« first day (1629 days earlier)      last day (3388 days later) » 
00:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

@hichris123 the wut?
 
@Braiam It's my version of Smokey, but it uses a regression model instead of regexes.
 
> So you want me to change the address that’s printed on your labels?
of course!
@hichris123 I was wutting at the title
 
ah lol
 
am watching now
 
4:10 PM
flags bjb for spam vid
 
@bjb568 very interesting
 
user259867
The back of my head is featured twice in the latest #stackexchange blog post, can you find waldo?
 
user259867
In the comments, everyone is discussing office plans. Nobody tried to identify the people shown. For example, many familiar faces here, but also a few I can't recognize.
 
@Fundamental /me looks for telltale pew pew gun
 
@Fundamental Some of those pictures are old. Also, some might have sales people.
 
user259867
4:24 PM
@hichris123 Right, but the one I linked looks like a Community Team meeting.
 
yeah, seems like it
 
user259867
Left to right: ?, ?, jaydles, Laura, Robert Cartaino (almost hidden behind her), Shog, Tim Post, Joel, Anna Lear (? not a CM anymore), Abby.
 
@Fundamental Could one of those be Aarthi?
 
:D one of those ... yeah, which one of the two on the left?
 
err... that's the joke right?
 
user259867
4:34 PM
Ah, of course it's an old picture, from back when the meetup was in NY. This explains Anna Lear's presence. And yes, I think it's Aarthi in red. Then who's on the left of her?
 
@Fundamental all correct (with Shog/Joel/Tim from front to back), left two are Sam and Aarthi
 
> Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live.
4
 
Okay, now on to addresses and social security numbers @Fundamental
 
In the board room at the back you can see Marc, Demis, Jason, David
(actually you see Jason twice, but one of them is a mirror image)
 
user259867
@balpha Thanks for confirming. He did look like Sam the Brand to me, but I was too intrigued by the possibility of seeing Grace Note for the first time ever...
 
user259867
4:47 PM
(Fat chance, I know)
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: MINECRAFT ERROR: EXCEPTION ACCESS VIOLATION : by MasterP on gaming.stackexchange.com
 
@Bart No. IIRC they should be rate-limited if they do, so...
 
user259867
@SmokeDetector fp
 
@Fundamental Registered question as false positive and added title to Bayesian doctype 'good'.
 
user259867
Smokey was triggered by question body (repeated characters in xxxxxxxxxx.xls, outside of code block), but tp still added title to "good". Not sure if worth fixing.
 
@Fundamental s/tp/fp/
 
user259867
5:26 PM
Right, a typo there (luckily not in my answer to SD)
 
@hichris123 sure, but that still says "go ahead and create a new account", right? If so, what's the point of a ban?
 
@Fundamental If you think the title isn't worth adding, use ignore.
 
@Bart Well, usually we're talking here about people who have no hope of recovering from their ban. They asked horrible questions which can't be salvaged. Then they can delete their account & create a new one, but that one is limited to 1 q/week. I'm fairly sure the rate limits loosen if you ask better questions, and tighten if you ask worse questions.
Also, the new system of rate-limits should be a ton better now (i.e. you ask a bad question, get rate limited for a day, ask another bad question, get rate limited for two days, so on and so forth)
 
@Braiam So like… as if you will maintain it yourself?
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive answer detected: What will our great-grandchildren play with? by user38730 on worldbuilding.stackexchange.com
 
0
A: Search for protected questions

MoosemanThis sounds like a good idea, but I doubt its usefulness. Think of it this way: If you search for "[php] [jquery]" you will get questions tagged php and jquery. But protected questions aren't really a group on their own. Unlike closing questions, protecting a question is subjective and can be don...

 
@SmokeDetector fp. Not offensive, just crap.
 
@JanDvorak Registered answer as false positive.
 
@JanDvorak Contains s***
 
6:04 PM
"In 50 years, children will be playing with rocks made out of plastic" -- In all due respect... WAT
2
@Mooseman still not offensive
 
user280395
Low Quality A (55.6%): I LIKE TOMAT0ES I LIKE TOMAT0ES, by hdhdhd, on bicycles.stackexchange.com.
 
Anyone use Gitlab on Ubuntu by a chance? I haz a question.
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive answer detected: difference in execution plans on UAT and PROD server by Pramod Kumar PC on dba.stackexchange.com
 
@SmokeDetector tp
:(
 
6:20 PM
!!/rev?
 
@Mooseman ^ Try now ;)
... but actually, tp doesn't do anything for answers.
tp's job is to register the title of the question as "bad" in the Bayesian DB, so when trying it for answers, it says it won't work there. tpu works though, but I don't know if we should blacklist this user.
 
gone
 
Why the "huh"?
 
Lots of editing.
 
myeah. Even by lord @ShadowWizard before. But that was rolled back
 
IDK what OP is trying to ask…
I don't think OP knows what OP is trying to ask…
 
I'm waiting for the OP to close it as "unclear what I'm asking".
2
 
done
 
user280395
Low Quality A (55.6%): A METAPHOR IS SOMTHING THAT IS NOT TRUE BUT SIMILER TO A SIMILE, by AANIS, on english.stackexchange.com.
 
7:05 PM
@ProgramFOX Thanks! :) Will try on next report!
 
7:16 PM
@Bart Please don't ...
 
7:42 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: BLAUPUNKT ENDEAVOUR-1000 HD by IvKaneva on android.stackexchange.com
 
@Bart yeah I gave up on that question
 
@SmokeDetector fp
 
@Mooseman Registered question as false positive and added title to Bayesian doctype 'good'.
 
:D
 
@Moosebot coffee
:-/
 
7:50 PM
The Moosebot is off in favor of Phamhilator
 
Where will I get my daily fox fix?
This doesn't feel on-topic. stackoverflow.com/q/28032470/656243
Thoughts?
 
meh. It is kinda programming-y.
 
8:03 PM
@LynnCrumbling agree
 
8:18 PM
Who thought it was a good idea to generate more audits if you hit skip often?
 
me
 
It doesn't seem obvious to me how the two are related.
 
2
A: Let's get critical: Oct 2014 Site Self-Evaluation

Ana HevesiI realize this self-eval happened a good while ago but I'm circling back after a request came in to the Community Team for feedback about how close G&L is graduating. In an effort to be helpful, I'll be blunt. This site is not showing the hockey stick growth we look for as a prerequisite to grad...

 
Just because you skip often doesn't mean roboreviewers don't.
 
8:19 PM
pass @rene @uni's address
 
Why do people with 0 helpful flags run for mod?
 
there's my response^^ finally
 
@Braiam Tnx, that will be useful
 
@bjb568 Because.
 
oh
 
8:24 PM
@Frank Eh, so a 'no', but not a scolding.. in fact, quite the opposite. "Doing great, keep a steady course."
 
@Frank congrats to all of you
 
To review the people, -1 if you have < 200 helpful flags or < 2k rep. -1 if uses No Action Needed or has skewed approve/reject edit ratio. 0 if after that comments look too nice or are crappy. +1 if is friendly, shows devotion to site, reviews not-crappily, and has produced quality answers.
Well, that's what I do mostly, if they have something exceptional, I could bend that criteria.
Code Maverick for example looks ok.
O_O (from AEJBUG)
 
@LynnCrumbling yup
 
Code Maverick, Evil Closet Monkey, and 3nafish look the best.
 
This is literally the best troll moderation post I have ever seen
 
8:31 PM
yeap
Do people judge candidates based on their blabberpost?
coz they shouldn't
 
@euphoriaoverlord Wasn't that the first nomination?
 
@hichris123 Yeah, he withdrew 11 minutes ago
 
user259867
totally off-topic in any case. But I'd call it VLQ rather than spam.
 
Sam
@HoboSapiens I'd say it is.
 
8:36 PM
@Fundamental eh
 
gone
 
Sam
in Low Quality Posts HQ, 26 secs ago, by Zephyr
Spam Flag Request for http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28033038/has-a-young-indian-i-phone-programme‌​r-solved-the-riemann-hypothesis by PeeHaa from PHP Reason: -pls
Seems we weren't the only ones.
 
Thanks, PHP gods.
I knew we could count on you.
Night!
 
user259867
8:53 PM
My stats for UX mod candidates... using same formula as I used for Math, which does not work well because UX is much smaller. Rep would be better capped at 10K than at 20K. And of course, these stats are blind to things like NAN reviewing, etc.
 
Will I ever stop wondering? : stackoverflow.com/q/28033056/3636680
 
Indication that I'm stressed: 5 windows open
 
@InfiniteRecursion ahwwww, pretty please?
 
me wants funz from barty ragequit! me wants funz from barty ragequit!
 
9:07 PM
Can we kickey borkey?
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: WHITE TEXT IN VISUAL EDITOR by Dmitrij Borowskij on stackoverflow.com
 
user259867
The links on meta.SO are now underlined... is this the time ever that an SE site underlines links?
 
do you count userscripts and non-CSS browsers?
 
user259867
9:22 PM
No... in this post, with a lot of links, the change is jarring but I think it's an improvement overall:
 
user259867
-1
Q: The Growing Problem with Close Votes

Alex KThis is not me asking for more than 40 close reviews per day. Nor am I asking to change the way close votes are handled. These issue have been touched on time and time again. I'm here to present a problem, not a solution. I've found myself moving more towards moderation in the last couple of mo...

 
9:36 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in answer: What are the pros and cons of a client state in Rome 2: Total War by vfsgbsdfrh on gaming.stackexchange.com
 
abuse
 
abusive and loud
 
user259867
@SmokeDetector ignore
 
@Fundamental Post ignored; alerts about it will not longer be posted.
 
user259867
@SmokeDetector ignore, a homework dump.
 
@Fundamental Post ignored; alerts about it will not longer be posted.
 
10:27 PM
-13
A: Make links in Stack Overflow answers more obvious?

Jeff AtwoodColor preference is a personal thing. The links are underlined here on meta because they're the same color as the text. Given the millions of users that have passed through SO, and the two (three?) times this has ever come up, 99.999% of users are not having trouble seeing the links.

 
10:46 PM
Oooh, UX election. Okay, time to downvote anyone with fewer helpful flags than me (if I can get 16 helpful flags without even trying, I'm hoping that a prospective mod can get at least more than I can by flagging blatant spam)
 
*fewer
 
What? I don't know what you're talking about
 
Facepalm moment here. "Why is my computer so slow?" -> Maximum processor state is 5%
 
[ SmokeDetector ] URL in title: Can the twit about stackexchange.com/performance please be removed or edited? by Shadow Wizard on meta.stackexchange.com
 
twit @ShadowWizard? lol
 
10:59 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] URL in title: Can the tweet about stackexchange.com/performance please be removed or edited? by Shadow Wizard on meta.stackexchange.com
 
@SmokeDetector ignore
 
@Doorknob Post ignored; alerts about it will not longer be posted.
 
That Shadow Wizard guy again...
2
 
"not" instead of "no" @hichris123
 
@Doorknob I don't know what you're talking about... that was obviously fixed! :P
Now I know why git was so slow yesterday.
 
11:14 PM
@hichris123 lol, never was big fan of twitter so never bothered looking into it :D
and it's just intuitive twitter --> twit... no?
 
no, you have it backwards. Twits produce Twitter
4
 
amazing they don't bother to buy tweeter.com
Hmm... guess I better delete this and post new feature request asking to add a tab then, since the page is completed after all. Objections?
 
user259867
Compared to...
 
user259867
@Nick_Craver @marcgravell So THATS what that was! The CPU was pegged enough for a measurable spike in power usage! http://t.co/LMVDObci3H
 
user259867
11:26 PM
 
@Fundamental This system should draw 300w max, so...
(PSU is 600w, but the GPU is super power efficient)
 
user259867
@hichris123 Smokey lied when he said the post will be ignored.
 
I thought we ignored that...
@Fundamental :(
 
11:42 PM
yesterday, by Shadow Wizard
@SmokeDetector we know it's a lie ;)
bug still not fixed ^^^
 
@ShadowWizard No, that part worked I think.
 
@hichris123 blacklisted users you mean?
 
yeah
eh, I dunno.
 
@ProgramFOX fixed that bug, he should know :)
 
Oh duh.
 
11:47 PM
 
@Unihedro ooooold :D
 
!!/rev
 
Fixed @ShadowWizard @Fundamental
> When ignoring a post, we fetch a tuple (post_id, site) via fetch_post_id_and_site_from_msg_content(). fetch_... was recently changed to return (post_id, site, type_of_post). Therefore, we were adding this to the ignorelist, and when checking the ignorelist, we compared it with (post_id, site). Of course, the comparison returned False.
 
@hichris123 cheers! +1
 
11:58 PM
@hichris123 so, basically you broke it yourself and didn't test what was going on behind scenes -_-
greps sources for all instances of fetch_post_id_and_site_from_msg_content()
 
user259867
^ criticism from the backseat
 
I'm bad at copying & pasting.
@Braiam Not me!
 
00:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

« first day (1629 days earlier)      last day (3388 days later) »