@Arulkumar Thanks for all the CV Reviews, there's a bunch left if someone can do them please. BTW: Not everyone is actually applicable to only one site so don't just agree with each one <cough> (or ping me about any disagreement) <@cough>.

@Rob some of those flags are very bogus

And looks like someone just blew all their flags on anything SO related

@JourneymanGeek, agreed, and I cautioned about roboreviewing. I didn't agree with all of them for the reasons stated above. People are free to go through them and disagree with the bogus ones. Good or bad they should be cleared out.

I just looked up why the limit is 20, it's for diversity.

Welllll

I have no limit

But I'm also feeling like it's a bit... Boring XD

I'm also inclined to leave 'MSO' questions of interest to the wider community be

Ok, done a run through the queues, It should be substantially managed

Thanks. That's the most pending I've seen there. It would be an idea if number of reviews allowed increased much as number of flags allowed increased, but that's already been asked: it reduces diversity, and only makes it harder for people whom have no review badges to get their first (thus skewing the value of the badge from a certain difficulty level to much harder to obtain). Now, if people whom first proposed the flag had their allocation reduced if subsequent reviewers all disagreed ...

@Rob honestly - I don't think its a critical thing to have to deal with

yes, we have a load of old MSO posts

they're harmless

Same here. No Image.

Damn, that's super meta

it is for me too

'kay, thanks!

This seems to be the cause of the problem:

@Rob That should give you bonus points ...

@rene Devo wrote a song - no bonus.

But it's gotta hurt.

@Marshmallow K

SDK

@MetaAndrewT. Hey, Mr. Android, you forgot a space.

@MetaAndroidT. Oops, you're right...

@JourneymanGeek no worries, I cover your back ...

@rene You're a big sort of flower then?

Yes, I'm huge

Hmm. That finally narrows down the Google options when trying to determine your species! It's pretty hard to reverse image search your blurry picture!

I'm pretty sure Rene is a cactus

@Tinkeringbell it had been discussed before: chat.meta.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/2456913#2456913

@rene Pfft. All that effort and it's already fixed!

I thank you for spending time on me. Appreciated ;)

That doesn't sound awkward at all ....

It sounds just silly enough to cheer my day up a little ;)

@Tinkeringbell if you need cheering up ... chat.meta.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/2456823#2456823

@rene Hahahaha I should've read more transcript ;)

@Tinkeringbell The relatives were much easier to track down, despite being clear.

@Rob I did see that one back then yeah. But I failed there too in finding the true picture ;)

Is this feature still enabled: meta.stackexchange.com/a/35141/158100 because based on meta.stackoverflow.com/q/387102/578411 you would conclude it isn't.

Or is the title filter run first (and that removes any repeated characters it finds at the end)

@SonictheAnonymousWizHog thanks for the edit on the HNQ timer reset thing. Reads smoother now :)

And people wonder why SO has a bad rap:

...wack. Reputation dropdown looks different.

@Mithrandir yeah: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/330775/…

Everything is bold now.

Earlier on the daily stand-up of the design team: Where are you working on? Bold things. Awesome!

yeah... pretty sure I've read those already...

fixed