I don't wanna make it sound like I'm beefing you up about it or anything but like... I dunno. If there was a way to answer that question... I think that one's it, to be honest.
> If you are sincerely looking for help understanding a situation, please avoid using terminology that escalates the situation and puts people on the defensive - it generally leads to people reacting negatively. It's a self-fulfilling action.
I've removed the specific comments about your suspension for a variety of reasons but mostly because they're unnecessary and making assumptions that aren't based in reality.
I'll say another thing... and this isn't about tone policing but "vote bombing" is a very charged term. The general term we...
@Catija - since you handle HNQ features, I wonder which way would be more convenient for you. This is about that 2% parameter, you probably saw recent MSE posts about it. First I wanted to make FR to change it, then I got lost in how it works and instead asked for explanation, and some time later I figured it myself and self-answered. Now I'm back to request for changing it but can't make my mind whether it would be better to "convert" my initial question to feature request or post it separately
^^^ I am looking for what's better as a matter of "bookkeeping" - don't intend insisting on implementation. Before asking here I also tried to figure which way I would prefer myself walking in your shoes but ended up uncertain
@gnat Considering you've self-answered your question, won't changing the question invalidate the answer? It really sounds like you have a follow-up question.
MSE is a little too eager about duplicates IMO , so your mileage may vary with the question-FR referencing your question-explaination
the ideal time would be when its a topic SE is actively working on, and as such can be status-reviewed,
but of course, that involves waiting, and that its actually something in the queue
since its your own Q/A pair, you might edit, move the information from the current answer at present and change it into a question, and hope no one gets too grumpy
@Mast that's a good point and initially I simply wanted to make a straight follow-up feature request (possibly even dupe-closing my first question having newer as a target, to help readers see the connection - @JourneymanGeek). But when drafting that future follow up I noticed that it can be rather smoothly incorporated into my original Q&A, without invalidating the answer. It just turned difficult to decide which way would work better, that's why I asked here
@JourneymanGeek you mean, if the question gets converted to feature request? In this case the prior answer would work as an auxiliary note / data point regarding the request. I saw this many time at meta how people post such answers with reasoning for or against proposed change, if memory serves we even had discussion at MSE where this was quite thoroughly covered. Such answers per se are routine thing, it is just that "conversion" from support question to feature request seem to be rare
indeed, scope change has to be the reason. And this is possibly also why I consider this for my question, because as I mentioned there was a scope change in it already. I first planned it as FR (first half of the question is just a copy from that FR draft). It was only after I discovered that I coudn't understand some important things about feature, I modified it and changed scope into asking for explanation
If you leave the current question as-is, regardless of whether your request is fulfilled, it may be a good target for potential future questions to dupe against.
I am not going to radically change it anyway (as I mentioned, stuff I drafted so far seems to merge quite smoothly), so it most probably would remain suitable for dupe target after conversion as well
I've a feeling I've commented on that before, and my conclusion is they probably use a single template like "Votes cast by those with less than {rep_to_vote}..."
> Thanks for the feedback! Votes cast by those with less than $repRequired$ [reputation]($link$) are recorded, but do not change the publicly displayed post score.
Since I work from home and wife doesn't, she has the most burden, having three children cling to her all day long... still, it backfires at me as well.
@Ollie The First Posts and Late Answers review queues don't exist on Meta, so the lowest rep review queues are Suggested Edits and Low Quality Posts, both of which require 2,000 rep, the same on the other sites.
@DavidPostill well, it was posted when it was still July 20 for me (or early night of the 21st), and the two weeks are from last contact with the infected person, which turned out to be at Sunday, July 19th, at 4 PM. :)
I should have said started, not starting, perhaps. ;)
I want to ask if there is a site where users "unjustly" banned from forums/casinos/etc., congregate to potentially help each other; a "banned user union" of sorts. Would this question be appropriate for Community Building, Interpersonal Skills, Software Recommendations, Super User, or Web Applications?