@RyanM 😳 Don't know why I didn't see the line one before the one I quoted; found that line by searching for "network", and it was the only match on the page. --- It does go on to say that it acts like "report"; which says: "The originator of each post will be added to the blacklist if the post wouldn't have been caught otherwise. Maximum 5 posts at a time.".
So it's a network wide search, for a maximum of 5 posts?, all of which are per-site blacklisted.
@RyanM The hypothetical (unavailable) network wide blacklist that @Ollie asked about would involve one additional API call each time, while the "allspam" involves probably a couple to get setup and a minimum of 5 plus a couple more calls all at once - certainly more than what Ollie suggested (but all at once). --- Were there accounts without posts it would simply try again until it had 5 successes, it's also possible to run the command a second time, skipping everything that's already
been caught and continuing until another 5 successes are attempted.
I'd have to look at the code, and I dislike doing that on a cellphone screen while holding a magnifying glass. 😵
If they had 10 rep 1 accounts and only wrote one spam on one site (and had no other posts) the "rules" wouldn't justify manually blacklisting them on the other 9 sites - so "allspam" doesn't reallylose it limits itself to what we should limit ourselves to if we did each site manually; except it simply marks everything bad regardless of content, much like manual report (and subsequent "... this post wouldn't be caught otherwise ..." messages).