Did something change on dupehammers and retags? I just tagged a Q per the OP comment and then found a dupe. I wasn't expecting it to close immediately but it did
@ShadowTheDragonWizard Though you might want to click the link from the comment there, and point out that here, it looks at the original tags because Machavity seems to have added the php tag... and the meta linked there says:
> First, we now look at the question's current tags instead of its original tags, unless you were the one that edited them (either by doing it yourself, or by approving an edit from someone else).
We have made two changes to closure by users that own a gold badge:
First, we now look at the question's current tags instead of its original tags, unless you were the one that edited them (either by doing it yourself, or by approving an edit from someone else).
This is done to address the req...
Update: this is now enabled everywhere!
The rules are:
You can instantly close as a duplicate any question that was originally asked with a tag you have a gold badge for.
You can instantly reopen any question closed as a duplicate that was originally asked with a tag you have a gold badge for....
Starting work again next Monday though. And I made the mistake of planning a dentist appointment six months ago thinking I'd be working, so I have to get there at 8 this Wednesday :/
@ShadowTheDragonWizard No? I think it worked exactly like that answer I linked describes. Php tag was originally there. Then edited out. Then Machivity edits one back in. But because Machavity edits one back in, the system doesn't look at the tags Machavity edited in, but at the original ones.
So it doesn't look at original tags to start with, only if you edit the tags does it do that.
It's also not as simple as 'it was there originally' as the system no longer does 'You can instantly close as a duplicate any question that was originally asked with a tag you have a gold badge for.'
I haven't quite figured it out earlier, but I know it simply checks to see if you added in the tag. For this reason, I edited the FAQ to say "within limits that prevent gaming the system".
Some of you might be thinking of original tags because for a small period of time, the check categorically checked solely for original tags without considering future retags, but a couple months later, it was changed to the one Shog quoted.
It's also worth noting that until that was clarified in June 2018, the official statement from the team misstated that dupehammering is "disabled if you edited the tags".
they're smart enough to know which rooms humans are in, complain when my mom dosen't play music, and I've seen about a dozen gang up and dive bomb a crow.
The information was collected, naturally, by scraping the profiles. I found myself blocked really fast when I used bs4 or such, but running a loop in browser's console with 1 request per second seemed agreeable.
The list of profiles to visit was the list of Marshals from SEDE.
> in order for the election to proceed, we need to have at least as many candidates as there are slots (so, 2) — that way, as mentioned in the original announcement, we can have a non-competitive election.
I don't follow. A non-competitive election with 1 candidate for 2 slots is also possible.