« first day (3299 days earlier)      last day (1715 days later) » 

12:17 AM
21 messages moved to Chimney
 
12:35 AM
5 messages moved to Chimney
 
 
1 hour later…
2:01 AM
@JNat Cross-site spammer: stackexchange.com/users/15568078/ethan (cc @ShaWiz)
 
2:36 AM
feeds.boingboing.net/~r/boingboing/iBag/~3/pjJWqwKlTrA/… nothing ever really changes. Other than well, coin phones... ;p
 
 
2 hours later…
5:03 AM
Ahh Thanks to SE. Is this on topic ? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/332296/…
 
-4
Q: Stack Overflow is not trying to start audio

Juan MAfter a thorough investigation and inquiry, we were able to get an update on this. The ads in question were not intending to start audio but were rather checking to see if there was an audio player present as part of a bot/fraud detection system. For those who might still be wondering about the a...

oh my god
Is this really excusing the malicious ads?
I was told that work was done to prevent this from happening again.
Now there are two conflicting messages from two people who are both staff.
One saying that this is a severe problem and that they are not OK with it.
Another saying that it's totally fine and doesn't break any laws.
 
Well - could be both.
 
Oh shit, I totally forgot about not linking to questions in here that I answer.
 
Its not a haxxor. Just the usual ad companies trying everything possible to remain profitable in an environment that they don't quite understand why things don't work wonderfully and everyone is happy to see their ads and somehow no one ever would do the sort of things they themselves might happily do
 
It's actually not usual, although it's not extremely unusual. It's a bad business practice.
 
5:15 AM
But nothing stops SE from working on and assisting browser vendors to work on adding stuff that mitigates the worst of it
@forest you mean there's ad companies that don't go above and beyond to ensure that their ads are seen, and seen by human eyeballs so they get paid? ;p
 
I still find it amusing that any post I make gets instantly downvoted, but only if I post it near you. :^)
 
causation isn't correlation.
 
@JourneymanGeek Well, there are ad companies that are both malicious and non-malicious.
 
I've honestly never seen any one that I trust
 
Other way around. Correlation is not causation.
 
5:17 AM
Well, whatever.
 
Just a nitpick lol
 
I don't go around downvoting things cause I disagree. Posting scathing answers/comments is much more entertaining.
 
I know you've told me not to distrust staff or accuse them of anything, but I seriously find it excruciatingly difficult to give staff the benefit of the doubt when I see posts like that.
 
@forest in this situation I think what nick says might have a lot more weight
and not just with SE
or SO or whatever
 
I really, truly hope so.
 
5:19 AM
So "The ad's not malicious"
 
Because as an infosec person, browser fingerprinting is the bane of my existence.
You have no idea how much sensitive information is leaked and stolen due to that shit.
It's a very creepy feeling seeing someone sell detailed information on 100,000 children's browsing habits, knowing that they got it all from sketchy fingerprinting ads that they managed to hack.
 
vs "Oh, the heck with this. I don't like it - and while we're not going to nuke it right now, we'd like people to keep complaining, and we will try to do things that keep our users safe"
And while I like the CMs, and I do think they have a pretty critical role - they're primarily messengers here.
On the other hand, the stuff you hear from the SRE team probably has a git commit or three lined up ;p
 
I'm not sure which is which.
 
sigh
You do know what Nick does right?
 
Nope. I have no clue who he is.
 
5:23 AM
I mean, that's a very serious question
ah
 
Remember, I don't spend that much time on Meta.
 
Drat the lack of staff page
 
I'm on Information Security and Cryptography 99.5% of the time.
 
Oh, that's normal
As per his profile...
 
I see two people labeled staff. One person says it's a very bad thing and they're working to fix it, and that, in bold, they're not OK with this. Then I see another staff come in with an update repeating a lie that was told to them by the ad company (does he really thing it's fraud detection? That's not what AudioContext fingerprinting is for) and that what they're doing is technically legal, so it won't stop.
 
5:24 AM
@forest as per his profile...
> I am the Architecture Lead for Stack Overflow. My day job consists of being a Developer, Site Reliability Engineer, and DBA. I design and build very fast things in hopes of making life easier for millions of developers.
So pretty much - he's the person who actually at the very least directs the implementation of the stuff he talks about
 
Who is Juan then? Does he have more power than Nick?
 
If so, why is Nick saying that this is totally OK and that they'll keep doing this fingerprinting?
 
Lemme try to remember what they call that team
 
Is he just stepping out of line, or is this the final, official response?
 
5:27 AM
But basically If memory serves, and someone will correct me, he's kinda in charge of the team of folks whose main job is, well, interacting with us
Cat and Caesar work with him
But he's probably be asking the Ad team (which is its own team) who would go "eh... we'll check"
Annoyingly I don't remember how the CM team is laid out these days :/
 
ah
So he's not the one in charge of actually determining if malvertising is permitted on SE?
 
Ah, language
Malvertising?
 
It's a term for malicious advertising, such as using fingerprinting to track users cross-session.
 
He's not the one who is in charge of determining the nature and source of ads on SE
@forest do note how much less.... aggressive that sounds.
 
Malvertising is a specific term in the trade. It's not meant to sound aggressive or passive.
 
5:30 AM
He is however the person who probably can talk to the ad team especially if we start seeing, I donno porno ads and... get them to set them on fire
 
But it's Nick who is in charge of preventing ads from doing malicious things?
 
No
He's in charge of the team of folks that do the sysadminny and dbish things
 
Yeah then I'm still confused as to what SE's official stance is.
 
but he's probably the person who can go "Eh, we need safe-frame and feature-policy" and write the stuff
 
Fingerprinting ads to bypass security controls: allowed by SE or not?
 
5:32 AM
or get someone to write the stuff
 
@JourneymanGeek Well, the purpose of fingerprinting is to bypass those controls. :P
They're pretty much impossible to prevent.
 
@forest well, we don't have those things now
And honestly, if you're worried about fingerprinting, shouldn't you just treat all ad-like things as hostile, and treat them like mushrooms?
 
Sure, and those things would help with some things (so ads couldn't keylog for example), but it wouldn't do anything about fingerprinting, which is what people are so upset about.
Oh I'm not worried about it personally. I have that all disabled.
But that doesn't mean that I don't think it's an incredibly malicious thing to allow.
@SmokeDetector No, I am not looking for varicose veins treatment in Dubai. Thanks for asking!
:p
I wonder how bad it would look for Stack Exchange if someone managed to hack that ad company and published a massive fingerprint database of all users with extreme details about their computer.
It's something they're seriously risking. Though most likely it wouldn't be published. :/
 
If you did it responsibly?
It would likely get a good enough response
 
Oh no if I did it I'd just put it on some pastebin along with some ASCII art.
 
5:37 AM
eh
might work too
 
Probably. I can almost guarantee it'd get SE to change their stance about malvertising.
But... I'm lazy. I'd probably need to get paid to want to pop an ad distributor.
"Against site policy" lol jk we allow it now :^)
 
5:56 AM
4 messages moved to Chimney
 
How come there isn't a bot to automatically move to Chimney?
 
cause you need RO powers
and the script, well... kinda sometimes dosen't do all of it
wordpress.se's 404 page is adorable
 
lol wow I got suspended for 30 minutes for using the f-word.
I keep forgetting to be more cautious when you're in the same rooms. :p
(Unless that's correlation and not causation as well. dunno)
Amusing though that it only happens if I'm also criticizing SE policies, but not if I use it to criticize the policies of any other company. Now that at least isn't just coincidence. Oh well.
@JourneymanGeek I recall you (or someone else) telling me that words like the f-word are acceptable (when used sparingly) on the network in chat if they are not used as an insult (e.g. "I f'ed up" is ok, but "f you" is not). Is that not correct? Is there an official policy I can read to show it's flat-out disallowed?
 
@forest Oh it isn't
I try to ignore them, but SOME PEOPLE NEED TO RUIN IT FOR EVERYONE DON'T THEY
 
Isn't acceptable or isn't flat-out disallowed?
 
6:05 AM
Its disallowed
 
Huh, I've even seen staff use it. Never flagged it because I always assumed they'd ban me.
Hm... since it's likely a user flag, is the f-word automatically detected by the system, or does it guarantee that someone active in the room has flagged it? You said you ignore them so assuming you're telling the truth (I've never known you to flat out lie), that means it must be another person?
 
gimme a moment
Looking up the rules
 
ok
 
meta.stackexchange.com/questions/271267/… I don't see anything specific there
 
I mean, I would appeal the suspension via email, but I'm still waiting for a reply from a month ago.
Well, is there anyone who I can ask to manually remove the suspension?
 
6:08 AM
BUT
147
Q: Are expletives (cursing, swear words or vulgar language) allowed on SE sites?

Jeff AtwoodCan I use salty, expletive-laden language on Stack Exchange sites, like Q*Bert? For more information, see "What kind of behavior is expected of users?" in the Help Center. Return to FAQ index

chat is an SE site...
@forest honestly? Why else do you think I keep politely reminding people not to swear?
Cause this... stuff... keeps happening
 
> If you continue to use expletives, you will be placed on timed suspension.
Hm, that doesn't jive.
 
Sometimes to people I actually sympathise with
 
Is it permissible to search for the f-word and auto-flag?
(Assuming of course it's not done on English.SE lol)
 
Occasionally weeks or months after the fact
.... That's... Kinda a bit of an act of potential petulance
It does no one any good
 
Well if it's disallowed, what's wrong with flagging it? Anyway how do you even flag from the chat search feature? It just shows an option for history or permalink.
Wow, even Shog9 is breaking the rules regularly. :o
 
6:11 AM
Donno. It's just a horrible thing to do
 
And here I thought mods were held to higher standards. :/
 
Hah
We try
Sometimes we even live up to those standards
 
Is it impossible to flag messages in history without clicking "load older messages" a thousand times? Or transcript messages or whatever they're called.
 
Lol. Idk. So imagine the people who do that, or farm comment flags like that...
 
Well if it's the proper thing to do when upholding the rules.
I'd hate to be held to higher standards than other people.
hm
 
6:14 AM
Lol
 
Maybe send an email to report a code of conduct violation? But that seems excessive.
 
It takes actual work to be polite when you're mad at someone
 
You don't have to be polite if you don't want. Long as you don't ban me, I don't care.
 
Eh.
Said higher standards ;p
 
true
 
6:16 AM
And occasionally you can do a lot more damage and annoyance that way ;p
 
Since I'm 70% sure who flagged it, I wonder how many times they used that word. If it's more than just a few, I wonder how long they can get suspended if I flag a new one every 30 minutes. Doesn't it also increase suspension times if multiple messages are deleted for abusive chats in succession?
Or is that only for manual kicks from moderators?
 
Needs a 10ker to approve. Maybe more
I forget.
 
ah
Well since it gets shown to so many people, it seems to get always approved.
Are moderators capable of flagging as a regular user, or are all their actions mod actions?
 
Well that's one reason we have the Language! Rule on RA
 
In chat, that is.
 
6:19 AM
And mods help fix things
 
Well I didn't get suspended in RA. I'm well aware of that rule there. :P
 
Eh. It's more of a shared courtesy
And I got that a few times myself.
 
So SE must have removed the ability to flag old comments.
I wonder if they can still be flagged directly via a POST request.
@JourneymanGeek Can I undo an abusive/offensive flag in chat? E.g. can I flag your post to obtain the POST request and then undo the flag immediately after?
 
Say wot?
 
Like, if I submit a flag for offensive, can I undo the flag like I can for posts?
 
6:30 AM
Don't think so
 
Well I probably can't ask you to curse so I can flag it legitimately. :P
 
Won't work - I'm a mod ;p
 
Mods can't get flags acted on?
Or do you mean mods are incapable of cursing? :P
 
Also eh I'd not be inclined to help anyway. You do annoy me 😁
@forest yes
@forest eh. Usually in no less than 2 languages
 
@JourneymanGeek So if I flag a random comment of yours, nothing will happen?
I mean, I just want to test something out but don't want to get banned for false flagging. :P
 
6:44 AM
@forest probably not to me
 
Well this certainly isn't intuitive.
"chatusr: t=<whole bunch of base64>"
And here I was hoping it'd be something like a POST to "/flag" with parameters "id: 1234", "fkey: 5678".
@JourneymanGeek I got so good at trolling that now I can annoy someone without even trying! Wee!
 
7:06 AM
@forest oh you work at it
@forest rofl
 
@JourneymanGeek You'd know if I was trying! Biggest things I've done beyond causing week-long sh*tstorms on various forums was causing more than a dozen people in an IRC channel that I hated to quit due to, apparently, getting traumatized (nickspam with links can be vicious). But just having an aura of annoying? That's something that comes naturally. I've actually softened up significantly. :P
 
The chat API is one of SE's forgotten projects that I am sad about
That would make it easier. Most chatbots are horrible yet beautiful hacks
@forest not something to be proud of
 
Well that's why I prefer IRC. Chatbots are so much easier to set up.
 
IRC is a protocol. And a really stable one
 
@JourneymanGeek Hey if people can be proud of things they don't control like their race or the country they live in, I can be proud of being influential enough to impact massive communities!
 
7:09 AM
So easier
@forest depends on the impact
 
"stable" tell that to all the IRC services and IRCds that violate the RFC. :P
Well usually the impact is just a sh*tstorm which is fun to watch. Not harmful in the long run.
 
Well yeah but if you wanted to follow it you could
Compare it to matrix
 
Never used matrix.
I just see people on IRC with [m] in their name and I instantly hate them.
 
It's a work in progress but it kinda grows on you.
 
But... can you use Matrix with telnet and not have any issues? :P
 
7:12 AM
@forest eh. Why?
@forest well it uses https as a backend
 
Because they're, for lack of a better term, complete noobs who don't understand the culture of the channel they're in. The kind of people who think IRC is just your average chat site.
@JourneymanGeek Well then openssl s_client. It's like netcat, but for TLS.
 
Funny but that's true of a lot of IRC anyway
And matrix is niche
 
Is it? Maybe I just had a bad experience the first few times I saw Matrix users.
I mean, it just irks me to no end to see someone ask "how do I change my name?".
 
Well I only even know about it cause I needed a notification system
 
Although, in the case of hunter2, ignorance can be really, really funny.
Ah. I've used bouncers for notification.
 
7:17 AM
Well, the nice thing is you run the whole stack, there's a command line client (which I hook into stuff) and it kinda just works once you have it set up
the less nice thing is you're abusing a chat client ;p
 
Using a command line client is abusing it? huh?
 
naw, rather that its chat
so you're literally opening a DM session with a bot to send notifications
its... inelegant
 
ew
 
for 'local' notifications I was using GFW (on the windows side) and gntp send to send messages
but that's ugly in its own way
What's the phrase
it works, but its kinda held together by duct tape and prayer?
 
Haphazard?
Though in computer lingo, that's called a hack.
 
7:21 AM
yup
Yes it is
And there's many almost ok options.
 
Almost everything I develop ends up being really hacky. lol
Even had a phase where I'd write spambots in obscure languages just because.
See how ugly I could make it while still being functional. Wrote a few IRC bots like that too.
 
gotify looks ok but I can't find mentions of desktop clients - I'd want windows and linux support...
I mean if it was 'easy' I'd ask for haiku clients as well ;p
 
heh
 
(though, matrix, and I guess IRC would do that)
 
Shame there will never be a client for TempleOS.
 
7:25 AM
eh
did templeos even do networking?
 
Nope. God said it must never do networking.
That's why there'll never be a client for it, sadly.
 
ya... a chat client without networking would be tricky
 
Well that, and Terry Davis being dead and all.
(rip)
 
heh, It might almost run on my old project box but...
I'm not sure what god thinks of sata
 
Well SATA can downgrade to PIO mode which I'm sure it supports.
 
7:29 AM
eh, maybe
 
Might be limited to IDE though. Dunno.
 
and this is a pretty old box
kinda one of the first generation to be native sata
(thinkpad R60. Oddly enough, after about 12 years it still runs)
and If I had the forsight to keep the ram from the two newer laptopss I junked cause they died, I could have maxed this out at 2gb ;p
but both debian(this is the last gen that was 32 bit only) and haiku (well some software only runs 64 bit) run reasonably on this
oh
and 1024x768 4:3 sceen
and a proper proper thinkpad keyboard
 
It's weird to think that Terry Davis died almost exactly a year ago. :(
I even talked with him on IRC. He was a very odd person.
 
that seems unsurprising
 
He would literally spend hours talking to a markov bot.
And replying as if he understood it. I think he went like 16 hours straight.
 
7:35 AM
Honestly - any sort of mental illness is... difficult
Even the ones that kinda take place, well, in this reality
and the support structure in many cultures is terrible, even if you manage to get over it
 
The stigma doesn't help either.
 
8:04 AM
@forest IKR :/ People call everyone with a mental health condition here "crazy".
Even people who should know better. Like nurses and doctors
 
 
2 hours later…
10:07 AM
@SonictheAnonymousWizHog gone
 
 
1 hour later…
11:21 AM
 
 
2 hours later…
404
1:24 PM
@Feeds Ugh. An ad added as a Sunday update was fine, but replacing a regularly scheduled Friday comic with an ad... :-/
I demand my money back.
Also, a new Area 51 proposal:
2
Ocean Nomads

Proposed Q&A site for captains of ocean capable privately owned vessels

Currently in definition.

Needs more programming questions.
 
@404 so a cheque for 0.00?
 
 
7 hours later…
8:00 PM
Happy?
 
happy
 
Nah. Just content. But that's good too ;)
 
As long as the content is worth an upvote I'm happy
 
I'd upvote myself right now :)
 
You can have my vote as well. Let's do a happy voting ring
 
8:12 PM
Hmmm. If anything, this is a good time for vote fraud. I just marked myself absent from mod duties anyways today ;)
 
On all sites?
(Side note: I missed that "content" pun for a second)
 
@SonictheAnonymousWizHog No, just this one. I'm going to camp on IPS this vacation.
 
@SonictheAnonymousWizHog not for a third?
Man, I'm good at this ...
 
@Tinkeringbell Does the vacation system require you to put in a time?
@rene I plead the fifth
 
lol
 
8:16 PM
@SonictheAnonymousWizHog Not that I know.
My sixth sense says these puns are going to get way worse...
 
In any case, I like that my contributions to the FAQs on locking have been indirectly acknowledged in the moderator newsletter.
 
Some links have to wait before I can read those ...
 
In the meantime I've become a victim of targeted advertising... Some Twitter account selling custom made stitch markers is liking my crochet tweets. To block or not block, that's the question...
 
flag
 
There's flags on Twitter? ;)
 
8:22 PM
Maybe advertize them back?
@Tinkeringbell yes, but no mods ...
 
@rene Hmmm. I find it a pretty desperate and annoying action. I know that everything I put on Twitter is very public... But I'd rather people admire the stuff I make, instead of seeing it as a business opportunity.
Not really deserving of more advertising
@rene I'm a mod and on Twitter ;)
 
close vote all tweets
4
@Tinkeringbell you're influencing ...
 
@rene I've become my own worst nightmare it seems. :P
@rene Not mine. Mine are on topic, not opinion based, broad or unclear. Just awesome XD
 
8:37 PM
I give you that ;)
 
Aww thanks! I really needed that :P
 
8:55 PM
> IE 10 is good and fast
2
that is unlikely ....
 
9:25 PM
Depends on what you're used to, I guess
 
9:35 PM
@rene Fun fact: SE held out and supported IE10 for a long time.
I guess the lack of bug reports about it were because there were very few users who actually used it.
 
404
10:06 PM
TL;DR: Install an adblocker. Take SE and all its sites off your whitelist. — Nic Hartley 6 hours ago
Reminded me of Why Stack Overflow Doesn’t Care About Ad Blockers and the comments under it.
Some folks bemoaned the loss of "trust" between the users and SE inc.
To me, it's regression to the normal, healthy level. Trust as far as you can throw a piano.
The very idea of trusting a company is harmful. The person who wrote that nice blog post... does not work here anymore. Another person took his place, without any users noticing. And the new person does not mind experimenting with the new exciting forms of advertisement.
 
10:42 PM
@404 SE still dosen't care about adblockers
 
But for the sites that do care about ad blockers, I do use Nano Defender to block the anti-adblock prompts
In Russia, answers downvote you. — bmargulies 32 secs ago
 
11:16 PM
And there's different parts of the company we have different expectations of and different levels of ability to communicate to if not influence.
I'm honestly more concerned with our ability to communicate and effect change as far as the Q&A engine and network goes (which has sometimes been lacking). We have never had much communication with careers and ads
So trust them? I hardly know them. And there's been times I have been pretty much ... Not a fan... Of them.
 

« first day (3299 days earlier)      last day (1715 days later) »