get selection tool on mouse, save as area, Ctrl+PrintScr => Save desktop + copy to clipboard, Ctrl+Shift+PrintScr => Get selection, save as file + copy to clipboard. Alt+PrintScr => Window to saved file, Alt+Ctrl+PrintScr => Window saved as file + picture copied to clipboard.

@Rob That's geared towards sharing sites? I use gnome-screenshot (on KDE none the less) as it has proven to be good (and I came from GNOME).

One could do trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Capture/Desktop but then you have to a bit more geeky in regards to selection of area.

That is the GUI. Simply resize and / or move to desired spot and record.

It's a really nice piece of software.

Perhaps because I'm on 18.04 and X. apt-cache show peek , dpkg -l peek - but, as said, if on Wayland perhaps moot.

X11 ftw :D

Unless you are on Wayland of course, in which case I doubt it is usable.

darn. These scroll gifs are annoying lol.

But in my case also in apt

github.com/phw/peek

@user1271772 try peek

Nice. So my home made drone warning system made form old micro waves is good going.

Does unshielded magnetron count?

Biggest issue is when someone past a transparent picture with black text (pixels) - they do not render well.

termbin.com/5ocd , makes for some quirky pictures and colors in various places - but works for my use :P

I have dark-mode enabled on various sites using a very simple filter CSS. (Only) issue is the breaking of positioning.

Thought of this: stackoverflow.com/q/52937708/3342816

Because of sticky

I read “rearguing” as “regurgitating” - sigh

I'm fatigued as of late as well - so that does not help when trying to rationalize heh.

tbh. I also do not care about the rationale behind why - only that there is a lot of various reasons, and I try not to judge as long as it is not spying. That said I also think protecting against tracking is important. I also see the point of enabling bad patterns trough enabling, - but in a compromise like way lower granularity I think it a lot of it would be eliminated anyway. A problem with the issue is that there are so many special cases that are hard to generalize.

@KevinB Yes. At the time of posting it was part of the make it light thought.

It feels like a to late, let it be, thing.

OK. So I feel like I made a boo boo in meta.stackexchange.com/q/368870/497683 - at the time of posting I meant for it to be lightweight and somewhat humorous in tone, but reading it now it does just look messy. In part the entire Conspiracy theory part does not come across as intended heh. But, as I see it, it is not much I can do about it at this stage. Just leave it?

Is the beta «Stack editor» only a test and see, or planned to be implemented? Tested it for a few seconds, but ouch. Nope :D